An implantable loop recorder or smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram to detect arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart disease?

BackgroundThe European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) recommend screening in patients at risk for arrhythmic events. However, the optimal mode of detection is unknown.MethodsBaseline and follow-up data of symptomatic ACHD patients w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maarten A. Koole, Dirkjan Kauw, Kirsten M. Kooiman, Joris R. de Groot, Danielle Robbers-Visser, Igor I. Tulevski, Barbara J. Mulder, Berto J. Bouma, Mark J. Schuuring
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1099014/full
_version_ 1828070543367077888
author Maarten A. Koole
Maarten A. Koole
Maarten A. Koole
Dirkjan Kauw
Kirsten M. Kooiman
Joris R. de Groot
Danielle Robbers-Visser
Igor I. Tulevski
Barbara J. Mulder
Berto J. Bouma
Mark J. Schuuring
Mark J. Schuuring
Mark J. Schuuring
author_facet Maarten A. Koole
Maarten A. Koole
Maarten A. Koole
Dirkjan Kauw
Kirsten M. Kooiman
Joris R. de Groot
Danielle Robbers-Visser
Igor I. Tulevski
Barbara J. Mulder
Berto J. Bouma
Mark J. Schuuring
Mark J. Schuuring
Mark J. Schuuring
author_sort Maarten A. Koole
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) recommend screening in patients at risk for arrhythmic events. However, the optimal mode of detection is unknown.MethodsBaseline and follow-up data of symptomatic ACHD patients who received an implantable loop recorder (ILR) or who participated in a smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram study were collected. The primary endpoint was time to first detected arrhythmia.ResultsIn total 116 ACHD patients (mean age 42 years, 44% male) were studied. The ILR group (n = 23) differed from the smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram group (n = 93) in having a greater part of males and had more severe CHD and (near) syncope as qualifying diagnosis. In the smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram group history of arrhythmia and palpitations were more frequent (all p < 0.05). Monitoring was performed for 40 and 79 patient-years for the ILR- and smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram group, respectively. Arrhythmias occurred in 33 patients with an equal median time for both groups to first arrhythmia of 3 months (HR of 0.7, p = 0.81). Furthermore, atrial fibrillation occurred most often (n = 16) and common therapy changes included medication changes (n = 7) and implantation of pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) (N = 4). Symptoms or mode of detection were not a determinant of the first event.ConclusionNon-invasive smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram monitoring could be an acceptable alternative for ILR implantation in detecting arrhythmia in symptomatic ACHD patients in respect to diagnostic yield, safety and management decisions, especially in those without syncope.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T00:38:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a061c93158824e8e9d33a19f0a7d46d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T00:38:19Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a061c93158824e8e9d33a19f0a7d46d42023-01-06T13:41:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2023-01-01910.3389/fcvm.2022.10990141099014An implantable loop recorder or smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram to detect arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart disease?Maarten A. Koole0Maarten A. Koole1Maarten A. Koole2Dirkjan Kauw3Kirsten M. Kooiman4Joris R. de Groot5Danielle Robbers-Visser6Igor I. Tulevski7Barbara J. Mulder8Berto J. Bouma9Mark J. Schuuring10Mark J. Schuuring11Mark J. Schuuring12Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsCardiology Centers of the Netherlands, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis Beverwijk, Beverwijk, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsCardiology Centers of the Netherlands, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsNetherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, NetherlandsBackgroundThe European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) recommend screening in patients at risk for arrhythmic events. However, the optimal mode of detection is unknown.MethodsBaseline and follow-up data of symptomatic ACHD patients who received an implantable loop recorder (ILR) or who participated in a smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram study were collected. The primary endpoint was time to first detected arrhythmia.ResultsIn total 116 ACHD patients (mean age 42 years, 44% male) were studied. The ILR group (n = 23) differed from the smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram group (n = 93) in having a greater part of males and had more severe CHD and (near) syncope as qualifying diagnosis. In the smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram group history of arrhythmia and palpitations were more frequent (all p < 0.05). Monitoring was performed for 40 and 79 patient-years for the ILR- and smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram group, respectively. Arrhythmias occurred in 33 patients with an equal median time for both groups to first arrhythmia of 3 months (HR of 0.7, p = 0.81). Furthermore, atrial fibrillation occurred most often (n = 16) and common therapy changes included medication changes (n = 7) and implantation of pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) (N = 4). Symptoms or mode of detection were not a determinant of the first event.ConclusionNon-invasive smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram monitoring could be an acceptable alternative for ILR implantation in detecting arrhythmia in symptomatic ACHD patients in respect to diagnostic yield, safety and management decisions, especially in those without syncope.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1099014/fullarrhythmiascongenital heart diseaseelectrocardiographytelemedicineimplantable loop recordercardiology
spellingShingle Maarten A. Koole
Maarten A. Koole
Maarten A. Koole
Dirkjan Kauw
Kirsten M. Kooiman
Joris R. de Groot
Danielle Robbers-Visser
Igor I. Tulevski
Barbara J. Mulder
Berto J. Bouma
Mark J. Schuuring
Mark J. Schuuring
Mark J. Schuuring
An implantable loop recorder or smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram to detect arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart disease?
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
arrhythmias
congenital heart disease
electrocardiography
telemedicine
implantable loop recorder
cardiology
title An implantable loop recorder or smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram to detect arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart disease?
title_full An implantable loop recorder or smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram to detect arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart disease?
title_fullStr An implantable loop recorder or smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram to detect arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart disease?
title_full_unstemmed An implantable loop recorder or smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram to detect arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart disease?
title_short An implantable loop recorder or smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram to detect arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart disease?
title_sort implantable loop recorder or smartphone based single lead electrocardiogram to detect arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart disease
topic arrhythmias
congenital heart disease
electrocardiography
telemedicine
implantable loop recorder
cardiology
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1099014/full
work_keys_str_mv AT maartenakoole animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT maartenakoole animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT maartenakoole animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT dirkjankauw animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT kirstenmkooiman animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT jorisrdegroot animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT daniellerobbersvisser animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT igoritulevski animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT barbarajmulder animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT bertojbouma animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT markjschuuring animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT markjschuuring animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT markjschuuring animplantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT maartenakoole implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT maartenakoole implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT maartenakoole implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT dirkjankauw implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT kirstenmkooiman implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT jorisrdegroot implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT daniellerobbersvisser implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT igoritulevski implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT barbarajmulder implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT bertojbouma implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT markjschuuring implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT markjschuuring implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT markjschuuring implantablelooprecorderorsmartphonebasedsingleleadelectrocardiogramtodetectarrhythmiainadultswithcongenitalheartdisease