The effectiveness of minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration, velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes: A randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted treatment of palatally impacted canines (PICs) compared with the traditional method by evaluating treatment time, the velocity of movement, and the associated dentoalveolar changes. Materials and methods: Forty-six...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Younis Hajeer, Omar Heshmeh, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Mahran R. Mousa, Ahmad S. Burhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2023-06-01
Series:F1000Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/12-699/v1
_version_ 1797643681072676864
author Mohammad Younis Hajeer
Omar Heshmeh
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Mahran R. Mousa
Ahmad S. Burhan
author_facet Mohammad Younis Hajeer
Omar Heshmeh
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Mahran R. Mousa
Ahmad S. Burhan
author_sort Mohammad Younis Hajeer
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted treatment of palatally impacted canines (PICs) compared with the traditional method by evaluating treatment time, the velocity of movement, and the associated dentoalveolar changes. Materials and methods: Forty-six patients with palatally or mid-alveolar upper impacted canines were recruited and distributed into two groups: the corticotomy-assisted traction group (CAT group, mean age: 20.39±2.27 years) and the traditional treatment group (TT group, mean age: 20.26±2.17 years). The closed surgical approach was used in both study groups. The velocity of traction movement, traction duration and overall treatment duration were evaluated clinically. In addition, the bone support ratios and the amount of root resorption were assessed on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Results: At the end of treatment, significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the velocity of traction movement, traction time, and overall treatment time (P<0.05). The mean velocity of traction movement in the CAT group was greater than the TT group (x velocity =1.15±0.35 mm/month; 0.70±0.33 mm/month, P=0.027, respectively). The duration of the active traction and the overall orthodontic treatment in the CAT group were significantly shorter than the TT group by 36% and 29%, respectively. The mean bone support ratios of the aligned canines did not differ significantly between the two groups (88% vs. 89% in the CAT and TT groups, respectively). No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the mean amount of root resorption on the adjacent laterals (x resorption = 1.30±1.18 mm; 1.22±1.02 mm, P=0.612, in CAT and TT groups, respectively). Conclusions: The traction movement velocity of the palatally impacted canines can be increased using minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment. The side effects of the acceleration procedure were minimal and almost similar to those of the traditional technique.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:18:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a072874fc5ab49b9a416fd93e6d9e698
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-1402
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:18:25Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
record_format Article
series F1000Research
spelling doaj.art-a072874fc5ab49b9a416fd93e6d9e6982023-11-01T01:00:02ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022023-06-0112148452The effectiveness of minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration, velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes: A randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]Mohammad Younis Hajeer0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0640-1297Omar Heshmeh1Mohammad Khursheed Alam2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-1752Mahran R. Mousa3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7048-4723Ahmad S. Burhan4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0727-2653Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, Damascus, SyriaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, Damascus, SyriaOrthodontic Division, Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, 72345, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, Damascus, SyriaDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, Damascus, SyriaObjective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted treatment of palatally impacted canines (PICs) compared with the traditional method by evaluating treatment time, the velocity of movement, and the associated dentoalveolar changes. Materials and methods: Forty-six patients with palatally or mid-alveolar upper impacted canines were recruited and distributed into two groups: the corticotomy-assisted traction group (CAT group, mean age: 20.39±2.27 years) and the traditional treatment group (TT group, mean age: 20.26±2.17 years). The closed surgical approach was used in both study groups. The velocity of traction movement, traction duration and overall treatment duration were evaluated clinically. In addition, the bone support ratios and the amount of root resorption were assessed on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Results: At the end of treatment, significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the velocity of traction movement, traction time, and overall treatment time (P<0.05). The mean velocity of traction movement in the CAT group was greater than the TT group (x velocity =1.15±0.35 mm/month; 0.70±0.33 mm/month, P=0.027, respectively). The duration of the active traction and the overall orthodontic treatment in the CAT group were significantly shorter than the TT group by 36% and 29%, respectively. The mean bone support ratios of the aligned canines did not differ significantly between the two groups (88% vs. 89% in the CAT and TT groups, respectively). No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the mean amount of root resorption on the adjacent laterals (x resorption = 1.30±1.18 mm; 1.22±1.02 mm, P=0.612, in CAT and TT groups, respectively). Conclusions: The traction movement velocity of the palatally impacted canines can be increased using minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment. The side effects of the acceleration procedure were minimal and almost similar to those of the traditional technique.https://f1000research.com/articles/12-699/v1Upper impacted canine palatally impacted canine unerupted canine forced eruption orthodontic treatmenteng
spellingShingle Mohammad Younis Hajeer
Omar Heshmeh
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Mahran R. Mousa
Ahmad S. Burhan
The effectiveness of minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration, velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes: A randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
F1000Research
Upper impacted canine
palatally impacted canine
unerupted canine
forced eruption
orthodontic
treatment
eng
title The effectiveness of minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration, velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes: A randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full The effectiveness of minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration, velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes: A randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr The effectiveness of minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration, velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes: A randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration, velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes: A randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short The effectiveness of minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration, velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes: A randomized controlled trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort effectiveness of minimally invasive corticotomy assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes a randomized controlled trial version 1 peer review 2 approved
topic Upper impacted canine
palatally impacted canine
unerupted canine
forced eruption
orthodontic
treatment
eng
url https://f1000research.com/articles/12-699/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadyounishajeer theeffectivenessofminimallyinvasivecorticotomyassistedorthodontictreatmentofpalatallyimpactedcaninescomparedtothetraditionaltractionmethodintermsoftreatmentdurationvelocityoftractionmovementandtheassociateddentoalveolarchangesarandomizedcontrolledtrialver
AT omarheshmeh theeffectivenessofminimallyinvasivecorticotomyassistedorthodontictreatmentofpalatallyimpactedcaninescomparedtothetraditionaltractionmethodintermsoftreatmentdurationvelocityoftractionmovementandtheassociateddentoalveolarchangesarandomizedcontrolledtrialver
AT mohammadkhursheedalam theeffectivenessofminimallyinvasivecorticotomyassistedorthodontictreatmentofpalatallyimpactedcaninescomparedtothetraditionaltractionmethodintermsoftreatmentdurationvelocityoftractionmovementandtheassociateddentoalveolarchangesarandomizedcontrolledtrialver
AT mahranrmousa theeffectivenessofminimallyinvasivecorticotomyassistedorthodontictreatmentofpalatallyimpactedcaninescomparedtothetraditionaltractionmethodintermsoftreatmentdurationvelocityoftractionmovementandtheassociateddentoalveolarchangesarandomizedcontrolledtrialver
AT ahmadsburhan theeffectivenessofminimallyinvasivecorticotomyassistedorthodontictreatmentofpalatallyimpactedcaninescomparedtothetraditionaltractionmethodintermsoftreatmentdurationvelocityoftractionmovementandtheassociateddentoalveolarchangesarandomizedcontrolledtrialver
AT mohammadyounishajeer effectivenessofminimallyinvasivecorticotomyassistedorthodontictreatmentofpalatallyimpactedcaninescomparedtothetraditionaltractionmethodintermsoftreatmentdurationvelocityoftractionmovementandtheassociateddentoalveolarchangesarandomizedcontrolledtrialversio
AT omarheshmeh effectivenessofminimallyinvasivecorticotomyassistedorthodontictreatmentofpalatallyimpactedcaninescomparedtothetraditionaltractionmethodintermsoftreatmentdurationvelocityoftractionmovementandtheassociateddentoalveolarchangesarandomizedcontrolledtrialversio
AT mohammadkhursheedalam effectivenessofminimallyinvasivecorticotomyassistedorthodontictreatmentofpalatallyimpactedcaninescomparedtothetraditionaltractionmethodintermsoftreatmentdurationvelocityoftractionmovementandtheassociateddentoalveolarchangesarandomizedcontrolledtrialversio
AT mahranrmousa effectivenessofminimallyinvasivecorticotomyassistedorthodontictreatmentofpalatallyimpactedcaninescomparedtothetraditionaltractionmethodintermsoftreatmentdurationvelocityoftractionmovementandtheassociateddentoalveolarchangesarandomizedcontrolledtrialversio
AT ahmadsburhan effectivenessofminimallyinvasivecorticotomyassistedorthodontictreatmentofpalatallyimpactedcaninescomparedtothetraditionaltractionmethodintermsoftreatmentdurationvelocityoftractionmovementandtheassociateddentoalveolarchangesarandomizedcontrolledtrialversio