Performance Evaluation of a New Coulometric Endpoint Method in Sweat Testing and Its Comparison With Classic Gibson&Cooke and Chloridometer Methods in Cystic Fibrosis

Background: The objective of the study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the coulometric endpoint method and compare it with classic Gibson&Cooke and chloridometer methods.Methods: This study is a prospective clinical study comparing two conventional sweat testing methods with the cou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yasemin Gokdemir, Pinar Vatansever, Bulent Karadag, Tuncay Seyrekel, Ozgur Baykan, Nilay Bas Ikızoglu, Refika Ersu, Fazilet Karakoc, Goncagul Haklar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fped.2018.00133/full
_version_ 1828752183791714304
author Yasemin Gokdemir
Pinar Vatansever
Bulent Karadag
Tuncay Seyrekel
Ozgur Baykan
Nilay Bas Ikızoglu
Refika Ersu
Fazilet Karakoc
Goncagul Haklar
author_facet Yasemin Gokdemir
Pinar Vatansever
Bulent Karadag
Tuncay Seyrekel
Ozgur Baykan
Nilay Bas Ikızoglu
Refika Ersu
Fazilet Karakoc
Goncagul Haklar
author_sort Yasemin Gokdemir
collection DOAJ
description Background: The objective of the study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the coulometric endpoint method and compare it with classic Gibson&Cooke and chloridometer methods.Methods: This study is a prospective clinical study comparing two conventional sweat testing methods with the coulometric endpoint method in previously diagnosed cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and a non-CF control group. All individuals underwent two simultaneous sweat collections. One sample of sweat, collected by the CFΔ collector coil system, was analyzed by two methods: the titrimetric Cl− measurement (Sherwood® Chloridometer 926S, Sherwood Scientific Ltd., Cambridge, UK) and the coulometric endpoint method (CF Δ Collection System®, UTSAT/Turkey); the second sample was collected from the other forearm by the Gibson&Cooke method and the collected sweat was analyzed by manual titration in accordance with the Schales&Schales method. Within-run and between-run imprecisions were evaluated via Cl− concentrations of 40, 70, and 130 mmol/L samples.Results: One hundred and seventy (60 CF and 110 controls) subjects were included in the study.All three sweat test methods discriminated CF subjects from the healthy individuals. The mean difference between the coulometric endpoint and titrimetric Cl− measurement methods was −1.5 mmol/L, (95% confidence limits of agreement, ranging from −8.9 to 15.9 mmol/L); the mean difference between manual titration vs. coulometric endpoint methods was 12.8 mmol/L, (95% confidence limits of agreement ranging from −9.7 to 45.3 mmol/L) and the mean difference between the manual titration and titrimetric Cl− measurement methods was 11.3 mmol/L, (95% confidence limits of agreement ranging from −7.8 to 40.5 mmol/L) based on a Bland-Altman analysis. In the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, made on the basis that Cl− concentration values < 40 mmol/L exclude the CF diagnosis, the coulometric endpoint method resulted in 96.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity for a cut-off value of 58.5 mmol/L (AUC: 0.994; 95% CI = 0.986–1.000; p < 0.001).Conclusions: The coulometric endpoint method can be as reliable as quantitative sweat Cl− analysis and may be considered as a definitive diagnostic tool for CF.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T21:05:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f9d1e2b2c9942d6bb5210cdba7f56bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T21:05:31Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-9f9d1e2b2c9942d6bb5210cdba7f56bc2022-12-22T01:33:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602018-05-01610.3389/fped.2018.00133331163Performance Evaluation of a New Coulometric Endpoint Method in Sweat Testing and Its Comparison With Classic Gibson&Cooke and Chloridometer Methods in Cystic FibrosisYasemin Gokdemir0Pinar Vatansever1Bulent Karadag2Tuncay Seyrekel3Ozgur Baykan4Nilay Bas Ikızoglu5Refika Ersu6Fazilet Karakoc7Goncagul Haklar8Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, TurkeyBiochemistry Laboratory, Yozgat City Hospital, Yozgat, TurkeyBiochemistry Laboratory, Ataturk State Hospital, Balikesir, TurkeyDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, TurkeyBackground: The objective of the study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the coulometric endpoint method and compare it with classic Gibson&Cooke and chloridometer methods.Methods: This study is a prospective clinical study comparing two conventional sweat testing methods with the coulometric endpoint method in previously diagnosed cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and a non-CF control group. All individuals underwent two simultaneous sweat collections. One sample of sweat, collected by the CFΔ collector coil system, was analyzed by two methods: the titrimetric