Microscopic evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with different hand and nickel-titanium files; An In Vitro study
Background: Effective endodontic instrumentation aims to remove microorganisms, debris, and tissue from the root canal while maintaining dentinal integrity. This study compares dentinal defect incidence following canal preparation with different hand files, nickel-titanium rotary files, and reciproc...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=711;epage=713;aulast=Karia |
| _version_ | 1797222253891420160 |
|---|---|
| author | Hiral Milap Karia Ishita Vaghela Archan Dhanesha Mrugnayani Pranav Solanki Rangesing Rathwa |
| author_facet | Hiral Milap Karia Ishita Vaghela Archan Dhanesha Mrugnayani Pranav Solanki Rangesing Rathwa |
| author_sort | Hiral Milap Karia |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Effective endodontic instrumentation aims to remove microorganisms, debris, and tissue from the root canal while maintaining dentinal integrity. This study compares dentinal defect incidence following canal preparation with different hand files, nickel-titanium rotary files, and reciprocating files. Materials and Methods: Eighty single-rooted mandibular premolars with mature apices were collected. Four groups (n = 20) were established based on canal patency establishment, canal preparation technique, irrigation solution, and final irrigation. After root sectioning at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm from the apex, slices were examined under a stereomicroscope, and dentinal defects were recorded. A second examiner reviewed the images. Results: The results showed significant difference of P = 0.031 among Hand files vs. Rotary ProTaper files: In Hand files vs. Reciprocating WaveOne files significant difference was P = 0.048, and for rotary ProTaper files vs. Reciprocating WaveOne files: No significant difference (P = 0.643). Dentinal defect counts were similar at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Statistically significant variation was observed between hand files and rotary files, as well as hand files and reciprocating files. Conclusion: Both rotary and reciprocating files showed a statistically significant increase in dentinal defect incidence compared to hand files. However, clinical implications should be considered cautiously. Instrumentation technique selection should be based on clinical context, operator experience, and patient factors. Further clinical studies are needed for validation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:18:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a167f285ad714314afefc74ca14553df |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:18:24Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-a167f285ad714314afefc74ca14553df2024-04-04T16:37:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062024-01-0116571171310.4103/jpbs.jpbs_960_23Microscopic evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with different hand and nickel-titanium files; An In Vitro studyHiral Milap KariaIshita VaghelaArchan DhaneshaMrugnayaniPranav SolankiRangesing RathwaBackground: Effective endodontic instrumentation aims to remove microorganisms, debris, and tissue from the root canal while maintaining dentinal integrity. This study compares dentinal defect incidence following canal preparation with different hand files, nickel-titanium rotary files, and reciprocating files. Materials and Methods: Eighty single-rooted mandibular premolars with mature apices were collected. Four groups (n = 20) were established based on canal patency establishment, canal preparation technique, irrigation solution, and final irrigation. After root sectioning at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm from the apex, slices were examined under a stereomicroscope, and dentinal defects were recorded. A second examiner reviewed the images. Results: The results showed significant difference of P = 0.031 among Hand files vs. Rotary ProTaper files: In Hand files vs. Reciprocating WaveOne files significant difference was P = 0.048, and for rotary ProTaper files vs. Reciprocating WaveOne files: No significant difference (P = 0.643). Dentinal defect counts were similar at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm. Statistically significant variation was observed between hand files and rotary files, as well as hand files and reciprocating files. Conclusion: Both rotary and reciprocating files showed a statistically significant increase in dentinal defect incidence compared to hand files. However, clinical implications should be considered cautiously. Instrumentation technique selection should be based on clinical context, operator experience, and patient factors. Further clinical studies are needed for validation.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=711;epage=713;aulast=Kariadentinal defectsendodonticshand filesin vitro studynickel-titanium filesroot canal preparation |
| spellingShingle | Hiral Milap Karia Ishita Vaghela Archan Dhanesha Mrugnayani Pranav Solanki Rangesing Rathwa Microscopic evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with different hand and nickel-titanium files; An In Vitro study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences dentinal defects endodontics hand files in vitro study nickel-titanium files root canal preparation |
| title | Microscopic evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with different hand and nickel-titanium files; An In Vitro study |
| title_full | Microscopic evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with different hand and nickel-titanium files; An In Vitro study |
| title_fullStr | Microscopic evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with different hand and nickel-titanium files; An In Vitro study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Microscopic evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with different hand and nickel-titanium files; An In Vitro study |
| title_short | Microscopic evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with different hand and nickel-titanium files; An In Vitro study |
| title_sort | microscopic evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with different hand and nickel titanium files an in vitro study |
| topic | dentinal defects endodontics hand files in vitro study nickel-titanium files root canal preparation |
| url | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=711;epage=713;aulast=Karia |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hiralmilapkaria microscopicevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationwithdifferenthandandnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy AT ishitavaghela microscopicevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationwithdifferenthandandnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy AT archandhanesha microscopicevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationwithdifferenthandandnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy AT mrugnayani microscopicevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationwithdifferenthandandnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy AT pranavsolanki microscopicevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationwithdifferenthandandnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy AT rangesingrathwa microscopicevaluationofdentinaldefectsafterrootcanalpreparationwithdifferenthandandnickeltitaniumfilesaninvitrostudy |