Positive and Negative Relationship Evaluation Processes as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction

Relationship evaluation processes (REPs) are the thought processes people use to evaluate the quality of their romantic relationships (Buckingham et al., 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519833798). The present study expanded on previous REP research by developing measures of positive REPs to pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justin T. Buckingham, Krystyna Griswold, Gabrielle Ryan, Nicole Libbey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology 2023-12-01
Series:Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.9499
_version_ 1797320571231404032
author Justin T. Buckingham
Krystyna Griswold
Gabrielle Ryan
Nicole Libbey
author_facet Justin T. Buckingham
Krystyna Griswold
Gabrielle Ryan
Nicole Libbey
author_sort Justin T. Buckingham
collection DOAJ
description Relationship evaluation processes (REPs) are the thought processes people use to evaluate the quality of their romantic relationships (Buckingham et al., 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519833798). The present study expanded on previous REP research by developing measures of positive REPs to parallel existing measures of negative REPs, which measure people’s tendency to focus on negative relationship behavior and fears about the future of the relationship. Data from a diverse sample of 170 US adults provided an initial confirmation of the validity of the positive REP subscales, which measure people’s tendency to focus on positive relationship behavior and hopeful thoughts about the future of the relationship. Multiple regression analysis showed that positive and negative REPs significantly predict relationship satisfaction. Whereas negative REPs were associated with less relationship satisfaction, positive REPs were associated with greater satisfaction. We also examined the roles of depression, neuroticism, and optimism in predicting REPs and satisfaction.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:44:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9fd552ab678b427c8e25dec72676c1ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1981-6472
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T04:44:58Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology
record_format Article
series Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships
spelling doaj.art-9fd552ab678b427c8e25dec72676c1ef2024-02-08T10:56:15ZengPsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for PsychologyInterpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships1981-64722023-12-0117216117910.5964/ijpr.9499ijpr.9499Positive and Negative Relationship Evaluation Processes as Predictors of Relationship SatisfactionJustin T. Buckingham0Krystyna Griswold1Gabrielle Ryan2Nicole Libbey3Department of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, MD, USADepartment of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, MD, USADepartment of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, MD, USADepartment of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, MD, USARelationship evaluation processes (REPs) are the thought processes people use to evaluate the quality of their romantic relationships (Buckingham et al., 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519833798). The present study expanded on previous REP research by developing measures of positive REPs to parallel existing measures of negative REPs, which measure people’s tendency to focus on negative relationship behavior and fears about the future of the relationship. Data from a diverse sample of 170 US adults provided an initial confirmation of the validity of the positive REP subscales, which measure people’s tendency to focus on positive relationship behavior and hopeful thoughts about the future of the relationship. Multiple regression analysis showed that positive and negative REPs significantly predict relationship satisfaction. Whereas negative REPs were associated with less relationship satisfaction, positive REPs were associated with greater satisfaction. We also examined the roles of depression, neuroticism, and optimism in predicting REPs and satisfaction.https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.9499relationship evaluationrelationship satisfactionpositive thinkingnegative thinkingrelationship quality
spellingShingle Justin T. Buckingham
Krystyna Griswold
Gabrielle Ryan
Nicole Libbey
Positive and Negative Relationship Evaluation Processes as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction
Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships
relationship evaluation
relationship satisfaction
positive thinking
negative thinking
relationship quality
title Positive and Negative Relationship Evaluation Processes as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction
title_full Positive and Negative Relationship Evaluation Processes as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction
title_fullStr Positive and Negative Relationship Evaluation Processes as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Positive and Negative Relationship Evaluation Processes as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction
title_short Positive and Negative Relationship Evaluation Processes as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction
title_sort positive and negative relationship evaluation processes as predictors of relationship satisfaction
topic relationship evaluation
relationship satisfaction
positive thinking
negative thinking
relationship quality
url https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.9499
work_keys_str_mv AT justintbuckingham positiveandnegativerelationshipevaluationprocessesaspredictorsofrelationshipsatisfaction
AT krystynagriswold positiveandnegativerelationshipevaluationprocessesaspredictorsofrelationshipsatisfaction
AT gabrielleryan positiveandnegativerelationshipevaluationprocessesaspredictorsofrelationshipsatisfaction
AT nicolelibbey positiveandnegativerelationshipevaluationprocessesaspredictorsofrelationshipsatisfaction