Effect of Pre-Milking Teat Foam Disinfection on the Prevention of New Mastitis Rates in Early Lactation

The objective of this study was to determine the benefit of pre-milking teat foam disinfection on the prevention of new infections by contagious and environmental bacteria in two spring calving herds managed outdoors (Herd 1 [H1]; 331 cows and Herd 2 [H2]; 142 cows). Four pre-milking teat preparatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Rose Fitzpatrick, Mary Garvey, Jim Flynn, Bernadette O’Brien, David Gleeson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/9/2582
_version_ 1797520542869225472
author Sarah Rose Fitzpatrick
Mary Garvey
Jim Flynn
Bernadette O’Brien
David Gleeson
author_facet Sarah Rose Fitzpatrick
Mary Garvey
Jim Flynn
Bernadette O’Brien
David Gleeson
author_sort Sarah Rose Fitzpatrick
collection DOAJ
description The objective of this study was to determine the benefit of pre-milking teat foam disinfection on the prevention of new infections by contagious and environmental bacteria in two spring calving herds managed outdoors (Herd 1 [H1]; 331 cows and Herd 2 [H2]; 142 cows). Four pre-milking teat preparation treatments were applied post calving; with each herd receiving two treatments; using a split udder design (for approx. 15 weeks). These treatments included; (1) ‘water wash, foam application and dry wipe (WFD) in H1′; (2) ‘water wash and dry wipe (WD)’ in H1; (3) ‘foam application and dry wipe (FD)’ in H2; (4) ‘no teat cleaning preparation (NP)’ in H2. Individual quarter foremilk samples were collected on four occasions and all clinical and sub-clinical cases were recorded. The mean SCC of quarter foremilk samples was 134 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/mL and 127 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/mL for WD and WFD, respectively, and 109 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/mL and 89 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/mL for NP and FD, respectively (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Lower bacterial counts were observed on teat skin that received a foaming treatment. Pre-milking teat disinfection using a foaming product may be of little benefit, in early lactation, for a pasture-based dairy herd.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T07:58:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9fe3c98355b1400cbbcbcaab834704ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T07:58:17Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-9fe3c98355b1400cbbcbcaab834704ef2023-11-22T11:42:21ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-09-01119258210.3390/ani11092582Effect of Pre-Milking Teat Foam Disinfection on the Prevention of New Mastitis Rates in Early LactationSarah Rose Fitzpatrick0Mary Garvey1Jim Flynn2Bernadette O’Brien3David Gleeson4Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, P61 P302 Cork, IrelandDepartment of Life Science, Institute of Technology Sligo, F91 YW50 Sligo, IrelandTeagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, P61 P302 Cork, IrelandTeagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, P61 P302 Cork, IrelandTeagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, P61 P302 Cork, IrelandThe objective of this study was to determine the benefit of pre-milking teat foam disinfection on the prevention of new infections by contagious and environmental bacteria in two spring calving herds managed outdoors (Herd 1 [H1]; 331 cows and Herd 2 [H2]; 142 cows). Four pre-milking teat preparation treatments were applied post calving; with each herd receiving two treatments; using a split udder design (for approx. 15 weeks). These treatments included; (1) ‘water wash, foam application and dry wipe (WFD) in H1′; (2) ‘water wash and dry wipe (WD)’ in H1; (3) ‘foam application and dry wipe (FD)’ in H2; (4) ‘no teat cleaning preparation (NP)’ in H2. Individual quarter foremilk samples were collected on four occasions and all clinical and sub-clinical cases were recorded. The mean SCC of quarter foremilk samples was 134 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/mL and 127 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/mL for WD and WFD, respectively, and 109 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/mL and 89 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/mL for NP and FD, respectively (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Lower bacterial counts were observed on teat skin that received a foaming treatment. Pre-milking teat disinfection using a foaming product may be of little benefit, in early lactation, for a pasture-based dairy herd.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/9/2582mastitispre-milking teat disinfectionsomatic cell countfoam teat disinfectantdairy cows
spellingShingle Sarah Rose Fitzpatrick
Mary Garvey
Jim Flynn
Bernadette O’Brien
David Gleeson
Effect of Pre-Milking Teat Foam Disinfection on the Prevention of New Mastitis Rates in Early Lactation
Animals
mastitis
pre-milking teat disinfection
somatic cell count
foam teat disinfectant
dairy cows
title Effect of Pre-Milking Teat Foam Disinfection on the Prevention of New Mastitis Rates in Early Lactation
title_full Effect of Pre-Milking Teat Foam Disinfection on the Prevention of New Mastitis Rates in Early Lactation
title_fullStr Effect of Pre-Milking Teat Foam Disinfection on the Prevention of New Mastitis Rates in Early Lactation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Pre-Milking Teat Foam Disinfection on the Prevention of New Mastitis Rates in Early Lactation
title_short Effect of Pre-Milking Teat Foam Disinfection on the Prevention of New Mastitis Rates in Early Lactation
title_sort effect of pre milking teat foam disinfection on the prevention of new mastitis rates in early lactation
topic mastitis
pre-milking teat disinfection
somatic cell count
foam teat disinfectant
dairy cows
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/9/2582
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahrosefitzpatrick effectofpremilkingteatfoamdisinfectiononthepreventionofnewmastitisratesinearlylactation
AT marygarvey effectofpremilkingteatfoamdisinfectiononthepreventionofnewmastitisratesinearlylactation
AT jimflynn effectofpremilkingteatfoamdisinfectiononthepreventionofnewmastitisratesinearlylactation
AT bernadetteobrien effectofpremilkingteatfoamdisinfectiononthepreventionofnewmastitisratesinearlylactation
AT davidgleeson effectofpremilkingteatfoamdisinfectiononthepreventionofnewmastitisratesinearlylactation