MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer Resonancia magnética y ecoendoscopia para el estadiaje del cáncer gástrico
Objective: to determine the diagnostic precision of endoscopic ultrasounds (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Methods: a prospective, blind study was carried out in 17 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer (GC) using endoscopic biopsy from Nove...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Aran Ediciones
2006-08-01
|
| Series: | Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082006000800003 |
| _version_ | 1811263577489670144 |
|---|---|
| author | M. G. Arocena A. Barturen L. Bujanda O. Casado M. M. Ramírez J. M. Oleagoitia M. Galdiz Iturri P. Múgica A. Cosme M. A. Gutiérrez-Stampa E. Zapata M. Echenique-Elizondo |
| author_facet | M. G. Arocena A. Barturen L. Bujanda O. Casado M. M. Ramírez J. M. Oleagoitia M. Galdiz Iturri P. Múgica A. Cosme M. A. Gutiérrez-Stampa E. Zapata M. Echenique-Elizondo |
| author_sort | M. G. Arocena |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: to determine the diagnostic precision of endoscopic ultrasounds (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Methods: a prospective, blind study was carried out in 17 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer (GC) using endoscopic biopsy from November 2002 to June 2003. Patients underwent preoperative MRI and EUS. The reference test used was pathology, and laparotomy for non-resectable cases. Results: MRI (53%) was better than EUS in the assessment of gastric wall infiltration (35%). MRI (50%) was also superior to EUS (42%) for N staging. After pooling stages T1-T2 and T3-T4 together, results improved for both MRI (67 and 87.5%, respectively) and EUS (67 and 62.5%, respectively) (p < 0.05). N staging -lymph node invasion- results were correct in 50% for MRI as compared to EUS (42%). In classifying positive and negative lymph nodes EUS was superior to MRI (73 versus 54%). Conclusions: MRI was the best method in the assessment of gastric wall infiltration. EUS was superior to MRI for T1 staging, and in the assessment of lymph node infiltration. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T19:47:45Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9fe6ae21f6c3458998cda38af805d3cc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1130-0108 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T19:47:45Z |
| publishDate | 2006-08-01 |
| publisher | Aran Ediciones |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas |
| spelling | doaj.art-9fe6ae21f6c3458998cda38af805d3cc2022-12-22T03:18:55ZengAran EdicionesRevista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas1130-01082006-08-01988582590MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer Resonancia magnética y ecoendoscopia para el estadiaje del cáncer gástricoM. G. ArocenaA. BarturenL. BujandaO. CasadoM. M. RamírezJ. M. OleagoitiaM. Galdiz IturriP. MúgicaA. CosmeM. A. Gutiérrez-StampaE. ZapataM. Echenique-ElizondoObjective: to determine the diagnostic precision of endoscopic ultrasounds (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Methods: a prospective, blind study was carried out in 17 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer (GC) using endoscopic biopsy from November 2002 to June 2003. Patients underwent preoperative MRI and EUS. The reference test used was pathology, and laparotomy for non-resectable cases. Results: MRI (53%) was better than EUS in the assessment of gastric wall infiltration (35%). MRI (50%) was also superior to EUS (42%) for N staging. After pooling stages T1-T2 and T3-T4 together, results improved for both MRI (67 and 87.5%, respectively) and EUS (67 and 62.5%, respectively) (p < 0.05). N staging -lymph node invasion- results were correct in 50% for MRI as compared to EUS (42%). In classifying positive and negative lymph nodes EUS was superior to MRI (73 versus 54%). Conclusions: MRI was the best method in the assessment of gastric wall infiltration. EUS was superior to MRI for T1 staging, and in the assessment of lymph node infiltration.http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082006000800003Magnetic resonance imagingEndoscopic ultrasoundGastric cancer |
| spellingShingle | M. G. Arocena A. Barturen L. Bujanda O. Casado M. M. Ramírez J. M. Oleagoitia M. Galdiz Iturri P. Múgica A. Cosme M. A. Gutiérrez-Stampa E. Zapata M. Echenique-Elizondo MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer Resonancia magnética y ecoendoscopia para el estadiaje del cáncer gástrico Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas Magnetic resonance imaging Endoscopic ultrasound Gastric cancer |
| title | MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer Resonancia magnética y ecoendoscopia para el estadiaje del cáncer gástrico |
| title_full | MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer Resonancia magnética y ecoendoscopia para el estadiaje del cáncer gástrico |
| title_fullStr | MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer Resonancia magnética y ecoendoscopia para el estadiaje del cáncer gástrico |
| title_full_unstemmed | MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer Resonancia magnética y ecoendoscopia para el estadiaje del cáncer gástrico |
| title_short | MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer Resonancia magnética y ecoendoscopia para el estadiaje del cáncer gástrico |
| title_sort | mri and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer resonancia magnetica y ecoendoscopia para el estadiaje del cancer gastrico |
| topic | Magnetic resonance imaging Endoscopic ultrasound Gastric cancer |
| url | http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082006000800003 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mgarocena mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico AT abarturen mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico AT lbujanda mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico AT ocasado mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico AT mmramirez mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico AT jmoleagoitia mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico AT mgaldiziturri mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico AT pmugica mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico AT acosme mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico AT magutierrezstampa mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico AT ezapata mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico AT mecheniqueelizondo mriandendoscopicultrasonographyinthestagingofgastriccancerresonanciamagneticayecoendoscopiaparaelestadiajedelcancergastrico |