Understanding Resemblance in Depiction: What Can we Learn from Wittgenstein?

Wittgenstein’s remarks on “seeing-as” have influenced several scholars working on depiction. They have especially inspired those who think that in order to understand depiction we should understand the specific kind of visual experience depictions arouse in the viewer (e.g. Gombrich [1960], Wollheim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elisa Caldarola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2013-05-01
Series:Aisthesis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/658
_version_ 1818896610793357312
author Elisa Caldarola
author_facet Elisa Caldarola
author_sort Elisa Caldarola
collection DOAJ
description Wittgenstein’s remarks on “seeing-as” have influenced several scholars working on depiction. They have especially inspired those who think that in order to understand depiction we should understand the specific kind of visual experience depictions arouse in the viewer (e.g. Gombrich [1960], Wollheim [1968; 1987]). In this paper I would like to go a different way. My hypothesis is that certain of Wittgenstein’s claims both in the Tractatus and in his later writings resonate well within the context of an objective resemblance account of depiction (Hyman, 2006).
first_indexed 2024-12-19T19:03:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a07e29d83ea54cb9ada438c0977e5d76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2035-8466
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T19:03:01Z
publishDate 2013-05-01
publisher Firenze University Press
record_format Article
series Aisthesis
spelling doaj.art-a07e29d83ea54cb9ada438c0977e5d762022-12-21T20:09:30ZengFirenze University PressAisthesis2035-84662013-05-0161Understanding Resemblance in Depiction: What Can we Learn from Wittgenstein?Elisa CaldarolaWittgenstein’s remarks on “seeing-as” have influenced several scholars working on depiction. They have especially inspired those who think that in order to understand depiction we should understand the specific kind of visual experience depictions arouse in the viewer (e.g. Gombrich [1960], Wollheim [1968; 1987]). In this paper I would like to go a different way. My hypothesis is that certain of Wittgenstein’s claims both in the Tractatus and in his later writings resonate well within the context of an objective resemblance account of depiction (Hyman, 2006).https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/658Ludwig WittgensteinAestheticsJohn Hyman
spellingShingle Elisa Caldarola
Understanding Resemblance in Depiction: What Can we Learn from Wittgenstein?
Aisthesis
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Aesthetics
John Hyman
title Understanding Resemblance in Depiction: What Can we Learn from Wittgenstein?
title_full Understanding Resemblance in Depiction: What Can we Learn from Wittgenstein?
title_fullStr Understanding Resemblance in Depiction: What Can we Learn from Wittgenstein?
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Resemblance in Depiction: What Can we Learn from Wittgenstein?
title_short Understanding Resemblance in Depiction: What Can we Learn from Wittgenstein?
title_sort understanding resemblance in depiction what can we learn from wittgenstein
topic Ludwig Wittgenstein
Aesthetics
John Hyman
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/658
work_keys_str_mv AT elisacaldarola understandingresemblanceindepictionwhatcanwelearnfromwittgenstein