Evaluation of carotid flow time to assess fluid responsiveness in the emergency department

Background: Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients is challenging. Objective, noninvasive tests that are easy to perform are needed. Doppler measurements of dynamic carotid artery parameters such as carotid blood flow (CBF) and carotid flow time (CFT) are being studied as the pote...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P Immanuel Judson, Kundavaram Paul Prabhakar Abhilash, Kishore Pichamuthu, Gina Maryann Chandy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Medical Ultrasound
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmuonline.org/article.asp?issn=0929-6441;year=2021;volume=29;issue=2;spage=99;epage=104;aulast=Judson
_version_ 1819129798178373632
author P Immanuel Judson
Kundavaram Paul Prabhakar Abhilash
Kishore Pichamuthu
Gina Maryann Chandy
author_facet P Immanuel Judson
Kundavaram Paul Prabhakar Abhilash
Kishore Pichamuthu
Gina Maryann Chandy
author_sort P Immanuel Judson
collection DOAJ
description Background: Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients is challenging. Objective, noninvasive tests that are easy to perform are needed. Doppler measurements of dynamic carotid artery parameters such as carotid blood flow (CBF) and carotid flow time (CFT) are being studied as the potential indicators of volume responsiveness, but the data supporting its use are sparse. Methods: This prospective, observational study was conducted in the adult emergency department from June to September 2018. Patients who were prescribed a bolus of 500 ml of crystalloid for any indication were enrolled. Carotid Doppler was performed before and after a fluid bolus to measure the change in CBF and CFT. The aim of our study was to determine if CFT can be used as a marker of fluid responsiveness. Results: During the 4-month study period, 209 patients were recruited through convenient sampling after obtaining informed written consent. 29.6% of patients presented with a mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65, among whom 58.1% had septic shock. The baseline CBF was 643.0 ± 212.7 ml/min, and it was 583.9 ± 207.1 ml/min and 668 ± 210.8 ml/min in hypotensive and normotensive patients, respectively. Considering a >10% increase in CBF as fluid response, there were 59% responders and 41% nonresponders. The MAP increased by 9.5% in the responders, while there was no significant change in CFT after the fluid bolus. There was no difference in CFT among the responders as compared to the nonresponders. There was no correlation between the change of CBF and CFT (r[207] = 0.013, P = 0.061) after the fluid bolus. Conclusion: Though easy to perform, CFT is probably not a good indicator of fluid responsiveness.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T08:49:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f83c8261d1d494f912b6e285c25bbf0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0929-6441
2212-1552
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T08:49:26Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Ultrasound
spelling doaj.art-9f83c8261d1d494f912b6e285c25bbf02022-12-21T18:32:01ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Ultrasound0929-64412212-15522021-01-012929910410.4103/JMU.JMU_77_20Evaluation of carotid flow time to assess fluid responsiveness in the emergency departmentP Immanuel JudsonKundavaram Paul Prabhakar AbhilashKishore PichamuthuGina Maryann ChandyBackground: Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients is challenging. Objective, noninvasive tests that are easy to perform are needed. Doppler measurements of dynamic carotid artery parameters such as carotid blood flow (CBF) and carotid flow time (CFT) are being studied as the potential indicators of volume responsiveness, but the data supporting its use are sparse. Methods: This prospective, observational study was conducted in the adult emergency department from June to September 2018. Patients who were prescribed a bolus of 500 ml of crystalloid for any indication were enrolled. Carotid Doppler was performed before and after a fluid bolus to measure the change in CBF and CFT. The aim of our study was to determine if CFT can be used as a marker of fluid responsiveness. Results: During the 4-month study period, 209 patients were recruited through convenient sampling after obtaining informed written consent. 29.6% of patients presented with a mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65, among whom 58.1% had septic shock. The baseline CBF was 643.0 ± 212.7 ml/min, and it was 583.9 ± 207.1 ml/min and 668 ± 210.8 ml/min in hypotensive and normotensive patients, respectively. Considering a >10% increase in CBF as fluid response, there were 59% responders and 41% nonresponders. The MAP increased by 9.5% in the responders, while there was no significant change in CFT after the fluid bolus. There was no difference in CFT among the responders as compared to the nonresponders. There was no correlation between the change of CBF and CFT (r[207] = 0.013, P = 0.061) after the fluid bolus. Conclusion: Though easy to perform, CFT is probably not a good indicator of fluid responsiveness.http://www.jmuonline.org/article.asp?issn=0929-6441;year=2021;volume=29;issue=2;spage=99;epage=104;aulast=Judsoncarotid blood flowcarotid flow timedoppleremergency departmentfluid responsiveness
spellingShingle P Immanuel Judson
Kundavaram Paul Prabhakar Abhilash
Kishore Pichamuthu
Gina Maryann Chandy
Evaluation of carotid flow time to assess fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
Journal of Medical Ultrasound
carotid blood flow
carotid flow time
doppler
emergency department
fluid responsiveness
title Evaluation of carotid flow time to assess fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
title_full Evaluation of carotid flow time to assess fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
title_fullStr Evaluation of carotid flow time to assess fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of carotid flow time to assess fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
title_short Evaluation of carotid flow time to assess fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
title_sort evaluation of carotid flow time to assess fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
topic carotid blood flow
carotid flow time
doppler
emergency department
fluid responsiveness
url http://www.jmuonline.org/article.asp?issn=0929-6441;year=2021;volume=29;issue=2;spage=99;epage=104;aulast=Judson
work_keys_str_mv AT pimmanueljudson evaluationofcarotidflowtimetoassessfluidresponsivenessintheemergencydepartment
AT kundavarampaulprabhakarabhilash evaluationofcarotidflowtimetoassessfluidresponsivenessintheemergencydepartment
AT kishorepichamuthu evaluationofcarotidflowtimetoassessfluidresponsivenessintheemergencydepartment
AT ginamaryannchandy evaluationofcarotidflowtimetoassessfluidresponsivenessintheemergencydepartment