Centralized versus Decentralized Cleanup of River Water Pollution: An Application to the Ganges
We exploit the public good attributes of Ganges water pollution cleanup and theoretically analyze an aggregate economy of two cities—Kanpur and Varanasi—through which the Ganges flows. Our specific objective is to study whether water pollution cleanup in these two cities ought to be provided in a ce...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Games |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/14/5/66 |
| _version_ | 1797626775354736640 |
|---|---|
| author | Amitrajeet A. Batabyal Hamid Beladi |
| author_facet | Amitrajeet A. Batabyal Hamid Beladi |
| author_sort | Amitrajeet A. Batabyal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We exploit the public good attributes of Ganges water pollution cleanup and theoretically analyze an aggregate economy of two cities—Kanpur and Varanasi—through which the Ganges flows. Our specific objective is to study whether water pollution cleanup in these two cities ought to be provided in a centralized or in a decentralized manner. We first determine the <i>efficient</i> cleanup amounts that maximize the aggregate surplus from making the Ganges cleaner in the two cities. Second, we compute the optimal amount of water pollution cleanup in the two cities in a <i>decentralized</i> regime in which spending on cleanup is financed by a uniform tax on the city residents. Third, we ascertain the optimal amount of water pollution cleanup in the two cities in a <i>centralized</i> regime subject to equal provision of cleanup and cost sharing. Fourth, we show that if the two cities have the <i>same</i> preference for pollution cleanup, then centralization is preferable to decentralization as long as there is a spillover from pollution cleanup. Finally, we show that if the two cities have <i>dissimilar</i> preferences for pollution cleanup, then centralization is preferable to decentralization as long as the spillover exceeds a certain threshold. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T10:14:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a16d5590a43d43f1b1cda394f1554110 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2073-4336 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T10:14:59Z |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Games |
| spelling | doaj.art-a16d5590a43d43f1b1cda394f15541102023-11-16T10:24:40ZengMDPI AGGames2073-43362023-10-011456610.3390/g14050066Centralized versus Decentralized Cleanup of River Water Pollution: An Application to the GangesAmitrajeet A. Batabyal0Hamid Beladi1Department of Economics and Sustainability, Rochester Institute of Technology, 92 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623-5604, USADepartment of Economics, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249-0631, USAWe exploit the public good attributes of Ganges water pollution cleanup and theoretically analyze an aggregate economy of two cities—Kanpur and Varanasi—through which the Ganges flows. Our specific objective is to study whether water pollution cleanup in these two cities ought to be provided in a centralized or in a decentralized manner. We first determine the <i>efficient</i> cleanup amounts that maximize the aggregate surplus from making the Ganges cleaner in the two cities. Second, we compute the optimal amount of water pollution cleanup in the two cities in a <i>decentralized</i> regime in which spending on cleanup is financed by a uniform tax on the city residents. Third, we ascertain the optimal amount of water pollution cleanup in the two cities in a <i>centralized</i> regime subject to equal provision of cleanup and cost sharing. Fourth, we show that if the two cities have the <i>same</i> preference for pollution cleanup, then centralization is preferable to decentralization as long as there is a spillover from pollution cleanup. Finally, we show that if the two cities have <i>dissimilar</i> preferences for pollution cleanup, then centralization is preferable to decentralization as long as the spillover exceeds a certain threshold.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/14/5/66Gangespollution cleanupspilloveruncertaintywater pollution |
| spellingShingle | Amitrajeet A. Batabyal Hamid Beladi Centralized versus Decentralized Cleanup of River Water Pollution: An Application to the Ganges Games Ganges pollution cleanup spillover uncertainty water pollution |
| title | Centralized versus Decentralized Cleanup of River Water Pollution: An Application to the Ganges |
| title_full | Centralized versus Decentralized Cleanup of River Water Pollution: An Application to the Ganges |
| title_fullStr | Centralized versus Decentralized Cleanup of River Water Pollution: An Application to the Ganges |
| title_full_unstemmed | Centralized versus Decentralized Cleanup of River Water Pollution: An Application to the Ganges |
| title_short | Centralized versus Decentralized Cleanup of River Water Pollution: An Application to the Ganges |
| title_sort | centralized versus decentralized cleanup of river water pollution an application to the ganges |
| topic | Ganges pollution cleanup spillover uncertainty water pollution |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/14/5/66 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amitrajeetabatabyal centralizedversusdecentralizedcleanupofriverwaterpollutionanapplicationtotheganges AT hamidbeladi centralizedversusdecentralizedcleanupofriverwaterpollutionanapplicationtotheganges |