Workforce preparedness for disasters: perceptions of clinical and non-clinical staff at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Abstract Background Most U.S. studies on workforce preparedness have a narrow scope, focusing primarily on perceptions of clinical staff in a single hospital and for one type of disaster. In contrast, this study compares the perceptions of workplace disaster preparedness among both clinical and non-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aram Dobalian, Michelle D. Balut, Claudia Der-Martirosian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09597-2
_version_ 1818552323406823424
author Aram Dobalian
Michelle D. Balut
Claudia Der-Martirosian
author_facet Aram Dobalian
Michelle D. Balut
Claudia Der-Martirosian
author_sort Aram Dobalian
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Most U.S. studies on workforce preparedness have a narrow scope, focusing primarily on perceptions of clinical staff in a single hospital and for one type of disaster. In contrast, this study compares the perceptions of workplace disaster preparedness among both clinical and non-clinical staff at all U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical facilities nationwide for three types of disasters (natural, epidemic/pandemic, and manmade). Methods The VA Preparedness Survey used a stratified simple random, web-based survey (fielded from October through December 2018) of all employees at VA medical facilities. We conducted bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to compare the sociodemographic characteristics and perceptions of disaster preparedness between clinical and non-clinical VA staff. Results The study population included 4026 VA employees (2488 clinicians and 1538 non-clinicians). Overall, VA staff were less confident in their medical facility’s ability to respond to epidemic/pandemics and manmade disasters. Depending on the type of disaster, clinical staff, compared to non-clinical staff, were less likely to be confident in their VA medical facility’s ability to respond to natural disasters (OR:0.78, 95% CI:0.67–0.93, p < 0.01), pandemics (OR:0.82, 95% CI:0.70–0.96, p < 0.05), and manmade disasters (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63–0.86, p < 0.001). On the other hand, clinicians, compared to non-clinicians, were 1.45 to 1.78 more likely to perceive their role in disaster response to be important (natural OR:1.57, 95% CI:1.32–1.87; pandemic OR:1.78, 95% CI:1.51–2.10; manmade: OR:1.45; 95% CI: 1.23–1.71; p’s < 0.001), and 1.27 to 1.29 more likely to want additional trainings to prepare for all three types of disasters (natural OR:1.29, 95% CI:1.10–1.51; pandemic OR:1.27, 95% CI:1.08–1.49; manmade OR:1.29; 95% CI:1.09–1.52; p’s < 0.01). Clinicians were more likely to be women, younger, and more educated (p’s < 0.001) than non-clinicians. Compared to clinicians, non-clinical staff had been employed longer with the VA (p < 0.025) and were more likely to have served in the U.S. Armed Forces (p < 0.001). Conclusions These findings suggest both a desire and a need for additional training, particularly for clinicians, and with a focus on epidemics/pandemics and manmade disasters. Training programs should underscore the importance of non-clinical roles when responding to disasters.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T09:11:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a08ba360a57543b58edc8b252cdcb191
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T09:11:42Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-a08ba360a57543b58edc8b252cdcb1912022-12-22T00:29:29ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582020-10-012011910.1186/s12889-020-09597-2Workforce preparedness for disasters: perceptions of clinical and non-clinical staff at the U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsAram Dobalian0Michelle D. Balut1Claudia Der-Martirosian2Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsAbstract Background Most U.S. studies on workforce preparedness have a narrow scope, focusing primarily on perceptions of clinical staff in a single hospital and for one type of disaster. In contrast, this study compares the perceptions of workplace disaster preparedness among both clinical and non-clinical staff at all U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical facilities nationwide for three types of disasters (natural, epidemic/pandemic, and manmade). Methods The VA Preparedness Survey used a stratified simple random, web-based survey (fielded from October through December 2018) of all employees at VA medical facilities. We conducted bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to compare the sociodemographic characteristics and perceptions of disaster preparedness between clinical and non-clinical VA staff. Results The study population included 4026 VA employees (2488 clinicians and 1538 non-clinicians). Overall, VA staff were less confident in their medical facility’s ability to respond to epidemic/pandemics and manmade disasters. Depending on the type of disaster, clinical staff, compared to non-clinical staff, were less likely to be confident in their VA medical facility’s ability to respond to natural disasters (OR:0.78, 95% CI:0.67–0.93, p < 0.01), pandemics (OR:0.82, 95% CI:0.70–0.96, p < 0.05), and manmade disasters (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63–0.86, p < 0.001). On the other hand, clinicians, compared to non-clinicians, were 1.45 to 1.78 more likely to perceive their role in disaster response to be important (natural OR:1.57, 95% CI:1.32–1.87; pandemic OR:1.78, 95% CI:1.51–2.10; manmade: OR:1.45; 95% CI: 1.23–1.71; p’s < 0.001), and 1.27 to 1.29 more likely to want additional trainings to prepare for all three types of disasters (natural OR:1.29, 95% CI:1.10–1.51; pandemic OR:1.27, 95% CI:1.08–1.49; manmade OR:1.29; 95% CI:1.09–1.52; p’s < 0.01). Clinicians were more likely to be women, younger, and more educated (p’s < 0.001) than non-clinicians. Compared to clinicians, non-clinical staff had been employed longer with the VA (p < 0.025) and were more likely to have served in the U.S. Armed Forces (p < 0.001). Conclusions These findings suggest both a desire and a need for additional training, particularly for clinicians, and with a focus on epidemics/pandemics and manmade disasters. Training programs should underscore the importance of non-clinical roles when responding to disasters.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09597-2CliniciansNon-cliniciansWorkforce preparednessNatural disastersEpidemicsPandemics
spellingShingle Aram Dobalian
Michelle D. Balut
Claudia Der-Martirosian
Workforce preparedness for disasters: perceptions of clinical and non-clinical staff at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
BMC Public Health
Clinicians
Non-clinicians
Workforce preparedness
Natural disasters
Epidemics
Pandemics
title Workforce preparedness for disasters: perceptions of clinical and non-clinical staff at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
title_full Workforce preparedness for disasters: perceptions of clinical and non-clinical staff at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
title_fullStr Workforce preparedness for disasters: perceptions of clinical and non-clinical staff at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
title_full_unstemmed Workforce preparedness for disasters: perceptions of clinical and non-clinical staff at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
title_short Workforce preparedness for disasters: perceptions of clinical and non-clinical staff at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
title_sort workforce preparedness for disasters perceptions of clinical and non clinical staff at the u s department of veterans affairs
topic Clinicians
Non-clinicians
Workforce preparedness
Natural disasters
Epidemics
Pandemics
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09597-2
work_keys_str_mv AT aramdobalian workforcepreparednessfordisastersperceptionsofclinicalandnonclinicalstaffattheusdepartmentofveteransaffairs
AT michelledbalut workforcepreparednessfordisastersperceptionsofclinicalandnonclinicalstaffattheusdepartmentofveteransaffairs
AT claudiadermartirosian workforcepreparednessfordisastersperceptionsofclinicalandnonclinicalstaffattheusdepartmentofveteransaffairs