Performance Benchmarking and Analysis of Prognostic Methods for CMAPSS Datasets

Six years and more than seventy publications later this paper looks back and analyzes the development of prognostic algorithms using C-MAPSS datasets generated and disseminated by the prognostic center of excellence at NASA Ames Research Center. Among those datasets are five run-to-failure CMAPSS da...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emmanuel Ramasso, Abhinav Saxena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Prognostics and Health Management Society 2014-06-01
Series:International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2236
_version_ 1819126225342300160
author Emmanuel Ramasso
Abhinav Saxena
author_facet Emmanuel Ramasso
Abhinav Saxena
author_sort Emmanuel Ramasso
collection DOAJ
description Six years and more than seventy publications later this paper looks back and analyzes the development of prognostic algorithms using C-MAPSS datasets generated and disseminated by the prognostic center of excellence at NASA Ames Research Center. Among those datasets are five run-to-failure CMAPSS datasets that have been popular due to various characteristics applicable to prognostics. The C-MAPSS datasets pose several challenges that are inherent to general prognostics applications. In particular, management of high variability due to sensor noise, effects of operating conditions, and presence of multiple simultaneous fault modes are some factors that have great impact on the generalization capabilities of prognostics algorithms. More than seventy publications have used the C-MAPSS datasets for developing datadriven prognostic algorithms. However, in the absence of performance benchmarking results and due to common misunderstandings in interpreting the relationships between these datasets, it has been difficult for the users to suitably compare their results. In addition to identifying differentiating characteristics in these datasets, this paper also provides performance results for the PHM’08 data challenge wining entries to serve as performance baseline. This paper summarizes various prognostic modeling efforts that used C-MAPSS datasets and provides guidelines and references to further usage of these datasets in a manner that allows clear and consistent comparison between different approaches.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T07:52:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a1733d6b90614b18aa375234ff837f24
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2153-2648
2153-2648
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T07:52:39Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher The Prognostics and Health Management Society
record_format Article
series International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
spelling doaj.art-a1733d6b90614b18aa375234ff837f242022-12-21T18:33:27ZengThe Prognostics and Health Management SocietyInternational Journal of Prognostics and Health Management2153-26482153-26482014-06-0152doi:10.36001/ijphm.2014.v5i2.2236Performance Benchmarking and Analysis of Prognostic Methods for CMAPSS DatasetsEmmanuel Ramasso0Abhinav Saxena1FEMTO-ST Institute, Dep. AS2M/DMA, UMR CNRS 6174 - UFC / ENSMM / UTBM, 25000 Besanc¸on, FranceSGT Inc., NASA Ames Research Center, Intelligent Systems Division, Moffett Field, CA, 94035-1000, USASix years and more than seventy publications later this paper looks back and analyzes the development of prognostic algorithms using C-MAPSS datasets generated and disseminated by the prognostic center of excellence at NASA Ames Research Center. Among those datasets are five run-to-failure CMAPSS datasets that have been popular due to various characteristics applicable to prognostics. The C-MAPSS datasets pose several challenges that are inherent to general prognostics applications. In particular, management of high variability due to sensor noise, effects of operating conditions, and presence of multiple simultaneous fault modes are some factors that have great impact on the generalization capabilities of prognostics algorithms. More than seventy publications have used the C-MAPSS datasets for developing datadriven prognostic algorithms. However, in the absence of performance benchmarking results and due to common misunderstandings in interpreting the relationships between these datasets, it has been difficult for the users to suitably compare their results. In addition to identifying differentiating characteristics in these datasets, this paper also provides performance results for the PHM’08 data challenge wining entries to serve as performance baseline. This paper summarizes various prognostic modeling efforts that used C-MAPSS datasets and provides guidelines and references to further usage of these datasets in a manner that allows clear and consistent comparison between different approaches.https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2236prognosticsreviewbenchmarkingc-mapss datasets
spellingShingle Emmanuel Ramasso
Abhinav Saxena
Performance Benchmarking and Analysis of Prognostic Methods for CMAPSS Datasets
International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
prognostics
review
benchmarking
c-mapss datasets
title Performance Benchmarking and Analysis of Prognostic Methods for CMAPSS Datasets
title_full Performance Benchmarking and Analysis of Prognostic Methods for CMAPSS Datasets
title_fullStr Performance Benchmarking and Analysis of Prognostic Methods for CMAPSS Datasets
title_full_unstemmed Performance Benchmarking and Analysis of Prognostic Methods for CMAPSS Datasets
title_short Performance Benchmarking and Analysis of Prognostic Methods for CMAPSS Datasets
title_sort performance benchmarking and analysis of prognostic methods for cmapss datasets
topic prognostics
review
benchmarking
c-mapss datasets
url https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/ijphm/article/view/2236
work_keys_str_mv AT emmanuelramasso performancebenchmarkingandanalysisofprognosticmethodsforcmapssdatasets
AT abhinavsaxena performancebenchmarkingandanalysisofprognosticmethodsforcmapssdatasets