Value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes for prognostic assessment of colon mucinous adenocarcinoma: Analysis and external validation

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the impact of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) on cancer‐specific survival (CSS) in colon mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) patients, compared with pN stage and the lymph nodes ratio (LNR). Methods A total of 10,182 colon MAC patients from the Surveillance, Epide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huajun Cai, Tianbao Xu, Zhicheng Zhuang, Yiyi Zhang, Yuan Gao, Xing Liu, Jinfu Zhuang, Yuanfeng Yang, Guoxian Guan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-12-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4366
_version_ 1819022451848249344
author Huajun Cai
Tianbao Xu
Zhicheng Zhuang
Yiyi Zhang
Yuan Gao
Xing Liu
Jinfu Zhuang
Yuanfeng Yang
Guoxian Guan
author_facet Huajun Cai
Tianbao Xu
Zhicheng Zhuang
Yiyi Zhang
Yuan Gao
Xing Liu
Jinfu Zhuang
Yuanfeng Yang
Guoxian Guan
author_sort Huajun Cai
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose To evaluate the impact of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) on cancer‐specific survival (CSS) in colon mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) patients, compared with pN stage and the lymph nodes ratio (LNR). Methods A total of 10,182 colon MAC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were divided into the training group. The external validation group included 153 patients from Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. The Cox regression method was used to identify prognostic risk factors. Nomograms were evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C‐index) and calibration curves. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to develop a novel staging system. Results Time‐dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) to predict CSS showed the areas under the ROC curve of LODDS were always higher than pN stage and LNR. LNR and LODDS classifications can well distinguish the prognosis of patients with the same pN stage. Cox analyses indicated that age, tumor size, pT stage, pN stage, LNR, and LODDS were independent predictors of CSS (p < 0.05). Based on three lymph nodes classifications, we constructed three prognostic nomograms models for CSS. The C‐index of the pN, LNR, and LODDS classification nomograms were 0.746 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.736–0.756), 0.750 (95% CI: 0.740–0.760), and 0.758 (95% CI: 0.748–0.768), respectively. In external validation, we observed the C‐index of LODDS classification nomograms was 0.787 (95% CI: 0.648–0.926). RPA stage, including four stages, was constructed successfully based on pT stage and LNR or LODDS, respectively. The 3‐, 5‐, and 8‐year areas under the ROC curve of LNR‐RPA stage and LODDS‐RPA stage were superior to tumor‐node‐metastasis stage. Conclusion LODDS to be a better prognostic factor of CSS for colon MAC patients than pN stage and LNR. A nomogram and RPA stage base on LODDS can provide accurate information for personalized cancer treatment.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T04:23:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a1b7a9b94e1c475184be482f5e0547b2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T04:23:13Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a1b7a9b94e1c475184be482f5e0547b22022-12-21T19:16:07ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342021-12-0110238542855710.1002/cam4.4366Value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes for prognostic assessment of colon mucinous adenocarcinoma: Analysis and external validationHuajun Cai0Tianbao Xu1Zhicheng Zhuang2Yiyi Zhang3Yuan Gao4Xing Liu5Jinfu Zhuang6Yuanfeng Yang7Guoxian Guan8Department of Colorectal Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou ChinaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou ChinaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou ChinaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou ChinaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou ChinaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou ChinaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou ChinaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou ChinaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou ChinaAbstract Purpose To evaluate the impact of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) on cancer‐specific survival (CSS) in colon mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) patients, compared with pN stage and the lymph nodes ratio (LNR). Methods A total of 10,182 colon MAC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were divided into the training group. The external validation group included 153 patients from Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. The Cox regression method was used to identify prognostic risk factors. Nomograms were evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C‐index) and calibration curves. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to develop a novel staging system. Results Time‐dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) to predict CSS showed the areas under the ROC curve of LODDS were always higher than pN stage and LNR. LNR and LODDS classifications can well distinguish the prognosis of patients with the same pN stage. Cox analyses indicated that age, tumor size, pT stage, pN stage, LNR, and LODDS were independent predictors of CSS (p < 0.05). Based on three lymph nodes classifications, we constructed three prognostic nomograms models for CSS. The C‐index of the pN, LNR, and LODDS classification nomograms were 0.746 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.736–0.756), 0.750 (95% CI: 0.740–0.760), and 0.758 (95% CI: 0.748–0.768), respectively. In external validation, we observed the C‐index of LODDS classification nomograms was 0.787 (95% CI: 0.648–0.926). RPA stage, including four stages, was constructed successfully based on pT stage and LNR or LODDS, respectively. The 3‐, 5‐, and 8‐year areas under the ROC curve of LNR‐RPA stage and LODDS‐RPA stage were superior to tumor‐node‐metastasis stage. Conclusion LODDS to be a better prognostic factor of CSS for colon MAC patients than pN stage and LNR. A nomogram and RPA stage base on LODDS can provide accurate information for personalized cancer treatment.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4366colon mucinous adenocarcinomaLODDSnomogramsprognosisRPA stage
spellingShingle Huajun Cai
Tianbao Xu
Zhicheng Zhuang
Yiyi Zhang
Yuan Gao
Xing Liu
Jinfu Zhuang
Yuanfeng Yang
Guoxian Guan
Value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes for prognostic assessment of colon mucinous adenocarcinoma: Analysis and external validation
Cancer Medicine
colon mucinous adenocarcinoma
LODDS
nomograms
prognosis
RPA stage
title Value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes for prognostic assessment of colon mucinous adenocarcinoma: Analysis and external validation
title_full Value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes for prognostic assessment of colon mucinous adenocarcinoma: Analysis and external validation
title_fullStr Value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes for prognostic assessment of colon mucinous adenocarcinoma: Analysis and external validation
title_full_unstemmed Value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes for prognostic assessment of colon mucinous adenocarcinoma: Analysis and external validation
title_short Value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes for prognostic assessment of colon mucinous adenocarcinoma: Analysis and external validation
title_sort value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes for prognostic assessment of colon mucinous adenocarcinoma analysis and external validation
topic colon mucinous adenocarcinoma
LODDS
nomograms
prognosis
RPA stage
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4366
work_keys_str_mv AT huajuncai valueofthelogoddsofpositivelymphnodesforprognosticassessmentofcolonmucinousadenocarcinomaanalysisandexternalvalidation
AT tianbaoxu valueofthelogoddsofpositivelymphnodesforprognosticassessmentofcolonmucinousadenocarcinomaanalysisandexternalvalidation
AT zhichengzhuang valueofthelogoddsofpositivelymphnodesforprognosticassessmentofcolonmucinousadenocarcinomaanalysisandexternalvalidation
AT yiyizhang valueofthelogoddsofpositivelymphnodesforprognosticassessmentofcolonmucinousadenocarcinomaanalysisandexternalvalidation
AT yuangao valueofthelogoddsofpositivelymphnodesforprognosticassessmentofcolonmucinousadenocarcinomaanalysisandexternalvalidation
AT xingliu valueofthelogoddsofpositivelymphnodesforprognosticassessmentofcolonmucinousadenocarcinomaanalysisandexternalvalidation
AT jinfuzhuang valueofthelogoddsofpositivelymphnodesforprognosticassessmentofcolonmucinousadenocarcinomaanalysisandexternalvalidation
AT yuanfengyang valueofthelogoddsofpositivelymphnodesforprognosticassessmentofcolonmucinousadenocarcinomaanalysisandexternalvalidation
AT guoxianguan valueofthelogoddsofpositivelymphnodesforprognosticassessmentofcolonmucinousadenocarcinomaanalysisandexternalvalidation