Reliability of a Wearable Motion Tracking System for the Clinical Evaluation of a Dynamic Cervical Spine Function

Neck pain is a common cause of disability worldwide. Lack of objective tools to quantify an individual’s functional disability results in the widespread use of subjective assessments to measure the limitations in spine function and the response to interventions. This study assessed the reliability o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamed Hani, Reid Souchereau, Anas Kachlan, Jonathan Dufour, Alexander Aurand, Prasath Mageswaran, Madison Hyer, William Marras
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/3/1448
_version_ 1797623213440630784
author Hamed Hani
Reid Souchereau
Anas Kachlan
Jonathan Dufour
Alexander Aurand
Prasath Mageswaran
Madison Hyer
William Marras
author_facet Hamed Hani
Reid Souchereau
Anas Kachlan
Jonathan Dufour
Alexander Aurand
Prasath Mageswaran
Madison Hyer
William Marras
author_sort Hamed Hani
collection DOAJ
description Neck pain is a common cause of disability worldwide. Lack of objective tools to quantify an individual’s functional disability results in the widespread use of subjective assessments to measure the limitations in spine function and the response to interventions. This study assessed the reliability of the quantifying neck function using a wearable cervical motion tracking system. Three novice raters recorded the neck motion assessments on 20 volunteers using the device. Kinematic features from the signals in all three anatomical planes were extracted and used as inputs to repeated measures and mixed-effects regression models to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Cervical spine-specific kinematic features indicated good and excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for the most part. For intra-rater reliability, the ICC values varied from 0.85 to 0.95, and for inter-rater reliability, they ranged from 0.7 to 0.89. Overall, velocity measures proved to be more reliable compared to other kinematic features. This technique is a trustworthy tool for evaluating neck function objectively. This study showed the potential for cervical spine-specific kinematic measurements to deliver repeatable and reliable metrics to evaluate clinical performance at any time points.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T09:25:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a0ba2c0a705c4fb7a41f7f890929529c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T09:25:29Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-a0ba2c0a705c4fb7a41f7f890929529c2023-11-16T18:01:13ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-01-01233144810.3390/s23031448Reliability of a Wearable Motion Tracking System for the Clinical Evaluation of a Dynamic Cervical Spine FunctionHamed Hani0Reid Souchereau1Anas Kachlan2Jonathan Dufour3Alexander Aurand4Prasath Mageswaran5Madison Hyer6William Marras7Spine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USASpine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USADepartment of Integrated Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USASpine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USASpine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USASpine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USACenter for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USASpine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USANeck pain is a common cause of disability worldwide. Lack of objective tools to quantify an individual’s functional disability results in the widespread use of subjective assessments to measure the limitations in spine function and the response to interventions. This study assessed the reliability of the quantifying neck function using a wearable cervical motion tracking system. Three novice raters recorded the neck motion assessments on 20 volunteers using the device. Kinematic features from the signals in all three anatomical planes were extracted and used as inputs to repeated measures and mixed-effects regression models to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Cervical spine-specific kinematic features indicated good and excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for the most part. For intra-rater reliability, the ICC values varied from 0.85 to 0.95, and for inter-rater reliability, they ranged from 0.7 to 0.89. Overall, velocity measures proved to be more reliable compared to other kinematic features. This technique is a trustworthy tool for evaluating neck function objectively. This study showed the potential for cervical spine-specific kinematic measurements to deliver repeatable and reliable metrics to evaluate clinical performance at any time points.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/3/1448musculoskeletal disorderneck functionreliabilityintra-raterinter-raterwearables
spellingShingle Hamed Hani
Reid Souchereau
Anas Kachlan
Jonathan Dufour
Alexander Aurand
Prasath Mageswaran
Madison Hyer
William Marras
Reliability of a Wearable Motion Tracking System for the Clinical Evaluation of a Dynamic Cervical Spine Function
Sensors
musculoskeletal disorder
neck function
reliability
intra-rater
inter-rater
wearables
title Reliability of a Wearable Motion Tracking System for the Clinical Evaluation of a Dynamic Cervical Spine Function
title_full Reliability of a Wearable Motion Tracking System for the Clinical Evaluation of a Dynamic Cervical Spine Function
title_fullStr Reliability of a Wearable Motion Tracking System for the Clinical Evaluation of a Dynamic Cervical Spine Function
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of a Wearable Motion Tracking System for the Clinical Evaluation of a Dynamic Cervical Spine Function
title_short Reliability of a Wearable Motion Tracking System for the Clinical Evaluation of a Dynamic Cervical Spine Function
title_sort reliability of a wearable motion tracking system for the clinical evaluation of a dynamic cervical spine function
topic musculoskeletal disorder
neck function
reliability
intra-rater
inter-rater
wearables
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/3/1448
work_keys_str_mv AT hamedhani reliabilityofawearablemotiontrackingsystemfortheclinicalevaluationofadynamiccervicalspinefunction
AT reidsouchereau reliabilityofawearablemotiontrackingsystemfortheclinicalevaluationofadynamiccervicalspinefunction
AT anaskachlan reliabilityofawearablemotiontrackingsystemfortheclinicalevaluationofadynamiccervicalspinefunction
AT jonathandufour reliabilityofawearablemotiontrackingsystemfortheclinicalevaluationofadynamiccervicalspinefunction
AT alexanderaurand reliabilityofawearablemotiontrackingsystemfortheclinicalevaluationofadynamiccervicalspinefunction
AT prasathmageswaran reliabilityofawearablemotiontrackingsystemfortheclinicalevaluationofadynamiccervicalspinefunction
AT madisonhyer reliabilityofawearablemotiontrackingsystemfortheclinicalevaluationofadynamiccervicalspinefunction
AT williammarras reliabilityofawearablemotiontrackingsystemfortheclinicalevaluationofadynamiccervicalspinefunction