Reply to the Comments on Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights
This article sets out to reply to the comments by Antony Duff, Sabine Gless, John Jackson and Thomas Weigend on my article «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial». It begins by examining the various positions of the commentators to the question of the aim(s) of the criminal trial before going o...
Main Author: | Sarah Jane Summers |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Marcial Pons
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Quaestio Facti |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22992 |
Similar Items
-
The Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof, and Rights
by: Sarah Jane Summers
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Truth, Proof, Rights and the Rule of Law in Criminal Adjudication
by: John Dugald Jackson
Published: (2023-04-01) -
Objective Truth and Contentiousness in Criminal Procedure: Confrontation and Mutual Addition
by: Ryabkov E. M.
Published: (2014-04-01) -
The Right to Legal Assistance in Criminal Proceedings
by: Oskars Kulmanis
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Could Robot Judges Believe? Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial as we approach the Digital Age
by: Sabine Gless
Published: (2023-03-01)