Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures
Abstract Objective The present study aims to analyze the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classifications for ankle fractures, and the influence of evaluators training stage in these assessments. Methods...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000300372&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1797225762490679296 |
---|---|
author | Lucas Sacramento Ramos Henrique Mansur Gonçalves Anderson Freitas Marcio de Paiva Oliveira Diogo Marcelino Santos Lima Welvis Soares Carmargo |
author_facet | Lucas Sacramento Ramos Henrique Mansur Gonçalves Anderson Freitas Marcio de Paiva Oliveira Diogo Marcelino Santos Lima Welvis Soares Carmargo |
author_sort | Lucas Sacramento Ramos |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Objective The present study aims to analyze the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classifications for ankle fractures, and the influence of evaluators training stage in these assessments. Methods Anteroposterior (AP), lateral and true AP radiographs from 30 patients with ankle fractures were selected. All images were evaluated by 11 evaluators at different stages of professional training (5 residents and 6 orthopedic surgeons), at 2 different times. Intra- and interobserver agreement was analyzed using the weighted Kappa coefficient. Student t-tests for paired samples were applied to detect significant differences in the degree of interobserver agreement between instruments. Results Intraobserver analysis alone had a significant agreement in all classifications. Moderate to excellent interobserver agreement was highly significant (p ≤ 0.0001) for the Danis-Weber classification. The Danis-Weber classification showed, on average, a significantly higher degree of agreement than the remaining classification systems (p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion The Danis-Weber classification presented the highest reproducibility among instruments and the evaluator's little experience had no negative influence on the reproducibility of ankle fracture classifications. Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T08:06:45Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9f874334157540e5b56e5c86bd38cc20 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1982-4378 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T14:14:10Z |
publishDate | 2021-08-01 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia |
spelling | doaj.art-9f874334157540e5b56e5c86bd38cc202024-04-03T08:57:14ZengThieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia1982-43782021-08-0156337237810.1055/s-0040-1718508Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle FracturesLucas Sacramento Ramoshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-796XHenrique Mansur Gonçalveshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7527-969XAnderson Freitashttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6555-8193Marcio de Paiva Oliveirahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3147-5925Diogo Marcelino Santos Limahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1393-231XWelvis Soares Carmargohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-5859Abstract Objective The present study aims to analyze the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classifications for ankle fractures, and the influence of evaluators training stage in these assessments. Methods Anteroposterior (AP), lateral and true AP radiographs from 30 patients with ankle fractures were selected. All images were evaluated by 11 evaluators at different stages of professional training (5 residents and 6 orthopedic surgeons), at 2 different times. Intra- and interobserver agreement was analyzed using the weighted Kappa coefficient. Student t-tests for paired samples were applied to detect significant differences in the degree of interobserver agreement between instruments. Results Intraobserver analysis alone had a significant agreement in all classifications. Moderate to excellent interobserver agreement was highly significant (p ≤ 0.0001) for the Danis-Weber classification. The Danis-Weber classification showed, on average, a significantly higher degree of agreement than the remaining classification systems (p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion The Danis-Weber classification presented the highest reproducibility among instruments and the evaluator's little experience had no negative influence on the reproducibility of ankle fracture classifications. Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000300372&tlng=enankle fracturesclassificationreproducibility of results |
spellingShingle | Lucas Sacramento Ramos Henrique Mansur Gonçalves Anderson Freitas Marcio de Paiva Oliveira Diogo Marcelino Santos Lima Welvis Soares Carmargo Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia ankle fractures classification reproducibility of results |
title | Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures |
title_full | Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures |
title_short | Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures |
title_sort | evaluation of the reproducibility of lauge hansen danis weber and ao classifications for ankle fractures |
topic | ankle fractures classification reproducibility of results |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000300372&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucassacramentoramos evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures AT henriquemansurgoncalves evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures AT andersonfreitas evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures AT marciodepaivaoliveira evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures AT diogomarcelinosantoslima evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures AT welvissoarescarmargo evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures |