How sick is Austria? – A decision support framework for different evaluations of the burden of disease within the Austrian population based on different data sources

ABSTRACT Objectives In healthcare it is crucial to have a fundamental knowledge of the burden of diseases within the population. Therefore we aimed to develop an Atlas of Epidemiology to gain better insight on the epidemiological situation. Based on primary and secondary health care data, we aime...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara Glock, Florian Endel, Gottfried Endel, Klaudia Sandholzer, Niki Popper, Christoph Rinner, Georg Duftschmid, Peter Filzmoser, Mehmet Can Mert, Jürgen Holl, Michael Wagner-Pinter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swansea University 2017-04-01
Series:International Journal of Population Data Science
Online Access:https://ijpds.org/article/view/111
_version_ 1797430892895928320
author Barbara Glock
Florian Endel
Gottfried Endel
Klaudia Sandholzer
Niki Popper
Christoph Rinner
Georg Duftschmid
Peter Filzmoser
Mehmet Can Mert
Jürgen Holl
Michael Wagner-Pinter
author_facet Barbara Glock
Florian Endel
Gottfried Endel
Klaudia Sandholzer
Niki Popper
Christoph Rinner
Georg Duftschmid
Peter Filzmoser
Mehmet Can Mert
Jürgen Holl
Michael Wagner-Pinter
author_sort Barbara Glock
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Objectives In healthcare it is crucial to have a fundamental knowledge of the burden of diseases within the population. Therefore we aimed to develop an Atlas of Epidemiology to gain better insight on the epidemiological situation. Based on primary and secondary health care data, we aimed to present results in interactive charts and maps, comprehensible to experts and the general public. The atlas builds a framework for rapid deployment of new data and results in a reproducible and efficient way. As a first use case three methods based on two different databases for the estimation of diabetes prevalence in Austria are compared. Approach Datasources: (i) reimbursement data 2006/2007 (GAP-DRG); (ii) national routine health survey (ATHIS) for 2006/2007. Methods for diabetes prevalence estimation: 1) ATC-ICD statistically relates pseudonymized data on medications to data on diagnoses from hospitalizations and sick leaves. 2) With the method Experts, medical experts assign specific medications to diabetes diagnoses. Patients with these medications are identified together with hospitalized diabetes diagnosed patients in GAP-DRG. 3) In ATHIS a sample of 15.000 persons was questioned if they a) ever had diabetes and b) were treated against diabetes in the last 12 months. Results are projected onto the Austrian population. Patients are divided by 10-year age-classes, gender and state. For the publicly online framework, implemented in html and javascript, pre-processed data in different granularity is required and used. Results Maps of Austria represent the prevalence of diabetes for each method and granularity level. The difference of the methods can be seen by clicking on the next map. For different age-classes (resp. different gender) the three methods can be compared directly within a bar chart. The technology for a rapid deployment of new data is now developed. For the use case first results have already been presented to decision makers, and feedback has been incorporated. Conclusion Besides depicting disease prevalence, the atlas of epidemiology also allows to visualize health care service data and results of simulation models in a fast and efficient way, which is important for decision makers. Soon the results of the ATC-ICD project on the prevalence of different diseases based on ICD9 diagnoses and medication data will be published in an aggregated form. This project is part of the K-Project dexhelpp in COMET – Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies that is funded by BMVIT, BMWGJ and transacted by FFG.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:35:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a0c0fdb696164889a1831c0a901a4ff3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2399-4908
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:35:03Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Swansea University
record_format Article
series International Journal of Population Data Science
spelling doaj.art-a0c0fdb696164889a1831c0a901a4ff32023-12-02T02:31:11ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082017-04-011110.23889/ijpds.v1i1.111111How sick is Austria? – A decision support framework for different evaluations of the burden of disease within the Austrian population based on different data sourcesBarbara Glock0Florian Endel1Gottfried Endel2Klaudia Sandholzer3Niki Popper4Christoph Rinner5Georg Duftschmid6Peter Filzmoser7Mehmet Can Mert8Jürgen Holl9Michael Wagner-Pinter10dwh Simulation Services, dwh GmbHInstitute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of TechnologyMain Association of Austrian Social Security InstitutionsMain Association of Austrian Social Security InstitutionsdexhelppCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of ViennaCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of ViennaInstitute of Statistics & Mathematical Methods in Economics, Vienna University of TechnologyInstitute of Statistics & Mathematical Methods in Economics, Vienna University of TechnologySynthesis ForschungSynthesis ForschungABSTRACT Objectives In healthcare it is crucial to have a fundamental knowledge of the burden of diseases within the population. Therefore we aimed to develop an Atlas of Epidemiology to gain better insight on the epidemiological situation. Based on primary and secondary health care data, we aimed to present results in interactive charts and maps, comprehensible to experts and the general public. The atlas builds a framework for rapid deployment of new data and results in a reproducible and efficient way. As a first use case three methods based on two different databases for the estimation of diabetes prevalence in Austria are compared. Approach Datasources: (i) reimbursement data 2006/2007 (GAP-DRG); (ii) national routine health survey (ATHIS) for 2006/2007. Methods for diabetes prevalence estimation: 1) ATC-ICD statistically relates pseudonymized data on medications to data on diagnoses from hospitalizations and sick leaves. 2) With the method Experts, medical experts assign specific medications to diabetes diagnoses. Patients with these medications are identified together with hospitalized diabetes diagnosed patients in GAP-DRG. 3) In ATHIS a sample of 15.000 persons was questioned if they a) ever had diabetes and b) were treated against diabetes in the last 12 months. Results are projected onto the Austrian population. Patients are divided by 10-year age-classes, gender and state. For the publicly online framework, implemented in html and javascript, pre-processed data in different granularity is required and used. Results Maps of Austria represent the prevalence of diabetes for each method and granularity level. The difference of the methods can be seen by clicking on the next map. For different age-classes (resp. different gender) the three methods can be compared directly within a bar chart. The technology for a rapid deployment of new data is now developed. For the use case first results have already been presented to decision makers, and feedback has been incorporated. Conclusion Besides depicting disease prevalence, the atlas of epidemiology also allows to visualize health care service data and results of simulation models in a fast and efficient way, which is important for decision makers. Soon the results of the ATC-ICD project on the prevalence of different diseases based on ICD9 diagnoses and medication data will be published in an aggregated form. This project is part of the K-Project dexhelpp in COMET – Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies that is funded by BMVIT, BMWGJ and transacted by FFG.https://ijpds.org/article/view/111
spellingShingle Barbara Glock
Florian Endel
Gottfried Endel
Klaudia Sandholzer
Niki Popper
Christoph Rinner
Georg Duftschmid
Peter Filzmoser
Mehmet Can Mert
Jürgen Holl
Michael Wagner-Pinter
How sick is Austria? – A decision support framework for different evaluations of the burden of disease within the Austrian population based on different data sources
International Journal of Population Data Science
title How sick is Austria? – A decision support framework for different evaluations of the burden of disease within the Austrian population based on different data sources
title_full How sick is Austria? – A decision support framework for different evaluations of the burden of disease within the Austrian population based on different data sources
title_fullStr How sick is Austria? – A decision support framework for different evaluations of the burden of disease within the Austrian population based on different data sources
title_full_unstemmed How sick is Austria? – A decision support framework for different evaluations of the burden of disease within the Austrian population based on different data sources
title_short How sick is Austria? – A decision support framework for different evaluations of the burden of disease within the Austrian population based on different data sources
title_sort how sick is austria a decision support framework for different evaluations of the burden of disease within the austrian population based on different data sources
url https://ijpds.org/article/view/111
work_keys_str_mv AT barbaraglock howsickisaustriaadecisionsupportframeworkfordifferentevaluationsoftheburdenofdiseasewithintheaustrianpopulationbasedondifferentdatasources
AT florianendel howsickisaustriaadecisionsupportframeworkfordifferentevaluationsoftheburdenofdiseasewithintheaustrianpopulationbasedondifferentdatasources
AT gottfriedendel howsickisaustriaadecisionsupportframeworkfordifferentevaluationsoftheburdenofdiseasewithintheaustrianpopulationbasedondifferentdatasources
AT klaudiasandholzer howsickisaustriaadecisionsupportframeworkfordifferentevaluationsoftheburdenofdiseasewithintheaustrianpopulationbasedondifferentdatasources
AT nikipopper howsickisaustriaadecisionsupportframeworkfordifferentevaluationsoftheburdenofdiseasewithintheaustrianpopulationbasedondifferentdatasources
AT christophrinner howsickisaustriaadecisionsupportframeworkfordifferentevaluationsoftheburdenofdiseasewithintheaustrianpopulationbasedondifferentdatasources
AT georgduftschmid howsickisaustriaadecisionsupportframeworkfordifferentevaluationsoftheburdenofdiseasewithintheaustrianpopulationbasedondifferentdatasources
AT peterfilzmoser howsickisaustriaadecisionsupportframeworkfordifferentevaluationsoftheburdenofdiseasewithintheaustrianpopulationbasedondifferentdatasources
AT mehmetcanmert howsickisaustriaadecisionsupportframeworkfordifferentevaluationsoftheburdenofdiseasewithintheaustrianpopulationbasedondifferentdatasources
AT jurgenholl howsickisaustriaadecisionsupportframeworkfordifferentevaluationsoftheburdenofdiseasewithintheaustrianpopulationbasedondifferentdatasources
AT michaelwagnerpinter howsickisaustriaadecisionsupportframeworkfordifferentevaluationsoftheburdenofdiseasewithintheaustrianpopulationbasedondifferentdatasources