CT-Quantified Adipose Tissue Distribution: Risk or Protective Factor for Complications after Rectal Cancer Surgery?

Purpose: Obesity is associated with increased incidence and mortality in rectal cancer (RC). However, an obesity paradox in the sense of a protective effect of obesity is discussed controversially. We evaluated whether adipose tissue distribution has an impact on medical (MC) and surgical complicati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johanna Nattenmüller, Jürgen Böhm, Astgik Bagdassarjan, Yakup Kulu, Biljana Gigic, Martin Schneider, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Alexis Ulrich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karger Publishers 2019-05-01
Series:Obesity Facts
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/499320
_version_ 1828843489716076544
author Johanna Nattenmüller
Jürgen Böhm
Astgik Bagdassarjan
Yakup Kulu
Biljana Gigic
Martin Schneider
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Cornelia M. Ulrich
Alexis Ulrich
author_facet Johanna Nattenmüller
Jürgen Böhm
Astgik Bagdassarjan
Yakup Kulu
Biljana Gigic
Martin Schneider
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Cornelia M. Ulrich
Alexis Ulrich
author_sort Johanna Nattenmüller
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Obesity is associated with increased incidence and mortality in rectal cancer (RC). However, an obesity paradox in the sense of a protective effect of obesity is discussed controversially. We evaluated whether adipose tissue distribution has an impact on medical (MC) and surgical complications (SC) after RC surgery. Methods: A total of 296 RC patients underwent oncological surgery and multidetector CT with quantification of total (TAT), visceral (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Logistic regressions on SC (anastomotic leakage [n = 26], wound infection [n = 58], bleeding [n = 12], abscess [n = 32], bladder dysfunction [n = 24], burst abdomen [n = 10]), and MC (pulmonary [n = 22], cardiac [n = 18], urinary tract infection [n = 9], sepsis [n = 5]) were performed. Results: High pelvicVAT was associated with reduced risk for overall SC (OR = 0.915, p = 0.012) and anastomotic leakage (OR = 0.587, p = 0.024, CI: 0.369/0.934). In contrast, CT-quantified obesity was associated with increased risk for wound infection, bladder dysfunction, burst abdomen, overall MC, and cardiac complications (ORs up to 1.423). BMI was not associated with any SC or MC. Conclusion: An obesity paradox with a protective effect of CT-quantified adipose tissue was confirmed for anastomotic leakage and overall SC. In contrast, high adipose tissue was associated with higher risk for other SC and MC. These results show a more complex influence of body composition on MC and SC. CT-quantified obesity is able to provide deeper insights to explain the obesity paradox beyond BMI.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T20:46:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a112bca936ef4e31a18068bc2146f3b5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-4025
1662-4033
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T20:46:14Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Karger Publishers
record_format Article
series Obesity Facts
spelling doaj.art-a112bca936ef4e31a18068bc2146f3b52022-12-22T00:12:34ZengKarger PublishersObesity Facts1662-40251662-40332019-05-0112325927110.1159/000499320499320CT-Quantified Adipose Tissue Distribution: Risk or Protective Factor for Complications after Rectal Cancer Surgery?Johanna NattenmüllerJürgen BöhmAstgik BagdassarjanYakup KuluBiljana GigicMartin SchneiderHans-Ulrich KauczorCornelia M. UlrichAlexis UlrichPurpose: Obesity is associated with increased incidence and mortality in rectal cancer (RC). However, an obesity paradox in the sense of a protective effect of obesity is discussed controversially. We evaluated whether adipose tissue distribution has an impact on medical (MC) and surgical complications (SC) after RC surgery. Methods: A total of 296 RC patients underwent oncological surgery and multidetector CT with quantification of total (TAT), visceral (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Logistic regressions on SC (anastomotic leakage [n = 26], wound infection [n = 58], bleeding [n = 12], abscess [n = 32], bladder dysfunction [n = 24], burst abdomen [n = 10]), and MC (pulmonary [n = 22], cardiac [n = 18], urinary tract infection [n = 9], sepsis [n = 5]) were performed. Results: High pelvicVAT was associated with reduced risk for overall SC (OR = 0.915, p = 0.012) and anastomotic leakage (OR = 0.587, p = 0.024, CI: 0.369/0.934). In contrast, CT-quantified obesity was associated with increased risk for wound infection, bladder dysfunction, burst abdomen, overall MC, and cardiac complications (ORs up to 1.423). BMI was not associated with any SC or MC. Conclusion: An obesity paradox with a protective effect of CT-quantified adipose tissue was confirmed for anastomotic leakage and overall SC. In contrast, high adipose tissue was associated with higher risk for other SC and MC. These results show a more complex influence of body composition on MC and SC. CT-quantified obesity is able to provide deeper insights to explain the obesity paradox beyond BMI.https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/499320Rectal neoplasmsMorbidityBody compositionAdipose tissueObesity paradoxComputed tomography
spellingShingle Johanna Nattenmüller
Jürgen Böhm
Astgik Bagdassarjan
Yakup Kulu
Biljana Gigic
Martin Schneider
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Cornelia M. Ulrich
Alexis Ulrich
CT-Quantified Adipose Tissue Distribution: Risk or Protective Factor for Complications after Rectal Cancer Surgery?
Obesity Facts
Rectal neoplasms
Morbidity
Body composition
Adipose tissue
Obesity paradox
Computed tomography
title CT-Quantified Adipose Tissue Distribution: Risk or Protective Factor for Complications after Rectal Cancer Surgery?
title_full CT-Quantified Adipose Tissue Distribution: Risk or Protective Factor for Complications after Rectal Cancer Surgery?
title_fullStr CT-Quantified Adipose Tissue Distribution: Risk or Protective Factor for Complications after Rectal Cancer Surgery?
title_full_unstemmed CT-Quantified Adipose Tissue Distribution: Risk or Protective Factor for Complications after Rectal Cancer Surgery?
title_short CT-Quantified Adipose Tissue Distribution: Risk or Protective Factor for Complications after Rectal Cancer Surgery?
title_sort ct quantified adipose tissue distribution risk or protective factor for complications after rectal cancer surgery
topic Rectal neoplasms
Morbidity
Body composition
Adipose tissue
Obesity paradox
Computed tomography
url https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/499320
work_keys_str_mv AT johannanattenmuller ctquantifiedadiposetissuedistributionriskorprotectivefactorforcomplicationsafterrectalcancersurgery
AT jurgenbohm ctquantifiedadiposetissuedistributionriskorprotectivefactorforcomplicationsafterrectalcancersurgery
AT astgikbagdassarjan ctquantifiedadiposetissuedistributionriskorprotectivefactorforcomplicationsafterrectalcancersurgery
AT yakupkulu ctquantifiedadiposetissuedistributionriskorprotectivefactorforcomplicationsafterrectalcancersurgery
AT biljanagigic ctquantifiedadiposetissuedistributionriskorprotectivefactorforcomplicationsafterrectalcancersurgery
AT martinschneider ctquantifiedadiposetissuedistributionriskorprotectivefactorforcomplicationsafterrectalcancersurgery
AT hansulrichkauczor ctquantifiedadiposetissuedistributionriskorprotectivefactorforcomplicationsafterrectalcancersurgery
AT corneliamulrich ctquantifiedadiposetissuedistributionriskorprotectivefactorforcomplicationsafterrectalcancersurgery
AT alexisulrich ctquantifiedadiposetissuedistributionriskorprotectivefactorforcomplicationsafterrectalcancersurgery