Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine for third molar surgery
Background: This study aims to compare the anesthetic efficacy, postoperative pain, hemorrhage & dry sock incidence of articaine 4% versus lidocaine 2% in inferior alveolar nerve block during impacted lower third molar surgery. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted...
Main Authors: | Shirin Shahnaseri, Navid Mohammadi, Alireza Tamizifar, Seyed Amir Mousavi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcr.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jcr/article/view/286 |
Similar Items
-
A comparison between articaine mandibular infiltration and lidocaine mandibular block anesthesia in second primary molar: A randomized clinical trial
by: Elham Ghaffari, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and articaine used for buccal infiltration and supplemental palatinal infiltration anesthesia in maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized study
by: Duygu Kolay, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars
by: Seyedeh Hediyeh Daneshvar, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Comparison of the anaesthetic effects of 4% articaine hydrochloride and 2% lidocaine hydrochloride for maxillary molar extraction: A randomized double blind crossover study
by: Olufemi Adigun, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Buffered 4% Articaine Reduces Pain and Enhances Anesthesia in Maxillary Third Molar Extractions: A Randomized, Double-Blind Split-Mouth Study
by: Henning Staedt, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)