Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials

Aim: To assess the chemical composition and oral biofilm formation on different types of commercially available clear orthodontic retainer materials (CORM). Materials and Methods: Four types of CORM commercially available were used (Clear advantage series I (CAS1), Clear advantage series II (CAS2),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suhad M Hamdoon, Saeed AlSamak, Mahmood Kh Ahmed, Saad Gasgoos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Orthodontic Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jorthodsci.org/article.asp?issn=2278-0203;year=2022;volume=11;issue=1;spage=34;epage=34;aulast=Hamdoon
_version_ 1797998797668745216
author Suhad M Hamdoon
Saeed AlSamak
Mahmood Kh Ahmed
Saad Gasgoos
author_facet Suhad M Hamdoon
Saeed AlSamak
Mahmood Kh Ahmed
Saad Gasgoos
author_sort Suhad M Hamdoon
collection DOAJ
description Aim: To assess the chemical composition and oral biofilm formation on different types of commercially available clear orthodontic retainer materials (CORM). Materials and Methods: Four types of CORM commercially available were used (Clear advantage series I (CAS1), Clear advantage series II (CAS2), Endure (ES), and CENTRI FORM-clear rigid material (CFCRM)). Circular samples (12 mm diameter) of each CORM were prepared for (n = 40). Unstimulated saliva from twenty volunteers was collected. Fourier Transformation Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) was used for the evaluation of the chemical composition of CORM. For the quantitative assessment of oral biofilm formation, samples of each CORM were incubated for twenty-four hours, and crystal violet assay (CVA) was utilized. The degree of absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at 570 nm. For qualitative evaluation of oral formation, the samples of each CORM were incubated for 24 hours, and viable biofilm cells stained by acridine orange were examined under a fluorescent microscope. Results: FTIR findings showed that CAS2 was made of polypropylene and ES is made of polyvinyl chloride, while others were made of co-polyester. CVA results confirmed that CAS2 showed the lowest biofilm formation, which differs significantly compared to CAS1, CFCRM, and ES. No significant difference in biofilm formation was detected between CAS1, CFCRM, and ES. Viable biofilm cells staining by acridine orange showed that CAS2 demonstrated smaller microcolonies of viable biofilm cells compared with CAS1, CFCRM, and ES, which confirmed the result obtained by CVA. Conclusions: CAS2 showed anti-microbial activities with a decrease the in vitro biofilm formation, which may be related to its chemical composition.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T10:54:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a130c9bf06e343aa8d121d2247df4ee4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2278-0203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T10:54:25Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthodontic Science
spelling doaj.art-a130c9bf06e343aa8d121d2247df4ee42022-12-22T04:28:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Orthodontic Science2278-02032022-01-01111343410.4103/jos.jos_7_22Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materialsSuhad M HamdoonSaeed AlSamakMahmood Kh AhmedSaad GasgoosAim: To assess the chemical composition and oral biofilm formation on different types of commercially available clear orthodontic retainer materials (CORM). Materials and Methods: Four types of CORM commercially available were used (Clear advantage series I (CAS1), Clear advantage series II (CAS2), Endure (ES), and CENTRI FORM-clear rigid material (CFCRM)). Circular samples (12 mm diameter) of each CORM were prepared for (n = 40). Unstimulated saliva from twenty volunteers was collected. Fourier Transformation Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) was used for the evaluation of the chemical composition of CORM. For the quantitative assessment of oral biofilm formation, samples of each CORM were incubated for twenty-four hours, and crystal violet assay (CVA) was utilized. The degree of absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at 570 nm. For qualitative evaluation of oral formation, the samples of each CORM were incubated for 24 hours, and viable biofilm cells stained by acridine orange were examined under a fluorescent microscope. Results: FTIR findings showed that CAS2 was made of polypropylene and ES is made of polyvinyl chloride, while others were made of co-polyester. CVA results confirmed that CAS2 showed the lowest biofilm formation, which differs significantly compared to CAS1, CFCRM, and ES. No significant difference in biofilm formation was detected between CAS1, CFCRM, and ES. Viable biofilm cells staining by acridine orange showed that CAS2 demonstrated smaller microcolonies of viable biofilm cells compared with CAS1, CFCRM, and ES, which confirmed the result obtained by CVA. Conclusions: CAS2 showed anti-microbial activities with a decrease the in vitro biofilm formation, which may be related to its chemical composition.http://www.jorthodsci.org/article.asp?issn=2278-0203;year=2022;volume=11;issue=1;spage=34;epage=34;aulast=Hamdoonacridine orangeclear orthodontic retainer materialsessexoral biofilm
spellingShingle Suhad M Hamdoon
Saeed AlSamak
Mahmood Kh Ahmed
Saad Gasgoos
Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials
Journal of Orthodontic Science
acridine orange
clear orthodontic retainer materials
essex
oral biofilm
title Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials
title_full Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials
title_fullStr Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials
title_short Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials
title_sort evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials
topic acridine orange
clear orthodontic retainer materials
essex
oral biofilm
url http://www.jorthodsci.org/article.asp?issn=2278-0203;year=2022;volume=11;issue=1;spage=34;epage=34;aulast=Hamdoon
work_keys_str_mv AT suhadmhamdoon evaluationofbiofilmformationondifferentclearorthodonticretainermaterials
AT saeedalsamak evaluationofbiofilmformationondifferentclearorthodonticretainermaterials
AT mahmoodkhahmed evaluationofbiofilmformationondifferentclearorthodonticretainermaterials
AT saadgasgoos evaluationofbiofilmformationondifferentclearorthodonticretainermaterials