Effect of planting methods and cyanobacterial inoculants on yield, water productivity and economics of rice cultivation
The impact of two crop planting methods and of the application of cyanobacterial inoculants on plant growth, yield, water productivity and economics of rice cultivation was evaluated with the help of a split plot designed experiment during the rainy season of 2011 in New Delhi, India. Conventional t...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kassel University Press
2015-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jarts.info/index.php/jarts/article/view/2015061048464 |
_version_ | 1811304069121179648 |
---|---|
author | Amit A. Shahane Yudh Vir Singh Dinesh Kumar Radha Prasanna Debashish Chakraborty |
author_facet | Amit A. Shahane Yudh Vir Singh Dinesh Kumar Radha Prasanna Debashish Chakraborty |
author_sort | Amit A. Shahane |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The impact of two crop planting methods and of the application of cyanobacterial inoculants on plant growth, yield, water productivity and economics of rice cultivation was evaluated with the help of a split plot designed experiment during the rainy season of 2011 in New Delhi, India. Conventional transplanting and system of rice intensification (SRI) were tested as two different planting methods and seven treatments that considered cyanobacterial inoculants and compost were applied with three repetitions each. Results revealed no significant differences in plant performance and crop yield between both planting methods. However, the application of biofilm based BGA bio-fertiliser + 2/3 N had an overall positive impact on both, plant performance (plant height, number of tillers) and crop yield (number and weight of panicles) as well as on grain and straw yield. Higher net return and a higher benefit-cost ratio were observed in rice fields under SRI planting method, whereas the application of BGA + PGPR + 2/3 N resulted in highest values. Total water productivity and irrigation water productivity was significantly higher under SRI practices (5.95 and 3.67 kg ha^(-1) mm^(-1)) compared to practices of conventional transplanting (3.36 and 2.44), meaning that using SRI method, water saving of about 34 % could be achieved and significantly less water was required to produce one kg of rice. This study could show that a combination of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in conjunction with BGA and 2/3 dose of mineral N fertiliser can support crop growth performance, crop yields and reduces overall production cost, wherefore this practices should be used in the integrated nutrient management of rice fields in India. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:59:24Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a0498494dc174db988a1c7254a8d3b27 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1612-9830 2363-6033 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:59:24Z |
publishDate | 2015-09-01 |
publisher | Kassel University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics |
spelling | doaj.art-a0498494dc174db988a1c7254a8d3b272022-12-22T02:55:19ZengKassel University PressJournal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics1612-98302363-60332015-09-011162107121Effect of planting methods and cyanobacterial inoculants on yield, water productivity and economics of rice cultivationAmit A. Shahane0Yudh Vir Singh1Dinesh Kumar2Radha Prasanna3Debashish Chakraborty4Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, IndiaIndian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, IndiaIndian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, IndiaIndian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, IndiaIndian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, IndiaThe impact of two crop planting methods and of the application of cyanobacterial inoculants on plant growth, yield, water productivity and economics of rice cultivation was evaluated with the help of a split plot designed experiment during the rainy season of 2011 in New Delhi, India. Conventional transplanting and system of rice intensification (SRI) were tested as two different planting methods and seven treatments that considered cyanobacterial inoculants and compost were applied with three repetitions each. Results revealed no significant differences in plant performance and crop yield between both planting methods. However, the application of biofilm based BGA bio-fertiliser + 2/3 N had an overall positive impact on both, plant performance (plant height, number of tillers) and crop yield (number and weight of panicles) as well as on grain and straw yield. Higher net return and a higher benefit-cost ratio were observed in rice fields under SRI planting method, whereas the application of BGA + PGPR + 2/3 N resulted in highest values. Total water productivity and irrigation water productivity was significantly higher under SRI practices (5.95 and 3.67 kg ha^(-1) mm^(-1)) compared to practices of conventional transplanting (3.36 and 2.44), meaning that using SRI method, water saving of about 34 % could be achieved and significantly less water was required to produce one kg of rice. This study could show that a combination of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in conjunction with BGA and 2/3 dose of mineral N fertiliser can support crop growth performance, crop yields and reduces overall production cost, wherefore this practices should be used in the integrated nutrient management of rice fields in India.http://jarts.info/index.php/jarts/article/view/2015061048464conventional transplantingsystem of rice intensification (SRI)water productivityeconomics of ricebiofilm bio-fertiliserplant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) |
spellingShingle | Amit A. Shahane Yudh Vir Singh Dinesh Kumar Radha Prasanna Debashish Chakraborty Effect of planting methods and cyanobacterial inoculants on yield, water productivity and economics of rice cultivation Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics conventional transplanting system of rice intensification (SRI) water productivity economics of rice biofilm bio-fertiliser plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) |
title | Effect of planting methods and cyanobacterial inoculants on yield, water productivity and economics of rice cultivation |
title_full | Effect of planting methods and cyanobacterial inoculants on yield, water productivity and economics of rice cultivation |
title_fullStr | Effect of planting methods and cyanobacterial inoculants on yield, water productivity and economics of rice cultivation |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of planting methods and cyanobacterial inoculants on yield, water productivity and economics of rice cultivation |
title_short | Effect of planting methods and cyanobacterial inoculants on yield, water productivity and economics of rice cultivation |
title_sort | effect of planting methods and cyanobacterial inoculants on yield water productivity and economics of rice cultivation |
topic | conventional transplanting system of rice intensification (SRI) water productivity economics of rice biofilm bio-fertiliser plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) |
url | http://jarts.info/index.php/jarts/article/view/2015061048464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amitashahane effectofplantingmethodsandcyanobacterialinoculantsonyieldwaterproductivityandeconomicsofricecultivation AT yudhvirsingh effectofplantingmethodsandcyanobacterialinoculantsonyieldwaterproductivityandeconomicsofricecultivation AT dineshkumar effectofplantingmethodsandcyanobacterialinoculantsonyieldwaterproductivityandeconomicsofricecultivation AT radhaprasanna effectofplantingmethodsandcyanobacterialinoculantsonyieldwaterproductivityandeconomicsofricecultivation AT debashishchakraborty effectofplantingmethodsandcyanobacterialinoculantsonyieldwaterproductivityandeconomicsofricecultivation |