Cl− measurement (Sherwood® Chloridometer 926S, Sherwood Scientific Ltd., Cambridge, UK) and the coulometric endpoint method (CF Δ Collection System®, UTSAT/Turkey); the second sample was collected from the other forearm by the Gibson&Cooke method and the collected sweat was analyzed by manual titration in accordance with the Schales&Schales method. Within-run and between-run imprecisions were evaluated via Cl− concentrations of 40, 70, and 130 mmol/L samples.Results: One hundred and seventy (60 CF and 110 controls) subjects were included in the study.All three sweat test methods discriminated CF subjects from the healthy individuals. The mean difference between the coulometric endpoint and titrimetric Cl− measurement methods was −1.5 mmol/L, (95% confidence limits of agreement, ranging from −8.9 to 15.9 mmol/L); the mean difference between manual titration vs. coulometric endpoint methods was 12.8 mmol/L, (95% confidence limits of agreement ranging from −9.7 to 45.3 mmol/L) and the mean difference between the manual titration and titrimetric Cl− measurement methods was 11.3 mmol/L, (95% confidence limits of agreement ranging from −7.8 to 40.5 mmol/L) based on a Bland-Altman analysis. In the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, made on the basis that Cl− concentration values < 40 mmol/L exclude the CF diagnosis, the coulometric endpoint method resulted in 96.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity for a cut-off value of 58.5 mmol/L (AUC: 0.994; 95% CI = 0.986–1.000; p < 0.001).Conclusions: The coulometric endpoint method can be as reliable as quantitative sweat Cl− analysis and may be considered as a definitive diagnostic tool for CF.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fped.2018.00133/fullsweat testcystic fibrosiscoulometric endpoint systemdiagnosischloride
spellingShingle Yasemin Gokdemir
Pinar Vatansever
Bulent Karadag
Tuncay Seyrekel
Ozgur Baykan
Nilay Bas Ikızoglu
Refika Ersu
Fazilet Karakoc
Goncagul Haklar
Performance Evaluation of a New Coulometric Endpoint Method in Sweat Testing and Its Comparison With Classic Gibson&Cooke and Chloridometer Methods in Cystic Fibrosis
Frontiers in Pediatrics
sweat test
cystic fibrosis
coulometric endpoint system
diagnosis
chloride
title Performance Evaluation of a New Coulometric Endpoint Method in Sweat Testing and Its Comparison With Classic Gibson&Cooke and Chloridometer Methods in Cystic Fibrosis
title_full Performance Evaluation of a New Coulometric Endpoint Method in Sweat Testing and Its Comparison With Classic Gibson&Cooke and Chloridometer Methods in Cystic Fibrosis
title_fullStr Performance Evaluation of a New Coulometric Endpoint Method in Sweat Testing and Its Comparison With Classic Gibson&Cooke and Chloridometer Methods in Cystic Fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Performance Evaluation of a New Coulometric Endpoint Method in Sweat Testing and Its Comparison With Classic Gibson&Cooke and Chloridometer Methods in Cystic Fibrosis
title_short Performance Evaluation of a New Coulometric Endpoint Method in Sweat Testing and Its Comparison With Classic Gibson&Cooke and Chloridometer Methods in Cystic Fibrosis
title_sort performance evaluation of a new coulometric endpoint method in sweat testing and its comparison with classic gibson cooke and chloridometer methods in cystic fibrosis
topic sweat test
cystic fibrosis
coulometric endpoint system
diagnosis
chloride
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fped.2018.00133/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yasemingokdemir performanceevaluationofanewcoulometricendpointmethodinsweattestinganditscomparisonwithclassicgibsoncookeandchloridometermethodsincysticfibrosis
AT pinarvatansever performanceevaluationofanewcoulometricendpointmethodinsweattestinganditscomparisonwithclassicgibsoncookeandchloridometermethodsincysticfibrosis
AT bulentkaradag performanceevaluationofanewcoulometricendpointmethodinsweattestinganditscomparisonwithclassicgibsoncookeandchloridometermethodsincysticfibrosis
AT tuncayseyrekel performanceevaluationofanewcoulometricendpointmethodinsweattestinganditscomparisonwithclassicgibsoncookeandchloridometermethodsincysticfibrosis
AT ozgurbaykan performanceevaluationofanewcoulometricendpointmethodinsweattestinganditscomparisonwithclassicgibsoncookeandchloridometermethodsincysticfibrosis
AT nilaybasikızoglu performanceevaluationofanewcoulometricendpointmethodinsweattestinganditscomparisonwithclassicgibsoncookeandchloridometermethodsincysticfibrosis
AT refikaersu performanceevaluationofanewcoulometricendpointmethodinsweattestinganditscomparisonwithclassicgibsoncookeandchloridometermethodsincysticfibrosis
AT faziletkarakoc performanceevaluationofanewcoulometricendpointmethodinsweattestinganditscomparisonwithclassicgibsoncookeandchloridometermethodsincysticfibrosis
AT goncagulhaklar performanceevaluationofanewcoulometricendpointmethodinsweattestinganditscomparisonwithclassicgibsoncookeandchloridometermethodsincysticfibrosis