The sizzle and fizzle of teacher evaluation in the United States and the selective use of research evidence
In 2009, the United States funded the largest federal educational reform effort in the nation’s history. Referred to as Race to the Top (RTTT), a cornerstone of this effort was the high-stakes evaluation of all teachers, with a significant emphasis on the use of highly researched statistical methods...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-08-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1221569/full |
| _version_ | 1797738609715970048 |
|---|---|
| author | Drew H. Gitomer Brittany L. Marshall |
| author_facet | Drew H. Gitomer Brittany L. Marshall |
| author_sort | Drew H. Gitomer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In 2009, the United States funded the largest federal educational reform effort in the nation’s history. Referred to as Race to the Top (RTTT), a cornerstone of this effort was the high-stakes evaluation of all teachers, with a significant emphasis on the use of highly researched statistical methods that ascribed changes in student test scores to a teacher’s quality. The widespread endorsement of these policies across a broad range of the political spectrum was based on a theory of action that faced technical, organizational, and political challenges. Enthusiasm for these evaluation efforts was substantially muted in a mere 5 years. Among a number of factors, we argue that the framing of the problem together with privileging particular lines of research and voices, as well as the lack of consideration of other frames and attention to other research and voices, resulted in an evidence base that was wholly insufficient to justify the large-scale policy changes that were enacted. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:46:17Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a1ab82bfe35a443fb7cbeb667727ee1e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2504-284X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:46:17Z |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Education |
| spelling | doaj.art-a1ab82bfe35a443fb7cbeb667727ee1e2023-08-23T09:10:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2023-08-01810.3389/feduc.2023.12215691221569The sizzle and fizzle of teacher evaluation in the United States and the selective use of research evidenceDrew H. GitomerBrittany L. MarshallIn 2009, the United States funded the largest federal educational reform effort in the nation’s history. Referred to as Race to the Top (RTTT), a cornerstone of this effort was the high-stakes evaluation of all teachers, with a significant emphasis on the use of highly researched statistical methods that ascribed changes in student test scores to a teacher’s quality. The widespread endorsement of these policies across a broad range of the political spectrum was based on a theory of action that faced technical, organizational, and political challenges. Enthusiasm for these evaluation efforts was substantially muted in a mere 5 years. Among a number of factors, we argue that the framing of the problem together with privileging particular lines of research and voices, as well as the lack of consideration of other frames and attention to other research and voices, resulted in an evidence base that was wholly insufficient to justify the large-scale policy changes that were enacted.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1221569/fullteacher evaluationassessmentevidence useteacher qualitypolicy formation |
| spellingShingle | Drew H. Gitomer Brittany L. Marshall The sizzle and fizzle of teacher evaluation in the United States and the selective use of research evidence Frontiers in Education teacher evaluation assessment evidence use teacher quality policy formation |
| title | The sizzle and fizzle of teacher evaluation in the United States and the selective use of research evidence |
| title_full | The sizzle and fizzle of teacher evaluation in the United States and the selective use of research evidence |
| title_fullStr | The sizzle and fizzle of teacher evaluation in the United States and the selective use of research evidence |
| title_full_unstemmed | The sizzle and fizzle of teacher evaluation in the United States and the selective use of research evidence |
| title_short | The sizzle and fizzle of teacher evaluation in the United States and the selective use of research evidence |
| title_sort | sizzle and fizzle of teacher evaluation in the united states and the selective use of research evidence |
| topic | teacher evaluation assessment evidence use teacher quality policy formation |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1221569/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT drewhgitomer thesizzleandfizzleofteacherevaluationintheunitedstatesandtheselectiveuseofresearchevidence AT brittanylmarshall thesizzleandfizzleofteacherevaluationintheunitedstatesandtheselectiveuseofresearchevidence AT drewhgitomer sizzleandfizzleofteacherevaluationintheunitedstatesandtheselectiveuseofresearchevidence AT brittanylmarshall sizzleandfizzleofteacherevaluationintheunitedstatesandtheselectiveuseofresearchevidence |