Bayesian estimation of diagnostic accuracy of fecal culture and PCR-based tests for the detection of Salmonella enterica in California cull dairy cattle

Epidemiological studies of low prevalence disease problems are often hindered by the high cost of diagnostic testing. The objective of this study was to evaluate PCR screening of both individual and pooled fecal samples from culled dairy cows for the invA gene of Salmonella followed by culture to de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John M. Adaska, Pius S. Ekong, Kristin A. Clothier, Deniece R. Williams, Paul V. Rossitto, Terry W. Lehenbauer, Edward R. Atwill, Xunde Li, Sharif S. Aly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2020-01-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/8310.pdf
_version_ 1827612119806246912
author John M. Adaska
Pius S. Ekong
Kristin A. Clothier
Deniece R. Williams
Paul V. Rossitto
Terry W. Lehenbauer
Edward R. Atwill
Xunde Li
Sharif S. Aly
author_facet John M. Adaska
Pius S. Ekong
Kristin A. Clothier
Deniece R. Williams
Paul V. Rossitto
Terry W. Lehenbauer
Edward R. Atwill
Xunde Li
Sharif S. Aly
author_sort John M. Adaska
collection DOAJ
description Epidemiological studies of low prevalence disease problems are often hindered by the high cost of diagnostic testing. The objective of this study was to evaluate PCR screening of both individual and pooled fecal samples from culled dairy cows for the invA gene of Salmonella followed by culture to determine if the sensitivity and specificity were comparable to the results from traditional culture methods applied to individual samples. Cows from six different dairies were sampled in all four seasons. A total of 240 individual cow fecal samples, 24 fecal pools and 24 pools of 24-hour tetrathionate enrichment broth were tested. Diagnostic sensitivity of PCR screening followed by culture of PCR positive or indeterminate samples (i.e PCR-CUL method) was lower than that of culture (CUL) when applied to individual fecal samples (94.8%, 99.5%), however the specificity was comparable (99.6% and 97.7% respectively). For pools of five fecal samples and pools of five, 24 h tetrathionate broth samples, the specificity of both tests were comparable (∼98%); however, their sensitivity was only comparable in pooled fecal samples (∼93%) but greater for culture compared to PCR-CUL in pooled broth samples (∼99% versus ∼93%). Compared to culture results from testing of individual fecal samples, testing pooled fecal samples by culture had a relative sensitivity of 74% and relative specificity of 96%, testing pooled fecal samples by PCR-CUL resulted in relative sensitivity of 90% and relative specificity of 96%. Testing of pooled 24-hour enrichment broth by PCR-CUL increased the relative sensitivity and specificity to 100%. PCR testing followed by culture of positive or indeterminate samples is a time saving alternative to traditional methods. In addition, pooling of samples may be a useful method for decreasing cost if study aims can accommodate a moderate loss of relative sensitivity.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:16:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a12a2671f60b4823ad39b52d2a32de55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:16:52Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-a12a2671f60b4823ad39b52d2a32de552023-12-02T22:01:38ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592020-01-018e831010.7717/peerj.8310Bayesian estimation of diagnostic accuracy of fecal culture and PCR-based tests for the detection of Salmonella enterica in California cull dairy cattleJohn M. Adaska0Pius S. Ekong1Kristin A. Clothier2Deniece R. Williams3Paul V. Rossitto4Terry W. Lehenbauer5Edward R. Atwill6Xunde Li7Sharif S. Aly8School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory System, Tulare, CA, United States of AmericaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA, United States of AmericaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory System, Tulare, CA, United States of AmericaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA, United States of AmericaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA, United States of AmericaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA, United States of AmericaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Western Institute for Food Safety and Security, Davis, CA, United States of AmericaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Western Institute for Food Safety and Security, Davis, CA, United States of AmericaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA, United States of AmericaEpidemiological studies of low prevalence disease problems are often hindered by the high cost of diagnostic testing. The objective