Radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots
Abstract Background To assess and compare the radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots (TR) and autogenous bone (AB) blocks. Methods In a total of 30 patients, lateral ridge augmentation was conducted in parallel groups using either (1) healthy...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Implant Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40729-018-0142-6 |
_version_ | 1818023900052717568 |
---|---|
author | Puria Parvini Robert Sader Didem Sahin Jürgen Becker Frank Schwarz |
author_facet | Puria Parvini Robert Sader Didem Sahin Jürgen Becker Frank Schwarz |
author_sort | Puria Parvini |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background To assess and compare the radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots (TR) and autogenous bone (AB) blocks. Methods In a total of 30 patients, lateral ridge augmentation was conducted in parallel groups using either (1) healthy autogenous tooth roots (e.g., retained wisdom or impacted teeth) (n = 15) or (2) cortical autogenous bone blocks harvested from the retromolar area. Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans taken at 26 weeks of submerged healing were analyzed for the basal graft integration (i.e., contact between the graft and the host bone in %) (BI26) and the cross-sectional grafted area (mm2) (SA26). Results Both groups revealed a comparable clinical width of the alveolar ridge at baseline (CWb). Mean BI26 and SA26 values amounted to 69.26 ± 26.01% (median 72.44) and 22.07 ± 12.98 mm2 (median 18.83) in the TR group and 79.67 ± 15.66% (median 78.85) and 12.42 ± 10.11 mm2 (median 11.36) in the AB group, respectively. Between-group differences in mean SA26 values were statistically significant (p = 0.031). Linear regression analysis failed to reveal any significant correlations between BI26 and CWb/SA26 values in either group. Conclusions TR grafts may be associated with improved SA26 values following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation. Trial registration DRKS00009586. Registered 10 February 2016. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T03:51:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a131b79bdd5a4997bb2593d9a805dcfb |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2198-4034 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T03:51:40Z |
publishDate | 2018-09-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Implant Dentistry |
spelling | doaj.art-a131b79bdd5a4997bb2593d9a805dcfb2022-12-22T02:03:14ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Implant Dentistry2198-40342018-09-01411610.1186/s40729-018-0142-6Radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth rootsPuria Parvini0Robert Sader1Didem Sahin2Jürgen Becker3Frank Schwarz4Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversityDepartment for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University FrankfurtDepartment of Oral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum DüsseldorfDepartment of Oral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum DüsseldorfDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversityAbstract Background To assess and compare the radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots (TR) and autogenous bone (AB) blocks. Methods In a total of 30 patients, lateral ridge augmentation was conducted in parallel groups using either (1) healthy autogenous tooth roots (e.g., retained wisdom or impacted teeth) (n = 15) or (2) cortical autogenous bone blocks harvested from the retromolar area. Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans taken at 26 weeks of submerged healing were analyzed for the basal graft integration (i.e., contact between the graft and the host bone in %) (BI26) and the cross-sectional grafted area (mm2) (SA26). Results Both groups revealed a comparable clinical width of the alveolar ridge at baseline (CWb). Mean BI26 and SA26 values amounted to 69.26 ± 26.01% (median 72.44) and 22.07 ± 12.98 mm2 (median 18.83) in the TR group and 79.67 ± 15.66% (median 78.85) and 12.42 ± 10.11 mm2 (median 11.36) in the AB group, respectively. Between-group differences in mean SA26 values were statistically significant (p = 0.031). Linear regression analysis failed to reveal any significant correlations between BI26 and CWb/SA26 values in either group. Conclusions TR grafts may be associated with improved SA26 values following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation. Trial registration DRKS00009586. Registered 10 February 2016.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40729-018-0142-6Clinical studyAlveolar ridge augmentationTooth transplantation |
spellingShingle | Puria Parvini Robert Sader Didem Sahin Jürgen Becker Frank Schwarz Radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots International Journal of Implant Dentistry Clinical study Alveolar ridge augmentation Tooth transplantation |
title | Radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots |
title_full | Radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots |
title_fullStr | Radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots |
title_short | Radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots |
title_sort | radiographic outcomes following lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots |
topic | Clinical study Alveolar ridge augmentation Tooth transplantation |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40729-018-0142-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puriaparvini radiographicoutcomesfollowinglateralalveolarridgeaugmentationusingautogenoustoothroots AT robertsader radiographicoutcomesfollowinglateralalveolarridgeaugmentationusingautogenoustoothroots AT didemsahin radiographicoutcomesfollowinglateralalveolarridgeaugmentationusingautogenoustoothroots AT jurgenbecker radiographicoutcomesfollowinglateralalveolarridgeaugmentationusingautogenoustoothroots AT frankschwarz radiographicoutcomesfollowinglateralalveolarridgeaugmentationusingautogenoustoothroots |