Comparison of contrast sensitivity among welder with three methods of GMAW, SMAW and resistance welding

Introduction: The present study was carried out to compare contrast sensitivity among three groups of professional welders including (1) those who use gas metal Arc welding (GMAW) (2) those who use shield metal Arc welding (SMAW) and the group that uses resistance welding. . Material and Method: In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Maleckpour, E. Jafarzadehpour, A. Mirzajani
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014-07-01
Series:بهداشت و ایمنی کار
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jhsw.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-93&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1818583402188636160
author B. Maleckpour
E. Jafarzadehpour
A. Mirzajani
author_facet B. Maleckpour
E. Jafarzadehpour
A. Mirzajani
author_sort B. Maleckpour
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The present study was carried out to compare contrast sensitivity among three groups of professional welders including (1) those who use gas metal Arc welding (GMAW) (2) those who use shield metal Arc welding (SMAW) and the group that uses resistance welding. . Material and Method: In this research, all the welders who use GMAW, SMAW and resistance welding working in an industry who were all male, performed contrast sensitivity test, using Freiburg. The contrast sensitivity test was done at three spatial frequency of 1cpd, 5cpd and 15 cpd under a constant condition. The three selected groups were similar regarding age and work experience. The result of the three groups at each spatial frequency were recorded and compared with other groups. . Results: ANOVA test showed that decrease contrast sensitivity in spatial frequency of GMAW group at the spatial frequency 15cpd, significantly decrease comparing to SMAW group (p=0.028) and resistance welding group (p=0.041). The mean (SD) of contrast sensitivity at frequency of 1cpd, 5cpd and 15cpd was respectively 140.69±51.8, 172.7±43.75 and 39.8±25.92 for the GMAW group and 157.8±42.2, 183.21±32.01 and 60.57±54.30 for the SMAW group and 149.10±50.68, 180.60±35.42 and 57.38±39.22 for resistance welding. . Conclusion: Although all welders use goggle or other personal protective equipment, loss of contrast sensitivity of GMAW workers can be attributed to the cumulative effects of the radiation.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T08:04:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a06c010047324e02af467d44cdb1709d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-807X
2383-2088
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-16T08:04:42Z
publishDate 2014-07-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series بهداشت و ایمنی کار
spelling doaj.art-a06c010047324e02af467d44cdb1709d2022-12-21T22:38:29ZfasTehran University of Medical Sciencesبهداشت و ایمنی کار2251-807X2383-20882014-07-01422736Comparison of contrast sensitivity among welder with three methods of GMAW, SMAW and resistance weldingB. Maleckpour0E. Jafarzadehpour1A. Mirzajani2 MSc of optometry, optometry department of Rehabilitation Faculty, Iran University of Medical Sciences Associate professor of optometry department of Rehabilitation Faculty, Iran University of Medical Sciences Associate professor of optometry department of Rehabilitation Faculty, Iran University of Medical Sciences Introduction: The present study was carried out to compare contrast sensitivity among three groups of professional welders including (1) those who use gas metal Arc welding (GMAW) (2) those who use shield metal Arc welding (SMAW) and the group that uses resistance welding. . Material and Method: In this research, all the welders who use GMAW, SMAW and resistance welding working in an industry who were all male, performed contrast sensitivity test, using Freiburg. The contrast sensitivity test was done at three spatial frequency of 1cpd, 5cpd and 15 cpd under a constant condition. The three selected groups were similar regarding age and work experience. The result of the three groups at each spatial frequency were recorded and compared with other groups. . Results: ANOVA test showed that decrease contrast sensitivity in spatial frequency of GMAW group at the spatial frequency 15cpd, significantly decrease comparing to SMAW group (p=0.028) and resistance welding group (p=0.041). The mean (SD) of contrast sensitivity at frequency of 1cpd, 5cpd and 15cpd was respectively 140.69±51.8, 172.7±43.75 and 39.8±25.92 for the GMAW group and 157.8±42.2, 183.21±32.01 and 60.57±54.30 for the SMAW group and 149.10±50.68, 180.60±35.42 and 57.38±39.22 for resistance welding. . Conclusion: Although all welders use goggle or other personal protective equipment, loss of contrast sensitivity of GMAW workers can be attributed to the cumulative effects of the radiation.http://jhsw.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-93&slc_lang=en&sid=1Ultraviolet radiation Contrast sensitivity test Arc welding Resistance welding Spatial frequency Eye safety
spellingShingle B. Maleckpour
E. Jafarzadehpour
A. Mirzajani
Comparison of contrast sensitivity among welder with three methods of GMAW, SMAW and resistance welding
بهداشت و ایمنی کار
Ultraviolet radiation
Contrast sensitivity test
Arc welding
Resistance welding
Spatial frequency
Eye safety
title Comparison of contrast sensitivity among welder with three methods of GMAW, SMAW and resistance welding
title_full Comparison of contrast sensitivity among welder with three methods of GMAW, SMAW and resistance welding
title_fullStr Comparison of contrast sensitivity among welder with three methods of GMAW, SMAW and resistance welding
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of contrast sensitivity among welder with three methods of GMAW, SMAW and resistance welding
title_short Comparison of contrast sensitivity among welder with three methods of GMAW, SMAW and resistance welding
title_sort comparison of contrast sensitivity among welder with three methods of gmaw smaw and resistance welding
topic Ultraviolet radiation
Contrast sensitivity test
Arc welding
Resistance welding
Spatial frequency
Eye safety
url http://jhsw.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-93&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT bmaleckpour comparisonofcontrastsensitivityamongwelderwiththreemethodsofgmawsmawandresistancewelding
AT ejafarzadehpour comparisonofcontrastsensitivityamongwelderwiththreemethodsofgmawsmawandresistancewelding
AT amirzajani comparisonofcontrastsensitivityamongwelderwiththreemethodsofgmawsmawandresistancewelding