Long-Term Outcome of Mechanical and Biological Prostheses in Patients with Left-Side Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. Long-term outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) who received either a mechanical (MP) or biological prosthesis (BP) are conflicting. A meta-analysis of observational studies comparing the long-term outcomes of left-side IE with the use of MP versus BP was performed. Metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesco Formica, Francesco Maestri, Florida Gripshi, Alan Gallingani, Silvia Grossi, Francesco Nicolini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/19/4356
_version_ 1797516218413875200
author Francesco Formica
Francesco Maestri
Florida Gripshi
Alan Gallingani
Silvia Grossi
Francesco Nicolini
author_facet Francesco Formica
Francesco Maestri
Florida Gripshi
Alan Gallingani
Silvia Grossi
Francesco Nicolini
author_sort Francesco Formica
collection DOAJ
description Background. Long-term outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) who received either a mechanical (MP) or biological prosthesis (BP) are conflicting. A meta-analysis of observational studies comparing the long-term outcomes of left-side IE with the use of MP versus BP was performed. Methods. Electronic databases from January 2000 to June 2021 were screened. Studies reporting long-term mortality were analyzed. The primary endpoint was long-term overall mortality. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital/.30-day mortality and freedom from both prosthesis reinfection and reintervention. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for survival according to the random effect model. Results. Thirteen retrospective observational studies reporting on 8645 patients (MP: 4688; BP: 4137) were included for comparison. Twelve studies reported data of long-term survival for a total of 8285 patients (MP: 4517; BP: 3768). The pooled analysis revealed that the use of MP was statistically associated with longer benefits compared to BP (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63–0.86; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The median follow-up time ranged from 1 to 15.3 years. The pooled analysis of five studies reporting data on prosthesis reinfection in 4491 patients (MP: 2433; BP: 2058) did not reveal significant differences (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.30–1.21; <i>p</i> = 0.15). Five studies reported data on prosthesis reintervention in 4401 patients (MP: 2307; BP: 2094). The meta-analysis revealed a significant difference in favor of MP (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.29–0.55; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Meta-regression reported no effect of male gender (<i>p</i> = 0.09) and age (<i>p</i> = 0.77) on long-term survival. Conclusions. In a meta-analysis of retrospective observational studies comparing the long-term outcome of patients who underwent surgery for left-sided IE, the use of MP compared to BP is associated with a significant longer-term survival and with a reduced incidence of late reoperation. The incidence of late reinfection is comparable between the two prostheses.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:58:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a0ad92d6cb064fce83862d7d91805060
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:58:10Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a0ad92d6cb064fce83862d7d918050602023-11-22T16:18:14ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-09-011019435610.3390/jcm10194356Long-Term Outcome of Mechanical and Biological Prostheses in Patients with Left-Side Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisFrancesco Formica0Francesco Maestri1Florida Gripshi2Alan Gallingani3Silvia Grossi4Francesco Nicolini5Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, ItalyCardiac Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, ItalyCardiac Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, ItalyCardiac Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, ItalyDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, 43126 Parma, ItalyDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, ItalyBackground. Long-term outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) who received either a mechanical (MP) or biological prosthesis (BP) are conflicting. A meta-analysis of observational studies comparing the long-term outcomes of left-side IE with the use of MP versus BP was performed. Methods. Electronic databases from January 2000 to June 2021 were screened. Studies reporting long-term mortality were analyzed. The primary endpoint was long-term overall mortality. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital/.30-day mortality and freedom from both prosthesis reinfection and reintervention. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for survival according to the random effect model. Results. Thirteen retrospective observational studies reporting on 8645 patients (MP: 4688; BP: 4137) were included for comparison. Twelve studies reported data of long-term survival for a total of 8285 patients (MP: 4517; BP: 3768). The pooled analysis revealed that the use of MP was statistically associated with longer benefits compared to BP (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63–0.86; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The median follow-up time ranged from 1 to 15.3 years. The pooled analysis of five studies reporting data on prosthesis reinfection in 4491 patients (MP: 2433; BP: 2058) did not reveal significant differences (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.30–1.21; <i>p</i> = 0.15). Five studies reported data on prosthesis reintervention in 4401 patients (MP: 2307; BP: 2094). The meta-analysis revealed a significant difference in favor of MP (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.29–0.55; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Meta-regression reported no effect of male gender (<i>p</i> = 0.09) and age (<i>p</i> = 0.77) on long-term survival. Conclusions. In a meta-analysis of retrospective observational studies comparing the long-term outcome of patients who underwent surgery for left-sided IE, the use of MP compared to BP is associated with a significant longer-term survival and with a reduced incidence of late reoperation. The incidence of late reinfection is comparable between the two prostheses.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/19/4356infective endocarditismechanical prosthesisbiological prosthesismeta-analysislong-term outcome
spellingShingle Francesco Formica
Francesco Maestri
Florida Gripshi
Alan Gallingani
Silvia Grossi
Francesco Nicolini
Long-Term Outcome of Mechanical and Biological Prostheses in Patients with Left-Side Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Journal of Clinical Medicine
infective endocarditis
mechanical prosthesis
biological prosthesis
meta-analysis
long-term outcome
title Long-Term Outcome of Mechanical and Biological Prostheses in Patients with Left-Side Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Long-Term Outcome of Mechanical and Biological Prostheses in Patients with Left-Side Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Long-Term Outcome of Mechanical and Biological Prostheses in Patients with Left-Side Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Outcome of Mechanical and Biological Prostheses in Patients with Left-Side Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Long-Term Outcome of Mechanical and Biological Prostheses in Patients with Left-Side Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort long term outcome of mechanical and biological prostheses in patients with left side infective endocarditis a systematic review and meta analysis
topic infective endocarditis
mechanical prosthesis
biological prosthesis
meta-analysis
long-term outcome
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/19/4356
work_keys_str_mv AT francescoformica longtermoutcomeofmechanicalandbiologicalprosthesesinpatientswithleftsideinfectiveendocarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT francescomaestri longtermoutcomeofmechanicalandbiologicalprosthesesinpatientswithleftsideinfectiveendocarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT floridagripshi longtermoutcomeofmechanicalandbiologicalprosthesesinpatientswithleftsideinfectiveendocarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alangallingani longtermoutcomeofmechanicalandbiologicalprosthesesinpatientswithleftsideinfectiveendocarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT silviagrossi longtermoutcomeofmechanicalandbiologicalprosthesesinpatientswithleftsideinfectiveendocarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT francesconicolini longtermoutcomeofmechanicalandbiologicalprosthesesinpatientswithleftsideinfectiveendocarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis