EVALUATION OF GENETIC DIFFERENCES ON IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSE IN TWO NATIVE CHICKEN STRAINS FED ON DIFFERENT NATURAL AND ORGANIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION

The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the genetic differences in immunological response by use the natural growth promoters in diets offered to local chicken strains (GoldenMontazah (GM) and Bandra (B)). The present study was carried out in Seds Poultry Breeding Research...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eman S. Osman, E.A. Abdallah, A.G. Elsayed, A.H. Elattar
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: The Union of Arab Universities 2018-05-01
Series:Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ajs.journals.ekb.eg/article_31655_2540431d64f56fccd8629111a76efe59.pdf
_version_ 1797269751156703232
author Eman S. Osman
E.A. Abdallah
A.G. Elsayed
A.H. Elattar
author_facet Eman S. Osman
E.A. Abdallah
A.G. Elsayed
A.H. Elattar
author_sort Eman S. Osman
collection DOAJ
description The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the genetic differences in immunological response by use the natural growth promoters in diets offered to local chicken strains (GoldenMontazah (GM) and Bandra (B)). The present study was carried out in Seds Poultry Breeding Research Station, Animal Production Research Institute, Banysweif Governorate, through August to January (2016). A total of 240 chicks (120 hens of each strain) were used from 16 to 40 weeks of age. Birds were randomly distributed into six treatments. Each treatment had 20 (female) chicks (20X 6X 2) that were individually caged. The first treatment of each strain served as a control group and fed the formulated basal diet without any tested feed additives. The second treatment fed the basal diet with BioPlus® 2B, (400gm/ton) a commercial probiotic preparation (pro. (Bio)). The third treatment hens were fed the same basal diet with the addition of TechnoMos® (500gm/ton) a prebiotic type (pre. (Tech)).The fourth treatment fed the basal diet with Diamond V®(2.5kg/ton) a commercial prebiotic produced (pre. (Dia)). The fifth treatment fed the basal diet with FORMI® NDF (2kg/ton) (organic acid (FORMI)). The sixth treatment fed the basal diet with combination of (BioPlus® 2B, (400gm/ton) + TechnoMos® (500gm/ton) + FORMI® NDF (1kg/ton)) (combination (BTF)).  Data showed that, the Heterophils/Lymphocyte ratio percentage value was significantly higher in  Golden Montaza than Bandara. The highest value was found for organic acids (FORMI) group and the lowest value was found for probiotic (Bio Plus) group.  As for the antibody titer before vaccination the highest values were found for pre (Tech) group in comparison to pre (Dia) group. And there were no significant differences between the control group and all treated groups. Also, the higher values of antibody titer against Newcastle vaccine after vaccination were found in pre (Tech.), org ((FORMI), combination (Bio, Tech and FORMI) and control groups compare to values were found in pre (Dia) and pro (Bio) groups. As for the differences titer between before and after vaccination against Newcastle disease virus, there were no significant differences.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T01:53:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a0e1d5dd028a4487895add7a22c33ac8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-2675
2636-3585
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:53:21Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher The Union of Arab Universities
record_format Article
series Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences
spelling doaj.art-a0e1d5dd028a4487895add7a22c33ac82024-03-07T17:39:28ZaraThe Union of Arab UniversitiesArab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences1110-26752636-35852018-05-0126Special issue (2C)1859186710.21608/ajs.2018.3165531655EVALUATION OF GENETIC DIFFERENCES ON IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSE IN TWO NATIVE CHICKEN STRAINS FED ON DIFFERENT NATURAL AND ORGANIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATIONEman S. Osman0E.A. Abdallah1A.G. Elsayed2A.H. Elattar3Poultry Breeding Dept., Animal Production Research Institute, Agric., Research Center, Dokki, Giza, EgyptPoultry Breeding Dept., Animal Production Research Institute, Agric., Research Center, Dokki, Giza, EgyptPoultry Dept., Fac. of Agric., Ain Shams Univ., P.O. Box 68, Hadayek Shobra 11241, Cairo, EgyptPoultry Dept., Fac. of Agric., Ain Shams Univ., P.O. Box 68, Hadayek Shobra 11241, Cairo, EgyptThe main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the genetic