An experimental assessment of <it>in silico </it>haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To assess the utility of haplotype association mapping (HAM) as a quantitative trait locus (QTL) discovery tool, we conducted HAM analyses for red blood cell count (RBC) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) in mice. We then...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stylianou Ioannis M, Tsaih Shirng-Wern, Burgess-Herbert Sarah L, Walsh Kenneth, Cox Allison J, Paigen Beverly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-12-01
Series:BMC Genetics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/10/81
_version_ 1818229538451095552
author Stylianou Ioannis M
Tsaih Shirng-Wern
Burgess-Herbert Sarah L
Walsh Kenneth
Cox Allison J
Paigen Beverly
author_facet Stylianou Ioannis M
Tsaih Shirng-Wern
Burgess-Herbert Sarah L
Walsh Kenneth
Cox Allison J
Paigen Beverly
author_sort Stylianou Ioannis M
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To assess the utility of haplotype association mapping (HAM) as a quantitative trait locus (QTL) discovery tool, we conducted HAM analyses for red blood cell count (RBC) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) in mice. We then experimentally tested each HAM QTL using published crosses or new F2 intercrosses guided by the haplotype at the HAM peaks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The HAM for RBC, using 33 classic inbred lines, revealed 8 QTLs; 2 of these were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × CBA/J)F2 intercross we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 4 as false positives. The HAM for HDL, using 81 strains including recombinant inbred lines and chromosome substitution strains, detected 46 QTLs. Of these, 36 were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × A/J)F2 intercross that we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 8 as false positives. By testing each HAM QTL for RBC and HDL, we demonstrated that 78% of the 54 HAM peaks were true positives and 22% were false positives. Interestingly, all false positives were in significant allelic association with one or more real QTL.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Because type I errors (false positives) can be detected experimentally, we conclude that HAM is useful for QTL detection and narrowing. We advocate the powerful and economical combined approach demonstrated here: the use of HAM for QTL discovery, followed by mitigation of the false positive problem by testing the HAM-predicted QTLs with small HAM-guided experimental crosses.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-12T10:20:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a054938d85bf434e95d88c9be0ebc581
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2156
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T10:20:12Z
publishDate 2009-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Genetics
spelling doaj.art-a054938d85bf434e95d88c9be0ebc5812022-12-22T00:27:34ZengBMCBMC Genetics1471-21562009-12-011018110.1186/1471-2156-10-81An experimental assessment of <it>in silico </it>haplotype association mapping in laboratory miceStylianou Ioannis MTsaih Shirng-WernBurgess-Herbert Sarah LWalsh KennethCox Allison JPaigen Beverly<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To assess the utility of haplotype association mapping (HAM) as a quantitative trait locus (QTL) discovery tool, we conducted HAM analyses for red blood cell count (RBC) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) in mice. We then experimentally tested each HAM QTL using published crosses or new F2 intercrosses guided by the haplotype at the HAM peaks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The HAM for RBC, using 33 classic inbred lines, revealed 8 QTLs; 2 of these were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × CBA/J)F2 intercross we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 4 as false positives. The HAM for HDL, using 81 strains including recombinant inbred lines and chromosome substitution strains, detected 46 QTLs. Of these, 36 were true positives as shown by published crosses. A HAM-guided (C57BL/6J × A/J)F2 intercross that we carried out verified 2 more as true positives and 8 as false positives. By testing each HAM QTL for RBC and HDL, we demonstrated that 78% of the 54 HAM peaks were true positives and 22% were false positives. Interestingly, all false positives were in significant allelic association with one or more real QTL.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Because type I errors (false positives) can be detected experimentally, we conclude that HAM is useful for QTL detection and narrowing. We advocate the powerful and economical combined approach demonstrated here: the use of HAM for QTL discovery, followed by mitigation of the false positive problem by testing the HAM-predicted QTLs with small HAM-guided experimental crosses.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/10/81
spellingShingle Stylianou Ioannis M
Tsaih Shirng-Wern
Burgess-Herbert Sarah L
Walsh Kenneth
Cox Allison J
Paigen Beverly
An experimental assessment of <it>in silico </it>haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
BMC Genetics
title An experimental assessment of <it>in silico </it>haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
title_full An experimental assessment of <it>in silico </it>haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
title_fullStr An experimental assessment of <it>in silico </it>haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
title_full_unstemmed An experimental assessment of <it>in silico </it>haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
title_short An experimental assessment of <it>in silico </it>haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
title_sort experimental assessment of it in silico it haplotype association mapping in laboratory mice
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/10/81
work_keys_str_mv AT stylianouioannism anexperimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT tsaihshirngwern anexperimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT burgessherbertsarahl anexperimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT walshkenneth anexperimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT coxallisonj anexperimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT paigenbeverly anexperimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT stylianouioannism experimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT tsaihshirngwern experimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT burgessherbertsarahl experimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT walshkenneth experimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT coxallisonj experimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice
AT paigenbeverly experimentalassessmentofitinsilicoithaplotypeassociationmappinginlaboratorymice