Comparative Study between Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps and Local Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Reconstruction of Gluteal Pressure Ulcers

Background:. Gluteal pressure ulcers are a common problem, associated with great morbidity and cost, and their surgical treatment includes debridement with complete bursectomy, followed by soft tissue coverage. Gluteal artery perforator flaps and gluteal fasciocutaneous flaps are commonly preferred...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdel Nasser Mohamed El Naggar, MD, PhD, Mostafa Fathy Ibrahim, MD, PhD, Khaled Mohamed Abdel Azeem, MD, PhD, Ahmed Hamdy Mahmoud Ibrahim, MSC, MRCS, Emad Mohamed Hawas, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2024-03-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005671
_version_ 1827307999706742784
author Abdel Nasser Mohamed El Naggar, MD, PhD
Mostafa Fathy Ibrahim, MD, PhD
Khaled Mohamed Abdel Azeem, MD, PhD
Ahmed Hamdy Mahmoud Ibrahim, MSC, MRCS
Emad Mohamed Hawas, MD, PhD
author_facet Abdel Nasser Mohamed El Naggar, MD, PhD
Mostafa Fathy Ibrahim, MD, PhD
Khaled Mohamed Abdel Azeem, MD, PhD
Ahmed Hamdy Mahmoud Ibrahim, MSC, MRCS
Emad Mohamed Hawas, MD, PhD
author_sort Abdel Nasser Mohamed El Naggar, MD, PhD
collection DOAJ
description Background:. Gluteal pressure ulcers are a common problem, associated with great morbidity and cost, and their surgical treatment includes debridement with complete bursectomy, followed by soft tissue coverage. Gluteal artery perforator flaps and gluteal fasciocutaneous flaps are commonly preferred for reconstruction because they preserve the gluteal muscle, allowing for revision in recurrent cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences between these two flaps in the reconstruction of gluteal pressure ulcers regarding operative time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and recurrence. Methods:. This prospective comparative study was conducted on 30 patients who presented with stage IV gluteal pressure ulcers. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: each group consisted of 15 patients. Cases in group A were reconstructed using gluteal artery perforator flaps, and those in group B were reconstructed using local fasciocutaneous flaps. Results:. There was statistically significant long operative time and short postoperative hospital stay in gluteal artery perforator flaps when compared with local fasciocutaneous flaps. Also, the fasciocutaneous group reported a higher nonsignificant complication rate when compared with the gluteal perforator group. No recurrent cases were reported, and most patients had satisfactory outcomes in both groups. Conclusion:. Both techniques are safe, reliable, and effective and can be considered as a first-line option in the reconstruction of gluteal pressure ulcers.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:49:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a024332da3fa4036afbd10aa0561de28
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-7574
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:49:49Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
spelling doaj.art-a024332da3fa4036afbd10aa0561de282024-03-27T03:41:49ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742024-03-01123e567110.1097/GOX.0000000000005671202403000-00012Comparative Study between Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps and Local Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Reconstruction of Gluteal Pressure UlcersAbdel Nasser Mohamed El Naggar, MD, PhD0Mostafa Fathy Ibrahim, MD, PhD1Khaled Mohamed Abdel Azeem, MD, PhD2Ahmed Hamdy Mahmoud Ibrahim, MSC, MRCS3Emad Mohamed Hawas, MD, PhD4From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beni-suef University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beni-suef University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beni-suef University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beni-suef University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beni-suef University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.Background:. Gluteal pressure ulcers are a common problem, associated with great morbidity and cost, and their surgical treatment includes debridement with complete bursectomy, followed by soft tissue coverage. Gluteal artery perforator flaps and gluteal fasciocutaneous flaps are commonly preferred for reconstruction because they preserve the gluteal muscle, allowing for revision in recurrent cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences between these two flaps in the reconstruction of gluteal pressure ulcers regarding operative time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and recurrence. Methods:. This prospective comparative study was conducted on 30 patients who presented with stage IV gluteal pressure ulcers. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: each group consisted of 15 patients. Cases in group A were reconstructed using gluteal artery perforator flaps, and those in group B were reconstructed using local fasciocutaneous flaps. Results:. There was statistically significant long operative time and short postoperative hospital stay in gluteal artery perforator flaps when compared with local fasciocutaneous flaps. Also, the fasciocutaneous group reported a higher nonsignificant complication rate when compared with the gluteal perforator group. No recurrent cases were reported, and most patients had satisfactory outcomes in both groups. Conclusion:. Both techniques are safe, reliable, and effective and can be considered as a first-line option in the reconstruction of gluteal pressure ulcers.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005671
spellingShingle Abdel Nasser Mohamed El Naggar, MD, PhD
Mostafa Fathy Ibrahim, MD, PhD
Khaled Mohamed Abdel Azeem, MD, PhD
Ahmed Hamdy Mahmoud Ibrahim, MSC, MRCS
Emad Mohamed Hawas, MD, PhD
Comparative Study between Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps and Local Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Reconstruction of Gluteal Pressure Ulcers
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
title Comparative Study between Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps and Local Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Reconstruction of Gluteal Pressure Ulcers
title_full Comparative Study between Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps and Local Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Reconstruction of Gluteal Pressure Ulcers
title_fullStr Comparative Study between Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps and Local Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Reconstruction of Gluteal Pressure Ulcers
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study between Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps and Local Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Reconstruction of Gluteal Pressure Ulcers
title_short Comparative Study between Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps and Local Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Reconstruction of Gluteal Pressure Ulcers
title_sort comparative study between gluteal artery perforator flaps and local fasciocutaneous flaps in reconstruction of gluteal pressure ulcers
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005671
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelnassermohamedelnaggarmdphd comparativestudybetweenglutealarteryperforatorflapsandlocalfasciocutaneousflapsinreconstructionofglutealpressureulcers
AT mostafafathyibrahimmdphd comparativestudybetweenglutealarteryperforatorflapsandlocalfasciocutaneousflapsinreconstructionofglutealpressureulcers
AT khaledmohamedabdelazeemmdphd comparativestudybetweenglutealarteryperforatorflapsandlocalfasciocutaneousflapsinreconstructionofglutealpressureulcers
AT ahmedhamdymahmoudibrahimmscmrcs comparativestudybetweenglutealarteryperforatorflapsandlocalfasciocutaneousflapsinreconstructionofglutealpressureulcers
AT emadmohamedhawasmdphd comparativestudybetweenglutealarteryperforatorflapsandlocalfasciocutaneousflapsinreconstructionofglutealpressureulcers