Predictors and outcomes of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: new insights into its recurrence patterns

Abstract Background The clinical profiles of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLS) need to be explored. The recurrence patterns of RLS are controversial and ambiguous. Methods A total of 138 patients with recurrent RLS were finally recruited in the study. The analysis of overall survival (OS)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huan Deng, Jingwang Gao, Xingming Xu, Guibin Liu, Liqiang Song, Yisheng Pan, Bo Wei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-11-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11586-8
_version_ 1797630182125731840
author Huan Deng
Jingwang Gao
Xingming Xu
Guibin Liu
Liqiang Song
Yisheng Pan
Bo Wei
author_facet Huan Deng
Jingwang Gao
Xingming Xu
Guibin Liu
Liqiang Song
Yisheng Pan
Bo Wei
author_sort Huan Deng
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The clinical profiles of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLS) need to be explored. The recurrence patterns of RLS are controversial and ambiguous. Methods A total of 138 patients with recurrent RLS were finally recruited in the study. The analysis of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was performed by Kaplan‒Meier analysis. To identify independent prognostic factors, all significant variables on univariate Cox regression analysis (P ≤ 0.05) were subjected to multivariate Cox regression analysis. The corresponding nomogram model was further built to predict the survival status of patients. Results Among patients, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 70.7%, 35.9% and 30.9%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates of the 55 patients who underwent R0 resection were 76.1%, 50.8% and 34.4%, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that resection method, tumor size, status of pathological differentiation, pathological subtypes and recurrence pattern were independent risk factors for OS or RFS. Patients with distant recurrence (DR) pattern usually had multifocal tumors (90.5% vs. 74.7%, P < 0.05); they were prone to experience changes of pathological differentiation (69.9% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.05) and had a better prognosis than those with local recurrence (LR) pattern. R0 resection and combined organ resection favored the survival of patients with DR pattern in some cases. Conclusions Patients with DR pattern had better prognosis, and they may benefit more from aggressive combined resection than those with LR pattern. Classifying the recurrence patterns of RLS provides guidance for individualized clinical management of recurrent RLS.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:04:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f8da5affc9b4ed5a3540e140432ea8e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T11:04:33Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj.art-9f8da5affc9b4ed5a3540e140432ea8e2023-11-12T12:20:15ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072023-11-0123111510.1186/s12885-023-11586-8Predictors and outcomes of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: new insights into its recurrence patternsHuan Deng0Jingwang Gao1Xingming Xu2Guibin Liu3Liqiang Song4Yisheng Pan5Bo Wei6Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, the First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, the First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, the First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, the First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General HospitalDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, the First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General HospitalAbstract Background The clinical profiles of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLS) need to be explored. The recurrence patterns of RLS are controversial and ambiguous. Methods A total of 138 patients with recurrent RLS were finally recruited in the study. The analysis of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was performed by Kaplan‒Meier analysis. To identify independent prognostic factors, all significant variables on univariate Cox regression analysis (P ≤ 0.05) were subjected to multivariate Cox regression analysis. The corresponding nomogram model was further built to predict the survival status of patients. Results Among patients, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 70.7%, 35.9% and 30.9%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates of the 55 patients who underwent R0 resection were 76.1%, 50.8% and 34.4%, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that resection method, tumor size, status of pathological differentiation, pathological subtypes and recurrence pattern were independent risk factors for OS or RFS. Patients with distant recurrence (DR) pattern usually had multifocal tumors (90.5% vs. 74.7%, P < 0.05); they were prone to experience changes of pathological differentiation (69.9% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.05) and had a better prognosis than those with local recurrence (LR) pattern. R0 resection and combined organ resection favored the survival of patients with DR pattern in some cases. Conclusions Patients with DR pattern had better prognosis, and they may benefit more from aggressive combined resection than those with LR pattern. Classifying the recurrence patterns of RLS provides guidance for individualized clinical management of recurrent RLS.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11586-8Retroperitoneal liposarcomaRecurrence patternPrognosisDistant recurrenceLocal recurrence
spellingShingle Huan Deng
Jingwang Gao
Xingming Xu
Guibin Liu
Liqiang Song
Yisheng Pan
Bo Wei
Predictors and outcomes of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: new insights into its recurrence patterns
BMC Cancer
Retroperitoneal liposarcoma
Recurrence pattern
Prognosis
Distant recurrence
Local recurrence
title Predictors and outcomes of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: new insights into its recurrence patterns
title_full Predictors and outcomes of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: new insights into its recurrence patterns
title_fullStr Predictors and outcomes of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: new insights into its recurrence patterns
title_full_unstemmed Predictors and outcomes of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: new insights into its recurrence patterns
title_short Predictors and outcomes of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: new insights into its recurrence patterns
title_sort predictors and outcomes of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma new insights into its recurrence patterns
topic Retroperitoneal liposarcoma
Recurrence pattern
Prognosis
Distant recurrence
Local recurrence
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11586-8
work_keys_str_mv AT huandeng predictorsandoutcomesofrecurrentretroperitonealliposarcomanewinsightsintoitsrecurrencepatterns
AT jingwanggao predictorsandoutcomesofrecurrentretroperitonealliposarcomanewinsightsintoitsrecurrencepatterns
AT xingmingxu predictorsandoutcomesofrecurrentretroperitonealliposarcomanewinsightsintoitsrecurrencepatterns
AT guibinliu predictorsandoutcomesofrecurrentretroperitonealliposarcomanewinsightsintoitsrecurrencepatterns
AT liqiangsong predictorsandoutcomesofrecurrentretroperitonealliposarcomanewinsightsintoitsrecurrencepatterns
AT yishengpan predictorsandoutcomesofrecurrentretroperitonealliposarcomanewinsightsintoitsrecurrencepatterns
AT bowei predictorsandoutcomesofrecurrentretroperitonealliposarcomanewinsightsintoitsrecurrencepatterns