Mythologie et psychologie

Despite extravagant contents, which go far beyond so-called “normal” behaviours, mythology is not the pathological narrative to which psychologists or psychoanalysts are inclined to confine it. On the contrary, mythologists have neglected the omnipresence of psychic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jacquy Chemouni
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Presses universitaires de Caen 2002-12-01
Series:Kentron
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/kentron/1917
_version_ 1818561145474121728
author Jacquy Chemouni
author_facet Jacquy Chemouni
author_sort Jacquy Chemouni
collection DOAJ
description Despite extravagant contents, which go far beyond so-called “normal” behaviours, mythology is not the pathological narrative to which psychologists or psychoanalysts are inclined to confine it. On the contrary, mythologists have neglected the omnipresence of psychic immoderateness. Their analyses draw no conclusions from the presence of the monsters, matricides, patricides, infanticides, incests, etc., which that are tremendously present in myths.The present article aims to demonstrate that the “psychological” contents of mythological narratives should be thoroughly considered. However, contrary to psychoanalysts’ or psychologists’ assertions, mythology escapes any attempt at nosographic analysis. The author explains why mythic narratives are full of behaviours that are now classified as pathological, and why these should not be considered as reflecting pathological lived experience. This apparent paradox disappears once one understands that mythology was the first dynamic psychology that humanity invented in order to explain the depths of the psyche.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T00:47:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a06e71b516da4544bfd9e9092dfc92e2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0765-0590
2264-1459
language fra
last_indexed 2024-12-14T00:47:10Z
publishDate 2002-12-01
publisher Presses universitaires de Caen
record_format Article
series Kentron
spelling doaj.art-a06e71b516da4544bfd9e9092dfc92e22022-12-21T23:24:03ZfraPresses universitaires de CaenKentron0765-05902264-14592002-12-011892710.4000/kentron.1917Mythologie et psychologieJacquy ChemouniDespite extravagant contents, which go far beyond so-called “normal” behaviours, mythology is not the pathological narrative to which psychologists or psychoanalysts are inclined to confine it. On the contrary, mythologists have neglected the omnipresence of psychic immoderateness. Their analyses draw no conclusions from the presence of the monsters, matricides, patricides, infanticides, incests, etc., which that are tremendously present in myths.The present article aims to demonstrate that the “psychological” contents of mythological narratives should be thoroughly considered. However, contrary to psychoanalysts’ or psychologists’ assertions, mythology escapes any attempt at nosographic analysis. The author explains why mythic narratives are full of behaviours that are now classified as pathological, and why these should not be considered as reflecting pathological lived experience. This apparent paradox disappears once one understands that mythology was the first dynamic psychology that humanity invented in order to explain the depths of the psyche.http://journals.openedition.org/kentron/1917
spellingShingle Jacquy Chemouni
Mythologie et psychologie
Kentron
title Mythologie et psychologie
title_full Mythologie et psychologie
title_fullStr Mythologie et psychologie
title_full_unstemmed Mythologie et psychologie
title_short Mythologie et psychologie
title_sort mythologie et psychologie
url http://journals.openedition.org/kentron/1917
work_keys_str_mv AT jacquychemouni mythologieetpsychologie