Comparing Different Methods to Estimate the Combined Mesiodistal Widths of Maxillary and Mandibular Incisors

Objective:This study aimed to develop regression equations to predict the combined mesiodistal widths of maxillary and mandibular incisors from each other and compare them with other methods.Methods:One hundred pairs of study models from 100 Iraqi subjects with normal occlusion were used in this stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammed Nahidh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2018-12-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparing-different-methods-to-estimate-the-combin/53451
Description
Summary:Objective:This study aimed to develop regression equations to predict the combined mesiodistal widths of maxillary and mandibular incisors from each other and compare them with other methods.Methods:One hundred pairs of study models from 100 Iraqi subjects with normal occlusion were used in this study. The individualized mesiodistal widths of maxillary and mandibular incisors were measured using electronic digital calipers. The combined mesiodistal widths of maxillary and mandibular incisors were calculated according to Tonn’s and Abhi’s formulas and from regression equations to be compared with the actual one.Results:Both sums of the maxillary and mandibular incisors were significantly correlated. There were significantly high differences between the actual and calculated sum widths, and also between the calculated and predicted ones. On the other hand, a non-significant difference was obtained between the actual and predicted sum widths of maxillary and mandibular incisors.Conclusion:Tonn’s and Abhi’s methods are not reliable methods to calculate the sum widths of maxillary and mandibular incisors. New regression equations are developed to predict the sum widths of maxillary and mandibular incisors from each other.
ISSN:2528-9659
2148-9505