Anders lees, sien, praat en glo � �n antwoord op ander se lees van �Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees�
<strong>To read, see, talk and believe differently � a response to other readers� reading of �Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees�<strong> </strong></strong><p><strong></strong>As any exegesis is necessarily preceded by certain theological co...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Afrikaans |
| Published: |
AOSIS
2010-03-01
|
| Series: | Verbum et Ecclesia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/VE/article/view/303 |
| _version_ | 1811289180109537280 |
|---|---|
| author | Gerrie Snyman |
| author_facet | Gerrie Snyman |
| author_sort | Gerrie Snyman |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <strong>To read, see, talk and believe differently � a response to other readers� reading of �Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees�<strong> </strong></strong><p><strong></strong>As any exegesis is necessarily preceded by certain theological convictions, the author of the book <em>Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees</em> (2007) responds to criticism on the book flowing from a seminar � especially the remarks made by Hans van Deventer and Jurie le Roux. Firstly, the ideas on a changed view of the deity are discussed. This conversation is augmented by a discussion of the criticism levelled at the idea that reading the Bible has consequences for other people, and that a different reading would lead to a different concept of God. Van Deventer�s comments regarding the difficulty of debating theological issues are strengthened by a critical discussion of a debate in <em>Die Kerkblad</em> regarding the grammatical-historical method. His critical remarks regarding the value of a historical consciousness are discussed by way of a question on the relationship between a liberal theology and a conservative political point of view. Le Roux�s struggle with Snyman�s utilisation of apartheid as a rhetorical strategy leads the discussion to a recent example of overcoming racism while using unreflectingly racist imagery. This example indicates how theology effects cosmetic changes, without taking on the real issue. For this reason, the author concludes that a critical reading of the own Western tradition in Africa has become necessary.</p><p>�</p><p><em>--- Abstract translated into Sipedi</em> ---</p><p><strong>Go bala, go bona, go bolela le go dumela ka go fapana - go arabela go balwa ga 'Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees' ke babadi ba bangwe</strong></p><p>Bjale ka ge go fetleka Bibele go etwa pele ke ditumelo t�a go tiba t�a teologi, mongwadi wa <em>Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees</em> (2007) o arabela ditsholo t�a puku ye t�eo di tswet�wego ke seminare ye e fetilego - kudu ditshwayotshwayo t�a Hans van Deventer le Jurie le Roux. Sa pele, go ahlaahlwa dikgopolo t�e fetogilego ka Modimo. Poledi�ano ye e tlat�wa ke go ahlaahla tsholo ye e lebanywago le gore go bala Bibele go na le khuet�o ye itsego go batho ba bangwe, le gore go bala ka tsela ya go fapana go tlo tli�a kgopolo ya go fo�agala ka Modimo. Ditshwayotshwayo t�a Van Deventer mabapi le bothata bja go ngangi�ana ka ditaba t�a teologi di loi�wa ke go ahlaahla ka tsholo ka go <em>Die Kerkblad</em> poledi�ano mabapi le mokgwa wa go hlatholla Bibele ka go sekaseka popopolelo(gramatika) le histori ya tlholego ya yona. Ditshwayotshwayo t�a gagwe mabapi le mohola wa boitemogo bja go tli�wa ke histori di ahlaahlwa ka tsela ya pot�i�o tswalanong ya teologi ya tokologo le kgopolo ya sepoloiki ya go gana diphetogo. Bothata bja Le Roux mabapi le kgopolo ya Snyman ya go re kgethollo go ya ka merafe e �omi�wa e le tsela ya go t�hela phori mahlong e i�a poledi�ano ye go mohlala wo e sego wa kgale wa go fenya semorafe ka go �omi�a seswant�hokgopolo sa semorafe sa pepeneng. Mohlala wo o laet�a ka fao teologi e amago diphetogo t�a ka mehla maphelong a batho ntle le go lebanya ditaba t�a paale thwii. Ka lona lebaka leo, mongwadi o ruma ka go re go bala set�o sa batho ba Bodikela mo Afrika ka tshekatsheko le phetleko ya go tiba go tloga go nyakega.</p><p><em>--- End of translation ---</em></p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:50:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a093315d4ff7421bb2c287884d64a884 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1609-9982 2074-7705 |
| language | Afrikaans |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:50:19Z |
| publishDate | 2010-03-01 |
| publisher | AOSIS |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verbum et Ecclesia |
