Not to Indict and non Arraignment Solutions, Adopted by the Prosecutor
In this paper are shown not to indict solutions adopted by the prosecutor as set out in the NewCode of Criminal Procedure, which amended substantially old regulation. We intend to analyze the dismissal and thhe withdrawal of the criminal proceedings asdecisions adopted by the prosecutor according to...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ovidius University Press
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Ovidius University Annals: Economic Sciences Series |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://stec.univ-ovidius.ro/html/anale/ENG/2016/2016-II-full/s3/1.pdf |
| Summary: | In this paper are shown not to indict solutions adopted by the prosecutor as set out in the NewCode of Criminal Procedure, which amended substantially old regulation.
We intend to analyze the dismissal and thhe withdrawal of the criminal proceedings asdecisions adopted by the prosecutor according to art. 315-316 and 318 of the New Code ofCriminal Procedure.
According to the New Criminal Procedure Code, the termination of the criminal prosecutionrepresents the moment when all the investigating actions are fulfilled and the file is to beforwarded to the Prosecutor.
By using the expression “termination of the criminal prosecution” we understand that it is thedecision of the bodies in charge with it regarding the fulfillment of all procedures necessary for thecase solution, in order to forward the file to the Prosecutor. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2393-3127 2393-3127 |