A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography

Electrocochleography (ECochG) is a potential clinically valuable technique for predicting speech perception outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients, among other uses. Current analysis is limited by an inability to quantify hair cell and neural contributions which are mixed in the ongoing part o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatyana E. Fontenot, Christopher K. Giardina, Douglas C. Fitzpatrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00592/full
_version_ 1817976412502491136
author Tatyana E. Fontenot
Christopher K. Giardina
Douglas C. Fitzpatrick
Douglas C. Fitzpatrick
author_facet Tatyana E. Fontenot
Christopher K. Giardina
Douglas C. Fitzpatrick
Douglas C. Fitzpatrick
author_sort Tatyana E. Fontenot
collection DOAJ
description Electrocochleography (ECochG) is a potential clinically valuable technique for predicting speech perception outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients, among other uses. Current analysis is limited by an inability to quantify hair cell and neural contributions which are mixed in the ongoing part of the response to low frequency tones. Here, we used a model based on source properties to account for recorded waveform shapes and to separate the combined signal into its components. The model for the cochlear microphonic (CM) was a sinusoid with parameters for independent saturation of the peaks and the troughs of the responses. The model for the auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) was the convolution of a unit potential and population cycle histogram with a parameter for spread of excitation. Phases of the ANN and CM were additional parameters. The average cycle from the ongoing response was the input, and adaptive fitting identified CM and ANN parameters that best reproduced the waveform shape. Test datasets were responses recorded from the round windows of CI recipients, from the round window of gerbils before and after application of neurotoxins, and with simulated signals where each parameter could be manipulated in isolation. Waveforms recorded from 284 CI recipients had a variety of morphologies that the model fit with an average r2 of 0.97 ± 0.058 (standard deviation). With simulated signals, small systematic differences between outputs and inputs were seen with some variable combinations, but in general there were limited interactions among the parameters. In gerbils, the CM reported was relatively unaffected by the neurotoxins. In contrast, the ANN was strongly reduced and the reduction was limited to frequencies of 1,000 Hz and lower, consistent with the range of strong neural phase-locking. Across human CI subjects, the ANN contribution was variable, ranging from nearly none to larger than the CM. Development of this model could provide a means to isolate hair cell and neural activity that are mixed in the ongoing response to low-frequency tones. This tool can help characterize the residual physiology across CI subjects, and can be useful in other clinical settings where a description of the cochlear physiology is desirable.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T22:03:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a0868f4d88d54e3984ab7219e81a2764
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T22:03:11Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-a0868f4d88d54e3984ab7219e81a27642022-12-22T02:28:02ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2017-10-011110.3389/fnins.2017.00592262795A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using ElectrocochleographyTatyana E. Fontenot0Christopher K. Giardina1Douglas C. Fitzpatrick2Douglas C. Fitzpatrick3Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United StatesSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United StatesOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United StatesSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United StatesElectrocochleography (ECochG) is a potential clinically valuable technique for predicting speech perception outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients, among other uses. Current analysis is limited by an inability to quantify hair cell and neural contributions which are mixed in the ongoing part of the response to low frequency tones. Here, we used a model based on source properties to account for recorded waveform shapes and to separate the combined signal into its components. The model for the cochlear microphonic (CM) was a sinusoid with parameters for independent saturation of the peaks and the troughs of the responses. The model for the auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) was the convolution of a unit potential and population cycle histogram with a parameter for spread of excitation. Phases of the ANN and CM were additional parameters. The average cycle from the ongoing response was the input, and adaptive fitting identified CM and ANN parameters that best reproduced the waveform shape. Test datasets were responses recorded from the round windows of CI recipients, from the round window of gerbils before and after application of neurotoxins, and with simulated signals where each parameter could be manipulated in isolation. Waveforms recorded from 284 CI recipients had a variety of morphologies that the model fit with an average r2 of 0.97 ± 0.058 (standard deviation). With simulated signals, small systematic differences between outputs and inputs were seen with some variable combinations, but in general there were limited interactions among the parameters. In gerbils, the CM reported was relatively unaffected by the neurotoxins. In contrast, the ANN was strongly reduced and the reduction was limited to frequencies of 1,000 Hz and lower, consistent with the range of strong neural phase-locking. Across human CI subjects, the ANN contribution was variable, ranging from nearly none to larger than the CM. Development of this model could provide a means to isolate hair cell and neural activity that are mixed in the ongoing response to low-frequency tones. This tool can help characterize the residual physiology across CI subjects, and can be useful in other clinical settings where a description of the cochlear physiology is desirable.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00592/fullcochlear physiologyelectrophysiologyauditory hair cellsauditory nerveauditory nerve modelcomputational modeling
spellingShingle Tatyana E. Fontenot
Christopher K. Giardina
Douglas C. Fitzpatrick
Douglas C. Fitzpatrick
A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
Frontiers in Neuroscience
cochlear physiology
electrophysiology
auditory hair cells
auditory nerve
auditory nerve model
computational modeling
title A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
title_full A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
title_fullStr A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
title_full_unstemmed A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
title_short A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
title_sort model based approach for separating the cochlear microphonic from the auditory nerve neurophonic in the ongoing response using electrocochleography
topic cochlear physiology
electrophysiology
auditory hair cells
auditory nerve
auditory nerve model
computational modeling
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00592/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tatyanaefontenot amodelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT christopherkgiardina amodelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT douglascfitzpatrick amodelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT douglascfitzpatrick amodelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT tatyanaefontenot modelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT christopherkgiardina modelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT douglascfitzpatrick modelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT douglascfitzpatrick modelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography