Finding common ground: agreement on increasing wildfire risk crosses political lines

Wildfire is a growing threat in the western US, driven by high fuel loads, a warming climate, and rising human activity in the wildland urban interface. Diverse stakeholders must collaborate to mitigate risk and adapt to changing conditions. Communication strategies in collaborative efforts may be m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joel Hartter, Lawrence C Hamilton, Mark J Ducey, Angela E Boag, Jonathan D Salerno, Nils D Christoffersen, Paul T Oester, Michael W Palace, Forrest R Stevens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7ace
_version_ 1797747542111289344
author Joel Hartter
Lawrence C Hamilton
Mark J Ducey
Angela E Boag
Jonathan D Salerno
Nils D Christoffersen
Paul T Oester
Michael W Palace
Forrest R Stevens
author_facet Joel Hartter
Lawrence C Hamilton
Mark J Ducey
Angela E Boag
Jonathan D Salerno
Nils D Christoffersen
Paul T Oester
Michael W Palace
Forrest R Stevens
author_sort Joel Hartter
collection DOAJ
description Wildfire is a growing threat in the western US, driven by high fuel loads, a warming climate, and rising human activity in the wildland urban interface. Diverse stakeholders must collaborate to mitigate risk and adapt to changing conditions. Communication strategies in collaborative efforts may be most effective if they align with local perspectives on wildfire and climate change. We investigate drivers of residents’ subjective perceptions regarding both issues in eastern Oregon using 2018 survey data, and examine objective evidence regarding local fuel loads, climate, and wildfire to identify trends and contextualize residents’ perceptions. We find that sociopolitical identity strongly predicts climate change beliefs, and that identity and climate beliefs predict both perceptions of recent past climate and likely future trends. Political influences on climate perceptions are strongest among people whose friends mostly belong to the same party. In contrast, perceptions about future wildfire risks are largely independent of climate-change beliefs, and of individual or peer-group politics. Most people accurately perceive the rising frequency of large wildfires, and expect this trend to continue. Decision makers have an opportunity to engage diverse stakeholders in developing policies to mitigate increasing wildfire risk without invoking climate change, which remains politically polarizing in some communities.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:53:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a0f9abbc45bb4d66898d04864e60f648
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:53:03Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-a0f9abbc45bb4d66898d04864e60f6482023-08-09T15:05:08ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262020-01-0115606500210.1088/1748-9326/ab7aceFinding common ground: agreement on increasing wildfire risk crosses political linesJoel Hartter0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2255-1845Lawrence C Hamilton1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-0649Mark J Ducey2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2027-1188Angela E Boag3Jonathan D Salerno4Nils D Christoffersen5Paul T Oester6Michael W Palace7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-2906Forrest R Stevens8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9328-3753Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado , Boulder, CO, United States of America; Carsey School of Public Policy, University of New Hampshire , Durham, NH, United States of AmericaCarsey School of Public Policy, University of New Hampshire , Durham, NH, United States of America; Department of Sociology, University of New Hampshire , Durham, NH, United States of AmericaCarsey School of Public Policy, University of New Hampshire , Durham, NH, United States of America; Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire , Durham, NH, United States of AmericaColorado Department of Natural Resources, Denver, CO, United States of AmericaWarner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO, United States of AmericaWallowa Resources , Enterprise, OR, United States of AmericaCollege of Forestry, Oregon State University , LaGrande, OR, United States of AmericaInstitute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire , Durham, NH, United States of AmericaDepartment of Geosciences, University of Louisville , Louisville, KY, United States of AmericaWildfire is a growing threat in the western US, driven by high fuel loads, a warming climate, and rising human activity in the wildland urban interface. Diverse stakeholders must collaborate to mitigate risk and adapt to changing conditions. Communication strategies in collaborative efforts may be most effective if they align with local perspectives on wildfire and climate change. We investigate drivers of residents’ subjective perceptions regarding both issues in eastern Oregon using 2018 survey data, and examine objective evidence regarding local fuel loads, climate, and wildfire to identify trends and contextualize residents’ perceptions. We find that sociopolitical identity strongly predicts climate change beliefs, and that identity and climate beliefs predict both perceptions of recent past climate and likely future trends. Political influences on climate perceptions are strongest among people whose friends mostly belong to the same party. In contrast, perceptions about future wildfire risks are largely independent of climate-change beliefs, and of individual or peer-group politics. Most people accurately perceive the rising frequency of large wildfires, and expect this trend to continue. Decision makers have an opportunity to engage diverse stakeholders in developing policies to mitigate increasing wildfire risk without invoking climate change, which remains politically polarizing in some communities.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7acewildfireforest managementclimate changedry forestsnortheast Oregon
spellingShingle Joel Hartter
Lawrence C Hamilton
Mark J Ducey
Angela E Boag
Jonathan D Salerno
Nils D Christoffersen
Paul T Oester
Michael W Palace
Forrest R Stevens
Finding common ground: agreement on increasing wildfire risk crosses political lines
Environmental Research Letters
wildfire
forest management
climate change
dry forests
northeast Oregon
title Finding common ground: agreement on increasing wildfire risk crosses political lines
title_full Finding common ground: agreement on increasing wildfire risk crosses political lines
title_fullStr Finding common ground: agreement on increasing wildfire risk crosses political lines
title_full_unstemmed Finding common ground: agreement on increasing wildfire risk crosses political lines
title_short Finding common ground: agreement on increasing wildfire risk crosses political lines
title_sort finding common ground agreement on increasing wildfire risk crosses political lines
topic wildfire
forest management
climate change
dry forests
northeast Oregon
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7ace
work_keys_str_mv AT joelhartter findingcommongroundagreementonincreasingwildfireriskcrossespoliticallines
AT lawrencechamilton findingcommongroundagreementonincreasingwildfireriskcrossespoliticallines
AT markjducey findingcommongroundagreementonincreasingwildfireriskcrossespoliticallines
AT angelaeboag findingcommongroundagreementonincreasingwildfireriskcrossespoliticallines
AT jonathandsalerno findingcommongroundagreementonincreasingwildfireriskcrossespoliticallines
AT nilsdchristoffersen findingcommongroundagreementonincreasingwildfireriskcrossespoliticallines
AT paultoester findingcommongroundagreementonincreasingwildfireriskcrossespoliticallines
AT michaelwpalace findingcommongroundagreementonincreasingwildfireriskcrossespoliticallines
AT forrestrstevens findingcommongroundagreementonincreasingwildfireriskcrossespoliticallines