differences in immunological response by use the natural growth promoters in diets offered to local chicken strains (GoldenMontazah (GM) and Bandra (B)). The present study was carried out in Seds Poultry Breeding Research Station, Animal Production Research Institute, Banysweif Governorate, through August to January (2016). A total of 240 chicks (120 hens of each strain) were used from 16 to 40 weeks of age. Birds were randomly distributed into six treatments. Each treatment had 20 (female) chicks (20X 6X 2) that were individually caged. The first treatment of each strain served as a control group and fed the formulated basal diet without any tested feed additives. The second treatment fed the basal diet with BioPlus® 2B, (400gm/ton) a commercial probiotic preparation (pro. (Bio)). The third treatment hens were fed the same basal diet with the addition of TechnoMos® (500gm/ton) a prebiotic type (pre. (Tech)).The fourth treatment fed the basal diet with Diamond V®(2.5kg/ton) a commercial prebiotic produced (pre. (Dia)). The fifth treatment fed the basal diet with FORMI® NDF (2kg/ton) (organic acid (FORMI)). The sixth treatment fed the basal diet with combination of (BioPlus® 2B, (400gm/ton) + TechnoMos® (500gm/ton) + FORMI® NDF (1kg/ton)) (combination (BTF)).  Data showed that, the Heterophils/Lymphocyte ratio percentage value was significantly higher in  Golden Montaza than Bandara. The highest value was found for organic acids (FORMI) group and the lowest value was found for probiotic (Bio Plus) group.  As for the antibody titer before vaccination the highest values were found for pre (Tech) group in comparison to pre (Dia) group. And there were no significant differences between the control group and all treated groups. Also, the higher values of antibody titer against Newcastle vaccine after vaccination were found in pre (Tech.), org ((FORMI), combination (Bio, Tech and FORMI) and control groups compare to values were found in pre (Dia) and pro (Bio) groups. As for the differences titer between before and after vaccination against Newcastle disease virus, there were no significant differences.https://ajs.journals.ekb.eg/article_31655_2540431d64f56fccd8629111a76efe59.pdfimmunological responseprobioticprebioticorganic acidlocal strains
spellingShingle Eman S. Osman
E.A. Abdallah
A.G. Elsayed
A.H. Elattar
EVALUATION OF GENETIC DIFFERENCES ON IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSE IN TWO NATIVE CHICKEN STRAINS FED ON DIFFERENT NATURAL AND ORGANIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION
Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences
immunological response
probiotic
prebiotic
organic acid
local strains
title EVALUATION OF GENETIC DIFFERENCES ON IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSE IN TWO NATIVE CHICKEN STRAINS FED ON DIFFERENT NATURAL AND ORGANIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION
title_full EVALUATION OF GENETIC DIFFERENCES ON IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSE IN TWO NATIVE CHICKEN STRAINS FED ON DIFFERENT NATURAL AND ORGANIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF GENETIC DIFFERENCES ON IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSE IN TWO NATIVE CHICKEN STRAINS FED ON DIFFERENT NATURAL AND ORGANIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF GENETIC DIFFERENCES ON IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSE IN TWO NATIVE CHICKEN STRAINS FED ON DIFFERENT NATURAL AND ORGANIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION
title_short EVALUATION OF GENETIC DIFFERENCES ON IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSE IN TWO NATIVE CHICKEN STRAINS FED ON DIFFERENT NATURAL AND ORGANIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION
title_sort evaluation of genetic differences on immunological response in two native chicken strains fed on different natural and organic acid supplementation
topic immunological response
probiotic
prebiotic
organic acid
local strains
url https://ajs.journals.ekb.eg/article_31655_2540431d64f56fccd8629111a76efe59.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT emansosman evaluationofgeneticdifferencesonimmunologicalresponseintwonativechickenstrainsfedondifferentnaturalandorganicacidsupplementation
AT eaabdallah evaluationofgeneticdifferencesonimmunologicalresponseintwonativechickenstrainsfedondifferentnaturalandorganicacidsupplementation
AT agelsayed evaluationofgeneticdifferencesonimmunologicalresponseintwonativechickenstrainsfedondifferentnaturalandorganicacidsupplementation
AT ahelattar evaluationofgeneticdifferencesonimmunologicalresponseintwonativechickenstrainsfedondifferentnaturalandorganicacidsupplementation