| spelling | doaj.art-a093315d4ff7421bb2c287884d64a8842022-12-22T03:03:51ZafrAOSISVerbum et Ecclesia1609-99822074-77052010-03-0131110.4102/ve.v31i1.303324Anders lees, sien, praat en glo � �n antwoord op ander se lees van �Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees�Gerrie Snyman0University of South Africa<strong>To read, see, talk and believe differently � a response to other readers� reading of �Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees�<strong> </strong></strong><p><strong></strong>As any exegesis is necessarily preceded by certain theological convictions, the author of the book <em>Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees</em> (2007) responds to criticism on the book flowing from a seminar � especially the remarks made by Hans van Deventer and Jurie le Roux. Firstly, the ideas on a changed view of the deity are discussed. This conversation is augmented by a discussion of the criticism levelled at the idea that reading the Bible has consequences for other people, and that a different reading would lead to a different concept of God. Van Deventer�s comments regarding the difficulty of debating theological issues are strengthened by a critical discussion of a debate in <em>Die Kerkblad</em> regarding the grammatical-historical method. His critical remarks regarding the value of a historical consciousness are discussed by way of a question on the relationship between a liberal theology and a conservative political point of view. Le Roux�s struggle with Snyman�s utilisation of apartheid as a rhetorical strategy leads the discussion to a recent example of overcoming racism while using unreflectingly racist imagery. This example indicates how theology effects cosmetic changes, without taking on the real issue. For this reason, the author concludes that a critical reading of the own Western tradition in Africa has become necessary.</p><p>�</p><p><em>--- Abstract translated into Sipedi</em> ---</p><p><strong>Go bala, go bona, go bolela le go dumela ka go fapana - go arabela go balwa ga 'Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees' ke babadi ba bangwe</strong></p><p>Bjale ka ge go fetleka Bibele go etwa pele ke ditumelo t�a go tiba t�a teologi, mongwadi wa <em>Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees</em> (2007) o arabela ditsholo t�a puku ye t�eo di tswet�wego ke seminare ye e fetilego - kudu ditshwayotshwayo t�a Hans van Deventer le Jurie le Roux. Sa pele, go ahlaahlwa dikgopolo t�e fetogilego ka Modimo. Poledi�ano ye e tlat�wa ke go ahlaahla tsholo ye e lebanywago le gore go bala Bibele go na le khuet�o ye itsego go batho ba bangwe, le gore go bala ka tsela ya go fapana go tlo tli�a kgopolo ya go fo�agala ka Modimo. Ditshwayotshwayo t�a Van Deventer mabapi le bothata bja go ngangi�ana ka ditaba t�a teologi di loi�wa ke go ahlaahla ka tsholo ka go <em>Die Kerkblad</em> poledi�ano mabapi le mokgwa wa go hlatholla Bibele ka go sekaseka popopolelo(gramatika) le histori ya tlholego ya yona. Ditshwayotshwayo t�a gagwe mabapi le mohola wa boitemogo bja go tli�wa ke histori di ahlaahlwa ka tsela ya pot�i�o tswalanong ya teologi ya tokologo le kgopolo ya sepoloiki ya go gana diphetogo. Bothata bja Le Roux mabapi le kgopolo ya Snyman ya go re kgethollo go ya ka merafe e �omi�wa e le tsela ya go t�hela phori mahlong e i�a poledi�ano ye go mohlala wo e sego wa kgale wa go fenya semorafe ka go �omi�a seswant�hokgopolo sa semorafe sa pepeneng. Mohlala wo o laet�a ka fao teologi e amago diphetogo t�a ka mehla maphelong a batho ntle le go lebanya ditaba t�a paale thwii. Ka lona lebaka leo, mongwadi o ruma ka go re go bala set�o sa batho ba Bodikela mo Afrika ka tshekatsheko le phetleko ya go tiba go tloga go nyakega.</p><p><em>--- End of translation ---</em></p>http://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/VE/article/view/303gesag van die BybelBybeluitleghistoriese bewussynGereformeerde teologieetiek van lees |
| spellingShingle | Gerrie Snyman Anders lees, sien, praat en glo � �n antwoord op ander se lees van �Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees� Verbum et Ecclesia gesag van die Bybel Bybeluitleg historiese bewussyn Gereformeerde teologie etiek van lees |
| title | Anders lees, sien, praat en glo � �n antwoord op ander se lees van �Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees� |
| title_full | Anders lees, sien, praat en glo � �n antwoord op ander se lees van �Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees� |
| title_fullStr | Anders lees, sien, praat en glo � �n antwoord op ander se lees van �Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees� |
| title_full_unstemmed | Anders lees, sien, praat en glo � �n antwoord op ander se lees van �Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees� |
| title_short | Anders lees, sien, praat en glo � �n antwoord op ander se lees van �Om die Bybel anders te lees: �n Etiek van Bybellees� |
| title_sort | anders lees sien praat en glo � �n antwoord op ander se lees van �om die bybel anders te lees �n etiek van bybellees� |
| topic | gesag van die Bybel Bybeluitleg historiese bewussyn Gereformeerde teologie etiek van lees |
| url | http://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/VE/article/view/303 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gerriesnyman andersleessienpraatenglonantwoordopanderseleesvanomdiebybelandersteleesnetiekvanbybellees |