How to Avoid False-Negative and False-Positive COVID-19 PCR Testing

Background: Up to 40% of test results for COVID-19 in the presence of clinical manifestations of the disease might be negative. The reason for a false-negative result might originate from any step of the analysis: poor-quality or empty swab, poor RNA isolation, inactivation of reverse transcriptase...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irina Fevraleva, Olga Glinshchikova, Tatiana Makarik, Andrey Sudarikov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:International Journal of Translational Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8937/2/2/18
_version_ 1797486310659719168
author Irina Fevraleva
Olga Glinshchikova
Tatiana Makarik
Andrey Sudarikov
author_facet Irina Fevraleva
Olga Glinshchikova
Tatiana Makarik
Andrey Sudarikov
author_sort Irina Fevraleva
collection DOAJ
description Background: Up to 40% of test results for COVID-19 in the presence of clinical manifestations of the disease might be negative. The reason for a false-negative result might originate from any step of the analysis: poor-quality or empty swab, poor RNA isolation, inactivation of reverse transcriptase or Taq polymerase in the test. Methods: Here we describe a PCR approach for SARS-CoV-2 detection with swab quality and integrity controlled by human <i>ABL1</i> mRNA amplification. Designed primers work with the cDNA of the <i>ABL1</i> gene, not genomic DNA. Results: The simultaneous appearance of three signals corresponding to the nucleocapsid, spike, and <i>ABL1</i> gene indicates infection with the Omicron strain. The amplification of <i>ABL1</i> gene and nucleocapsid only indicate other than Omicron infection. The appearance of ABL1 amplification only indicates a true negative result for SARS-CoV-2. All other variants are null and void. Conclusions: A system has been developed for multiplex PCR diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2, which makes it possible to eliminate errors leading to false-negative and false-positive results at all stages of analysis. This is accomplished by the presence of specific primers for human RNA, controlling proper swab application, handling, and all the stages of RT-PCR.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:31:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a07cd55bc3e541268415b9ab5338489c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-8937
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:31:22Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series International Journal of Translational Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a07cd55bc3e541268415b9ab5338489c2023-11-23T17:08:47ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Translational Medicine2673-89372022-06-012220420910.3390/ijtm2020018How to Avoid False-Negative and False-Positive COVID-19 PCR TestingIrina Fevraleva0Olga Glinshchikova1Tatiana Makarik2Andrey Sudarikov3National Medical Research Center for Hematology, 125167 Moscow, RussiaNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, 125167 Moscow, RussiaNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, 125167 Moscow, RussiaNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, 125167 Moscow, RussiaBackground: Up to 40% of test results for COVID-19 in the presence of clinical manifestations of the disease might be negative. The reason for a false-negative result might originate from any step of the analysis: poor-quality or empty swab, poor RNA isolation, inactivation of reverse transcriptase or Taq polymerase in the test. Methods: Here we describe a PCR approach for SARS-CoV-2 detection with swab quality and integrity controlled by human <i>ABL1</i> mRNA amplification. Designed primers work with the cDNA of the <i>ABL1</i> gene, not genomic DNA. Results: The simultaneous appearance of three signals corresponding to the nucleocapsid, spike, and <i>ABL1</i> gene indicates infection with the Omicron strain. The amplification of <i>ABL1</i> gene and nucleocapsid only indicate other than Omicron infection. The appearance of ABL1 amplification only indicates a true negative result for SARS-CoV-2. All other variants are null and void. Conclusions: A system has been developed for multiplex PCR diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2, which makes it possible to eliminate errors leading to false-negative and false-positive results at all stages of analysis. This is accomplished by the presence of specific primers for human RNA, controlling proper swab application, handling, and all the stages of RT-PCR.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8937/2/2/18COVID-19SARS-CoV-2RT-PCR
spellingShingle Irina Fevraleva
Olga Glinshchikova
Tatiana Makarik
Andrey Sudarikov
How to Avoid False-Negative and False-Positive COVID-19 PCR Testing
International Journal of Translational Medicine
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
RT-PCR
title How to Avoid False-Negative and False-Positive COVID-19 PCR Testing
title_full How to Avoid False-Negative and False-Positive COVID-19 PCR Testing
title_fullStr How to Avoid False-Negative and False-Positive COVID-19 PCR Testing
title_full_unstemmed How to Avoid False-Negative and False-Positive COVID-19 PCR Testing
title_short How to Avoid False-Negative and False-Positive COVID-19 PCR Testing
title_sort how to avoid false negative and false positive covid 19 pcr testing
topic COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
RT-PCR
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8937/2/2/18
work_keys_str_mv AT irinafevraleva howtoavoidfalsenegativeandfalsepositivecovid19pcrtesting
AT olgaglinshchikova howtoavoidfalsenegativeandfalsepositivecovid19pcrtesting
AT tatianamakarik howtoavoidfalsenegativeandfalsepositivecovid19pcrtesting
AT andreysudarikov howtoavoidfalsenegativeandfalsepositivecovid19pcrtesting