Physiological responses at short distances from a parametric speaker

<p>Abstract</p> <p>In recent years, parametric speakers have been used in various circumstances. In our previous studies, we verified that the physiological burden of the sound of parametric speaker set at 2.6 m from the subjects was lower than that of the general speaker. However,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee Soomin, Shimomura Yoshihiro, Katsura Tetsuo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-06-01
Series:Journal of Physiological Anthropology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jphysiolanthropol.com/content/31/1/16
_version_ 1818385754664992768
author Lee Soomin
Shimomura Yoshihiro
Katsura Tetsuo
author_facet Lee Soomin
Shimomura Yoshihiro
Katsura Tetsuo
author_sort Lee Soomin
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>In recent years, parametric speakers have been used in various circumstances. In our previous studies, we verified that the physiological burden of the sound of parametric speaker set at 2.6 m from the subjects was lower than that of the general speaker. However, nothing has yet been demonstrated about the effects of the sound of a parametric speaker at the shorter distance between parametric speakers the human body. Therefore, we studied this effect on physiological functions and task performance. Nine male subjects participated in this study. They completed three consecutive sessions: a 20-minute quiet period as a baseline, a 30-minute mental task period with general speakers or parametric speakers, and a 20-minute recovery period. We measured electrocardiogram (ECG) photoplethysmogram (PTG), electroencephalogram (EEG), systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Four experiments, one with a speaker condition (general speaker and parametric speaker), the other with a distance condition (0.3 m and 1.0 m), were conducted respectively at the same time of day on separate days. To examine the effects of the speaker and distance, three-way repeated measures ANOVA (speaker factor <it>x</it> distance factor <it>x</it> time factor) were conducted. In conclusion, we found that the physiological responses were not significantly different between the speaker condition and the distance condition. Meanwhile, it was shown that the physiological burdens increased with progress in time independently of speaker condition and distance condition. In summary, the effects of the parametric speaker at the 2.6 m distance were not obtained at the distance of 1 m or less.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-14T03:43:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9fe5988966044b43b414aace71f757e3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1880-6791
1880-6805
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T03:43:11Z
publishDate 2012-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Physiological Anthropology
spelling doaj.art-9fe5988966044b43b414aace71f757e32022-12-21T23:18:26ZengBMCJournal of Physiological Anthropology1880-67911880-68052012-06-013111610.1186/1880-6805-31-16Physiological responses at short distances from a parametric speakerLee SoominShimomura YoshihiroKatsura Tetsuo<p>Abstract</p> <p>In recent years, parametric speakers have been used in various circumstances. In our previous studies, we verified that the physiological burden of the sound of parametric speaker set at 2.6 m from the subjects was lower than that of the general speaker. However, nothing has yet been demonstrated about the effects of the sound of a parametric speaker at the shorter distance between parametric speakers the human body. Therefore, we studied this effect on physiological functions and task performance. Nine male subjects participated in this study. They completed three consecutive sessions: a 20-minute quiet period as a baseline, a 30-minute mental task period with general speakers or parametric speakers, and a 20-minute recovery period. We measured electrocardiogram (ECG) photoplethysmogram (PTG), electroencephalogram (EEG), systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Four experiments, one with a speaker condition (general speaker and parametric speaker), the other with a distance condition (0.3 m and 1.0 m), were conducted respectively at the same time of day on separate days. To examine the effects of the speaker and distance, three-way repeated measures ANOVA (speaker factor <it>x</it> distance factor <it>x</it> time factor) were conducted. In conclusion, we found that the physiological responses were not significantly different between the speaker condition and the distance condition. Meanwhile, it was shown that the physiological burdens increased with progress in time independently of speaker condition and distance condition. In summary, the effects of the parametric speaker at the 2.6 m distance were not obtained at the distance of 1 m or less.</p>http://www.jphysiolanthropol.com/content/31/1/16Parametric speakerDistanceMental taskPhysiological response
spellingShingle Lee Soomin
Shimomura Yoshihiro
Katsura Tetsuo
Physiological responses at short distances from a parametric speaker
Journal of Physiological Anthropology
Parametric speaker
Distance
Mental task
Physiological response
title Physiological responses at short distances from a parametric speaker
title_full Physiological responses at short distances from a parametric speaker
title_fullStr Physiological responses at short distances from a parametric speaker
title_full_unstemmed Physiological responses at short distances from a parametric speaker
title_short Physiological responses at short distances from a parametric speaker
title_sort physiological responses at short distances from a parametric speaker
topic Parametric speaker
Distance
Mental task
Physiological response
url http://www.jphysiolanthropol.com/content/31/1/16
work_keys_str_mv AT leesoomin physiologicalresponsesatshortdistancesfromaparametricspeaker
AT shimomurayoshihiro physiologicalresponsesatshortdistancesfromaparametricspeaker
AT katsuratetsuo physiologicalresponsesatshortdistancesfromaparametricspeaker