Role of MR urethrography in assessment of urethral lesions

Aim of the work: To evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) urethrogram in the diagnosis and characterization of different urethral lesions in comparison with conventional urethrography. Material and methods: This prospective study included 18 male patients diagnosed to have urethral lesions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sameh A.Z. Hanna, Sherif F. Abdel Rahman, Bashar A. Altamimi, Ahmed M. Shoman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2015-06-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X15000431
_version_ 1818308891137540096
author Sameh A.Z. Hanna
Sherif F. Abdel Rahman
Bashar A. Altamimi
Ahmed M. Shoman
author_facet Sameh A.Z. Hanna
Sherif F. Abdel Rahman
Bashar A. Altamimi
Ahmed M. Shoman
author_sort Sameh A.Z. Hanna
collection DOAJ
description Aim of the work: To evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) urethrogram in the diagnosis and characterization of different urethral lesions in comparison with conventional urethrography. Material and methods: This prospective study included 18 male patients diagnosed to have urethral lesions. All of these patients were evaluated by using conventional urethrography prior to MR imaging. MR urethrography technique included: thick slab fast spin echo T2 (TSFSE) and fast recovery fast spin echo (FRFSE). Results: The causes of urethral lesions were: trauma in 13 patients (affecting the anterior urethra in 5 patients, the posterior urethra in 7 patients, the anterior and posterior urethra in one patient). Congenital abnormality in 3 patients at the anterior urethra and infection at the anterior urethra in 2 patients. Conventional urethrography and MRI diagnosed the presence of urethral pathology in all examined patients, However MR urethrography was superior in better delineation and characterization of the urethral pathology in four cases (22.2%) diagnosing prostatic displacement as well as periurethral fibrosis. Conventional urethrography was superior to MR urethrogram in diagnosing a case of diffuse pseudodiverticulosis. Conclusion: MR urethrography is a suitable technique for the evaluation of urethral and periurethral abnormalities.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T07:21:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9fd2d5589d7f4ad6b25ea012165f91ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0378-603X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T07:21:28Z
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
spelling doaj.art-9fd2d5589d7f4ad6b25ea012165f91ef2022-12-21T23:55:25ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine0378-603X2015-06-0146249950510.1016/j.ejrnm.2015.02.001Role of MR urethrography in assessment of urethral lesionsSameh A.Z. Hanna0Sherif F. Abdel Rahman1Bashar A. Altamimi2Ahmed M. Shoman3Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptRadiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptRadiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptUrology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptAim of the work: To evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) urethrogram in the diagnosis and characterization of different urethral lesions in comparison with conventional urethrography. Material and methods: This prospective study included 18 male patients diagnosed to have urethral lesions. All of these patients were evaluated by using conventional urethrography prior to MR imaging. MR urethrography technique included: thick slab fast spin echo T2 (TSFSE) and fast recovery fast spin echo (FRFSE). Results: The causes of urethral lesions were: trauma in 13 patients (affecting the anterior urethra in 5 patients, the posterior urethra in 7 patients, the anterior and posterior urethra in one patient). Congenital abnormality in 3 patients at the anterior urethra and infection at the anterior urethra in 2 patients. Conventional urethrography and MRI diagnosed the presence of urethral pathology in all examined patients, However MR urethrography was superior in better delineation and characterization of the urethral pathology in four cases (22.2%) diagnosing prostatic displacement as well as periurethral fibrosis. Conventional urethrography was superior to MR urethrogram in diagnosing a case of diffuse pseudodiverticulosis. Conclusion: MR urethrography is a suitable technique for the evaluation of urethral and periurethral abnormalities.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X15000431MR urethrographyConventional urethrographyUrethral lesions
spellingShingle Sameh A.Z. Hanna
Sherif F. Abdel Rahman
Bashar A. Altamimi
Ahmed M. Shoman
Role of MR urethrography in assessment of urethral lesions
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
MR urethrography
Conventional urethrography
Urethral lesions
title Role of MR urethrography in assessment of urethral lesions
title_full Role of MR urethrography in assessment of urethral lesions
title_fullStr Role of MR urethrography in assessment of urethral lesions
title_full_unstemmed Role of MR urethrography in assessment of urethral lesions
title_short Role of MR urethrography in assessment of urethral lesions
title_sort role of mr urethrography in assessment of urethral lesions
topic MR urethrography
Conventional urethrography
Urethral lesions
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X15000431
work_keys_str_mv AT samehazhanna roleofmrurethrographyinassessmentofurethrallesions
AT sheriffabdelrahman roleofmrurethrographyinassessmentofurethrallesions
AT basharaaltamimi roleofmrurethrographyinassessmentofurethrallesions
AT ahmedmshoman roleofmrurethrographyinassessmentofurethrallesions