Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures

Abstract Objective The present study aims to analyze the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classifications for ankle fractures, and the influence of evaluators training stage in these assessments. Methods...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucas Sacramento Ramos, Henrique Mansur Gonçalves, Anderson Freitas, Marcio de Paiva Oliveira, Diogo Marcelino Santos Lima, Welvis Soares Carmargo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021-08-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000300372&tlng=en
_version_ 1797225762490679296
author Lucas Sacramento Ramos
Henrique Mansur Gonçalves
Anderson Freitas
Marcio de Paiva Oliveira
Diogo Marcelino Santos Lima
Welvis Soares Carmargo
author_facet Lucas Sacramento Ramos
Henrique Mansur Gonçalves
Anderson Freitas
Marcio de Paiva Oliveira
Diogo Marcelino Santos Lima
Welvis Soares Carmargo
author_sort Lucas Sacramento Ramos
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective The present study aims to analyze the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classifications for ankle fractures, and the influence of evaluators training stage in these assessments. Methods Anteroposterior (AP), lateral and true AP radiographs from 30 patients with ankle fractures were selected. All images were evaluated by 11 evaluators at different stages of professional training (5 residents and 6 orthopedic surgeons), at 2 different times. Intra- and interobserver agreement was analyzed using the weighted Kappa coefficient. Student t-tests for paired samples were applied to detect significant differences in the degree of interobserver agreement between instruments. Results Intraobserver analysis alone had a significant agreement in all classifications. Moderate to excellent interobserver agreement was highly significant (p ≤ 0.0001) for the Danis-Weber classification. The Danis-Weber classification showed, on average, a significantly higher degree of agreement than the remaining classification systems (p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion The Danis-Weber classification presented the highest reproducibility among instruments and the evaluator's little experience had no negative influence on the reproducibility of ankle fracture classifications. Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T08:06:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f874334157540e5b56e5c86bd38cc20
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1982-4378
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T14:14:10Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
spelling doaj.art-9f874334157540e5b56e5c86bd38cc202024-04-03T08:57:14ZengThieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia1982-43782021-08-0156337237810.1055/s-0040-1718508Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle FracturesLucas Sacramento Ramoshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-796XHenrique Mansur Gonçalveshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7527-969XAnderson Freitashttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6555-8193Marcio de Paiva Oliveirahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3147-5925Diogo Marcelino Santos Limahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1393-231XWelvis Soares Carmargohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-5859Abstract Objective The present study aims to analyze the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classifications for ankle fractures, and the influence of evaluators training stage in these assessments. Methods Anteroposterior (AP), lateral and true AP radiographs from 30 patients with ankle fractures were selected. All images were evaluated by 11 evaluators at different stages of professional training (5 residents and 6 orthopedic surgeons), at 2 different times. Intra- and interobserver agreement was analyzed using the weighted Kappa coefficient. Student t-tests for paired samples were applied to detect significant differences in the degree of interobserver agreement between instruments. Results Intraobserver analysis alone had a significant agreement in all classifications. Moderate to excellent interobserver agreement was highly significant (p ≤ 0.0001) for the Danis-Weber classification. The Danis-Weber classification showed, on average, a significantly higher degree of agreement than the remaining classification systems (p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion The Danis-Weber classification presented the highest reproducibility among instruments and the evaluator's little experience had no negative influence on the reproducibility of ankle fracture classifications. Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000300372&tlng=enankle fracturesclassificationreproducibility of results
spellingShingle Lucas Sacramento Ramos
Henrique Mansur Gonçalves
Anderson Freitas
Marcio de Paiva Oliveira
Diogo Marcelino Santos Lima
Welvis Soares Carmargo
Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
ankle fractures
classification
reproducibility of results
title Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures
title_full Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures
title_short Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures
title_sort evaluation of the reproducibility of lauge hansen danis weber and ao classifications for ankle fractures
topic ankle fractures
classification
reproducibility of results
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000300372&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT lucassacramentoramos evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures
AT henriquemansurgoncalves evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures
AT andersonfreitas evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures
AT marciodepaivaoliveira evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures
AT diogomarcelinosantoslima evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures
AT welvissoarescarmargo evaluationofthereproducibilityoflaugehansendanisweberandaoclassificationsforanklefractures