Posttreatment of 3D‐printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols
Abstract This mini‐review presents an overview of recent trends for 3D printed sensors and biosensors (with a focus on Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) based technology), along with their posttreatment surfaces to improve electrochemical applications. The protocols described in the literature and adv...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley-VCH
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Electrochemical Science Advances |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/elsa.202100136 |
| _version_ | 1828717854448418816 |
|---|---|
| author | Diego P. Rocha Raquel G. Rocha Sílvia V. F. Castro Magno A. G. Trindade Rodrigo A. A. Munoz Eduardo M. Richter Lucio Angnes |
| author_facet | Diego P. Rocha Raquel G. Rocha Sílvia V. F. Castro Magno A. G. Trindade Rodrigo A. A. Munoz Eduardo M. Richter Lucio Angnes |
| author_sort | Diego P. Rocha |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract This mini‐review presents an overview of recent trends for 3D printed sensors and biosensors (with a focus on Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) based technology), along with their posttreatment surfaces to improve electrochemical applications. The protocols described in the literature and advances in this field were covered, bringing a critical discussion about the achievements and limitations to improve the electrical properties of conducting filaments, as well as their electroanalytical performance. In addition, the pros and cons of the processes used in surface posttreatment to improve the performance of electrodes constructed by FDM are presented, comparing the time consumed during chemical and electrochemical treatments or combining the two to improve the characteristics of the sensors. Finally, the discussion about the real necessity of surface treatments of electrodes constructed by FDM technology, the techniques used for this, and some ecological protocols are discussed (surface posttreatments with and without reagents) or whether the simple optimization of printing parameters could also significantly improve the electrochemical performance of sensors built with such technologies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T14:34:27Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a193a3b77195459fb40ee971a321f9ad |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2698-5977 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T14:34:27Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | Wiley-VCH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Electrochemical Science Advances |
| spelling | doaj.art-a193a3b77195459fb40ee971a321f9ad2023-08-17T12:00:55ZengWiley-VCHElectrochemical Science Advances2698-59772022-10-0125n/an/a10.1002/elsa.202100136Posttreatment of 3D‐printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocolsDiego P. Rocha0Raquel G. Rocha1Sílvia V. F. Castro2Magno A. G. Trindade3Rodrigo A. A. Munoz4Eduardo M. Richter5Lucio Angnes6Instituto de Química Universidade de São Paulo Sao Paulo BrazilInstituto de Química Universidade Federal de Uberlândia berlândia BrazilInstituto de Química Universidade Federal de Uberlândia berlândia BrazilFaculdade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados Dourados BrazilInstituto de Química Universidade Federal de Uberlândia berlândia BrazilInstituto de Química Universidade Federal de Uberlândia berlândia BrazilInstituto de Química Universidade de São Paulo Sao Paulo BrazilAbstract This mini‐review presents an overview of recent trends for 3D printed sensors and biosensors (with a focus on Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) based technology), along with their posttreatment surfaces to improve electrochemical applications. The protocols described in the literature and advances in this field were covered, bringing a critical discussion about the achievements and limitations to improve the electrical properties of conducting filaments, as well as their electroanalytical performance. In addition, the pros and cons of the processes used in surface posttreatment to improve the performance of electrodes constructed by FDM are presented, comparing the time consumed during chemical and electrochemical treatments or combining the two to improve the characteristics of the sensors. Finally, the discussion about the real necessity of surface treatments of electrodes constructed by FDM technology, the techniques used for this, and some ecological protocols are discussed (surface posttreatments with and without reagents) or whether the simple optimization of printing parameters could also significantly improve the electrochemical performance of sensors built with such technologies.https://doi.org/10.1002/elsa.2021001363D printed sensorsConducting polymersElectroanalytical applicationsFused deposition modelingSurface posttreatment |
| spellingShingle | Diego P. Rocha Raquel G. Rocha Sílvia V. F. Castro Magno A. G. Trindade Rodrigo A. A. Munoz Eduardo M. Richter Lucio Angnes Posttreatment of 3D‐printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols Electrochemical Science Advances 3D printed sensors Conducting polymers Electroanalytical applications Fused deposition modeling Surface posttreatment |
| title | Posttreatment of 3D‐printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
| title_full | Posttreatment of 3D‐printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
| title_fullStr | Posttreatment of 3D‐printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
| title_full_unstemmed | Posttreatment of 3D‐printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
| title_short | Posttreatment of 3D‐printed surfaces for electrochemical applications: A critical review on proposed protocols |
| title_sort | posttreatment of 3d printed surfaces for electrochemical applications a critical review on proposed protocols |
| topic | 3D printed sensors Conducting polymers Electroanalytical applications Fused deposition modeling Surface posttreatment |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/elsa.202100136 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT diegoprocha posttreatmentof3dprintedsurfacesforelectrochemicalapplicationsacriticalreviewonproposedprotocols AT raquelgrocha posttreatmentof3dprintedsurfacesforelectrochemicalapplicationsacriticalreviewonproposedprotocols AT silviavfcastro posttreatmentof3dprintedsurfacesforelectrochemicalapplicationsacriticalreviewonproposedprotocols AT magnoagtrindade posttreatmentof3dprintedsurfacesforelectrochemicalapplicationsacriticalreviewonproposedprotocols AT rodrigoaamunoz posttreatmentof3dprintedsurfacesforelectrochemicalapplicationsacriticalreviewonproposedprotocols AT eduardomrichter posttreatmentof3dprintedsurfacesforelectrochemicalapplicationsacriticalreviewonproposedprotocols AT lucioangnes posttreatmentof3dprintedsurfacesforelectrochemicalapplicationsacriticalreviewonproposedprotocols |