of this study was to evaluate PCR screening of both individual and pooled fecal samples from culled dairy cows for the invA gene of Salmonella followed by culture to determine if the sensitivity and specificity were comparable to the results from traditional culture methods applied to individual samples. Cows from six different dairies were sampled in all four seasons. A total of 240 individual cow fecal samples, 24 fecal pools and 24 pools of 24-hour tetrathionate enrichment broth were tested. Diagnostic sensitivity of PCR screening followed by culture of PCR positive or indeterminate samples (i.e PCR-CUL method) was lower than that of culture (CUL) when applied to individual fecal samples (94.8%, 99.5%), however the specificity was comparable (99.6% and 97.7% respectively). For pools of five fecal samples and pools of five, 24 h tetrathionate broth samples, the specificity of both tests were comparable (∼98%); however, their sensitivity was only comparable in pooled fecal samples (∼93%) but greater for culture compared to PCR-CUL in pooled broth samples (∼99% versus ∼93%). Compared to culture results from testing of individual fecal samples, testing pooled fecal samples by culture had a relative sensitivity of 74% and relative specificity of 96%, testing pooled fecal samples by PCR-CUL resulted in relative sensitivity of 90% and relative specificity of 96%. Testing of pooled 24-hour enrichment broth by PCR-CUL increased the relative sensitivity and specificity to 100%. PCR testing followed by culture of positive or indeterminate samples is a time saving alternative to traditional methods. In addition, pooling of samples may be a useful method for decreasing cost if study aims can accommodate a moderate loss of relative sensitivity.https://peerj.com/articles/8310.pdfBayesianDiagnostic accuracySensitivitySpecificitySalmonellaDairy cow
spellingShingle John M. Adaska
Pius S. Ekong
Kristin A. Clothier
Deniece R. Williams
Paul V. Rossitto
Terry W. Lehenbauer
Edward R. Atwill
Xunde Li
Sharif S. Aly
Bayesian estimation of diagnostic accuracy of fecal culture and PCR-based tests for the detection of Salmonella enterica in California cull dairy cattle
PeerJ
Bayesian
Diagnostic accuracy
Sensitivity
Specificity
Salmonella
Dairy cow
title Bayesian estimation of diagnostic accuracy of fecal culture and PCR-based tests for the detection of Salmonella enterica in California cull dairy cattle
title_full Bayesian estimation of diagnostic accuracy of fecal culture and PCR-based tests for the detection of Salmonella enterica in California cull dairy cattle
title_fullStr Bayesian estimation of diagnostic accuracy of fecal culture and PCR-based tests for the detection of Salmonella enterica in California cull dairy cattle
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian estimation of diagnostic accuracy of fecal culture and PCR-based tests for the detection of Salmonella enterica in California cull dairy cattle
title_short Bayesian estimation of diagnostic accuracy of fecal culture and PCR-based tests for the detection of Salmonella enterica in California cull dairy cattle
title_sort bayesian estimation of diagnostic accuracy of fecal culture and pcr based tests for the detection of salmonella enterica in california cull dairy cattle
topic Bayesian
Diagnostic accuracy
Sensitivity
Specificity
Salmonella
Dairy cow
url https://peerj.com/articles/8310.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT johnmadaska bayesianestimationofdiagnosticaccuracyoffecalcultureandpcrbasedtestsforthedetectionofsalmonellaentericaincaliforniaculldairycattle
AT piussekong bayesianestimationofdiagnosticaccuracyoffecalcultureandpcrbasedtestsforthedetectionofsalmonellaentericaincaliforniaculldairycattle
AT kristinaclothier bayesianestimationofdiagnosticaccuracyoffecalcultureandpcrbasedtestsforthedetectionofsalmonellaentericaincaliforniaculldairycattle
AT deniecerwilliams bayesianestimationofdiagnosticaccuracyoffecalcultureandpcrbasedtestsforthedetectionofsalmonellaentericaincaliforniaculldairycattle
AT paulvrossitto bayesianestimationofdiagnosticaccuracyoffecalcultureandpcrbasedtestsforthedetectionofsalmonellaentericaincaliforniaculldairycattle
AT terrywlehenbauer bayesianestimationofdiagnosticaccuracyoffecalcultureandpcrbasedtestsforthedetectionofsalmonellaentericaincaliforniaculldairycattle
AT edwardratwill bayesianestimationofdiagnosticaccuracyoffecalcultureandpcrbasedtestsforthedetectionofsalmonellaentericaincaliforniaculldairycattle
AT xundeli bayesianestimationofdiagnosticaccuracyoffecalcultureandpcrbasedtestsforthedetectionofsalmonellaentericaincaliforniaculldairycattle
AT sharifsaly bayesianestimationofdiagnosticaccuracyoffecalcultureandpcrbasedtestsforthedetectionofsalmonellaentericaincaliforniaculldairycattle