Reply to the Comments on Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights
This article sets out to reply to the comments by Antony Duff, Sabine Gless, John Jackson and Thomas Weigend on my article «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial». It begins by examining the various positions of the commentators to the question of the aim(s) of the criminal trial before going o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Marcial Pons
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Quaestio Facti |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22992 |
| _version_ | 1827367732379648000 |
|---|---|
| author | Sarah Jane Summers |
| author_facet | Sarah Jane Summers |
| author_sort | Sarah Jane Summers |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This article sets out to reply to the comments by Antony Duff, Sabine Gless, John Jackson and Thomas Weigend on my article «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial». It begins by examining the various positions of the commentators to the question of the aim(s) of the criminal trial before going on to consider the limits of instrumentalist and proceduralist approaches and to re-examine the right-based conception of trials. It concludes by considering the implications of this account of criminal trials.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T09:16:23Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a165164d1bb7479d8ee1b3c9f4d237d5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2660-4515 2604-6202 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T09:16:23Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Marcial Pons |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Quaestio Facti |
| spelling | doaj.art-a165164d1bb7479d8ee1b3c9f4d237d52024-01-31T15:04:17ZengMarcial PonsQuaestio Facti2660-45152604-62022024-01-01610.33115/udg_bib/qf.i6.22992Reply to the Comments on Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights Sarah Jane Summers0University of Zurich This article sets out to reply to the comments by Antony Duff, Sabine Gless, John Jackson and Thomas Weigend on my article «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial». It begins by examining the various positions of the commentators to the question of the aim(s) of the criminal trial before going on to consider the limits of instrumentalist and proceduralist approaches and to re-examine the right-based conception of trials. It concludes by considering the implications of this account of criminal trials. https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22992Criminal ProceedingsCriminal EvidenceHuman RightsTruth |
| spellingShingle | Sarah Jane Summers Reply to the Comments on Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights Quaestio Facti Criminal Proceedings Criminal Evidence Human Rights Truth |
| title | Reply to the Comments on Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights |
| title_full | Reply to the Comments on Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights |
| title_fullStr | Reply to the Comments on Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reply to the Comments on Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights |
| title_short | Reply to the Comments on Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights |
| title_sort | reply to the comments on epistemic ambitions of the criminal trial truth proof and rights |
| topic | Criminal Proceedings Criminal Evidence Human Rights Truth |
| url | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22992 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sarahjanesummers replytothecommentsonepistemicambitionsofthecriminaltrialtruthproofandrights |