An in vitro study to compare the influence of newer luting cements on retention of cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis
Purpose: The study was conducted to evaluate the retentiveness of specifically formulated implant cements and compare its retentiveness with a commonly used noneugenol zinc oxide luting cement and also to assess the influence of abutment height on the retentiveness of these cements. Materials and Me...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.j-ips.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4052;year=2019;volume=19;issue=2;spage=166;epage=172;aulast= |
| _version_ | 1811254376770043904 |
|---|---|
| author | Hasan Sarfaraz Arifa Hassan K Kamalakanth Shenoy Mallika Shetty |
| author_facet | Hasan Sarfaraz Arifa Hassan K Kamalakanth Shenoy Mallika Shetty |
| author_sort | Hasan Sarfaraz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose: The study was conducted to evaluate the retentiveness of specifically formulated implant cements and compare its retentiveness with a commonly used noneugenol zinc oxide luting cement and also to assess the influence of abutment height on the retentiveness of these cements.
Materials and Methods: A master stainless steel mold was used to mount snappy abutment-implant analog complex in acrylic resin. A total of six snappy abutments (Nobel Biocare®) of 4 mm and 5.5 mm height with their analogs were used. A total of 66 ceramill® Sintron metal copings fabricated using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing system and divided into six groups (n = 11) according to the height (three 4 mm abutment and three 5.5 mm abutment). The cements that were compared were a Noneugenol zinc oxide provisional cement (Temp-BondTM NE), a Noneugenol temporary resin cement (Premier® Implant Cement) and a resin based acrylic urethane cement (Implalute® Implant Cement). After cementation samples were immersed in artificial saliva for 7 days and subjected to a pull-out test using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The load required to de-cement each coping was recorded and analyzed using one-way ANOVA, post hoc multiple comparison, and independent t-test.
Results: Noneugenol temporary resin cement had the highest tensile strength followed by noneugenol zinc oxide cement and the least retentive strength was observed in resin-based acrylic urethane cement.
Conclusion: The results suggest that noneugenol temporary resin cement may be considered as a better choice for cementation of implant prosthesis, as it has shown to have better mechanical properties. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T17:06:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9f803f49266b4d0e9103831035962ff6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0972-4052 1998-4057 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T17:06:19Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society |
| spelling | doaj.art-9f803f49266b4d0e9103831035962ff62022-12-22T03:23:56ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsThe Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society0972-40521998-40572019-01-0119216617210.4103/jips.jips_235_18An in vitro study to compare the influence of newer luting cements on retention of cement-retained implant-supported prosthesisHasan SarfarazArifa HassanK Kamalakanth ShenoyMallika ShettyPurpose: The study was conducted to evaluate the retentiveness of specifically formulated implant cements and compare its retentiveness with a commonly used noneugenol zinc oxide luting cement and also to assess the influence of abutment height on the retentiveness of these cements. Materials and Methods: A master stainless steel mold was used to mount snappy abutment-implant analog complex in acrylic resin. A total of six snappy abutments (Nobel Biocare®) of 4 mm and 5.5 mm height with their analogs were used. A total of 66 ceramill® Sintron metal copings fabricated using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing system and divided into six groups (n = 11) according to the height (three 4 mm abutment and three 5.5 mm abutment). The cements that were compared were a Noneugenol zinc oxide provisional cement (Temp-BondTM NE), a Noneugenol temporary resin cement (Premier® Implant Cement) and a resin based acrylic urethane cement (Implalute® Implant Cement). After cementation samples were immersed in artificial saliva for 7 days and subjected to a pull-out test using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The load required to de-cement each coping was recorded and analyzed using one-way ANOVA, post hoc multiple comparison, and independent t-test. Results: Noneugenol temporary resin cement had the highest tensile strength followed by noneugenol zinc oxide cement and the least retentive strength was observed in resin-based acrylic urethane cement. Conclusion: The results suggest that noneugenol temporary resin cement may be considered as a better choice for cementation of implant prosthesis, as it has shown to have better mechanical properties.http://www.j-ips.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4052;year=2019;volume=19;issue=2;spage=166;epage=172;aulast=Acrylic urethane cementimplant luting cementsresin-based temporary cementtensile strength |
| spellingShingle | Hasan Sarfaraz Arifa Hassan K Kamalakanth Shenoy Mallika Shetty An in vitro study to compare the influence of newer luting cements on retention of cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society Acrylic urethane cement implant luting cements resin-based temporary cement tensile strength |
| title | An in vitro study to compare the influence of newer luting cements on retention of cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis |
| title_full | An in vitro study to compare the influence of newer luting cements on retention of cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis |
| title_fullStr | An in vitro study to compare the influence of newer luting cements on retention of cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis |
| title_full_unstemmed | An in vitro study to compare the influence of newer luting cements on retention of cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis |
| title_short | An in vitro study to compare the influence of newer luting cements on retention of cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis |
| title_sort | in vitro study to compare the influence of newer luting cements on retention of cement retained implant supported prosthesis |
| topic | Acrylic urethane cement implant luting cements resin-based temporary cement tensile strength |
| url | http://www.j-ips.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4052;year=2019;volume=19;issue=2;spage=166;epage=172;aulast= |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hasansarfaraz aninvitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceofnewerlutingcementsonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT arifahassan aninvitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceofnewerlutingcementsonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT kkamalakanthshenoy aninvitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceofnewerlutingcementsonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT mallikashetty aninvitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceofnewerlutingcementsonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT hasansarfaraz invitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceofnewerlutingcementsonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT arifahassan invitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceofnewerlutingcementsonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT kkamalakanthshenoy invitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceofnewerlutingcementsonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedprosthesis AT mallikashetty invitrostudytocomparetheinfluenceofnewerlutingcementsonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedprosthesis |