Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BackgroundBone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been considered a well-established method for treating knee and ankle osteochondral lesions. Some studies have also shown that BMS can promote healing of the repaired tendon and enhance biomechanical properties during rotator cuff repair. Our purpose was t...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-02-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1047483/full |
_version_ | 1797901751935827968 |
---|---|
author | Lei Zhang Yanlin Zhu Tianhao Xu Weili Fu |
author_facet | Lei Zhang Yanlin Zhu Tianhao Xu Weili Fu |
author_sort | Lei Zhang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | BackgroundBone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been considered a well-established method for treating knee and ankle osteochondral lesions. Some studies have also shown that BMS can promote healing of the repaired tendon and enhance biomechanical properties during rotator cuff repair. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair rotator cuff (ARCR) with and without BMS.MethodsA systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 20, 2022. Data on retear rates, shoulder functional outcomes, visual analog score and range of motion were pooled and analyzed. Dichotomous variables were presented as odds ratios (OR), and continuous variables were presented as mean differences (MD). Meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3.ResultsEight studies involving 674 patients were included, with mean follow-up period ranging from 12 to 36.8 months. Compared to ARCR alone, the intraoperative combination of the BMS resulted in lower retear rates (P < 0.0001), but showed similar results in Constant score (P = 0.10), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score (P = 0.57), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (P = 0.23), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (P = 0.31), VAS (visual analog score) score (P = 0.34), and range of motion (ROM) (forward flexion, P = 0.42; external rotation, P = 0.21). After sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses, no significant changes in statistical results were observed.ConclusionCompared to ARCR alone, the combination of intraoperative BMS can significantly reduce the retear rates, but showed similar short-term results in functional outcomes, ROM and pain. Better clinical outcomes are anticipated in the BMS group by improving structural integrity during long-term follow-up. Currently, BMS may be a viable option in ARCR based on its straightforward and cost-effective advantages.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022323379. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T09:06:51Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a1bb9ec510d242e5931529ca07720566 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-875X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T09:06:51Z |
publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Surgery |
spelling | doaj.art-a1bb9ec510d242e5931529ca077205662023-02-21T06:40:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2023-02-011010.3389/fsurg.2023.10474831047483Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysisLei ZhangYanlin ZhuTianhao XuWeili FuBackgroundBone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been considered a well-established method for treating knee and ankle osteochondral lesions. Some studies have also shown that BMS can promote healing of the repaired tendon and enhance biomechanical properties during rotator cuff repair. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair rotator cuff (ARCR) with and without BMS.MethodsA systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 20, 2022. Data on retear rates, shoulder functional outcomes, visual analog score and range of motion were pooled and analyzed. Dichotomous variables were presented as odds ratios (OR), and continuous variables were presented as mean differences (MD). Meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3.ResultsEight studies involving 674 patients were included, with mean follow-up period ranging from 12 to 36.8 months. Compared to ARCR alone, the intraoperative combination of the BMS resulted in lower retear rates (P < 0.0001), but showed similar results in Constant score (P = 0.10), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score (P = 0.57), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (P = 0.23), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (P = 0.31), VAS (visual analog score) score (P = 0.34), and range of motion (ROM) (forward flexion, P = 0.42; external rotation, P = 0.21). After sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses, no significant changes in statistical results were observed.ConclusionCompared to ARCR alone, the combination of intraoperative BMS can significantly reduce the retear rates, but showed similar short-term results in functional outcomes, ROM and pain. Better clinical outcomes are anticipated in the BMS group by improving structural integrity during long-term follow-up. Currently, BMS may be a viable option in ARCR based on its straightforward and cost-effective advantages.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022323379.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1047483/fullrotator cuff retearbone marrow stimulationmicrofracturearthroscopic rotator cuff repairglenohumeral osteoarthritismeta-analysis |
spellingShingle | Lei Zhang Yanlin Zhu Tianhao Xu Weili Fu Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis Frontiers in Surgery rotator cuff retear bone marrow stimulation microfracture arthroscopic rotator cuff repair glenohumeral osteoarthritis meta-analysis |
title | Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates a systematic review and meta analysis |
topic | rotator cuff retear bone marrow stimulation microfracture arthroscopic rotator cuff repair glenohumeral osteoarthritis meta-analysis |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1047483/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leizhang bonemarrowstimulationinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairisacosteffectiveandstraightforwardtechniquetoreduceretearratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanlinzhu bonemarrowstimulationinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairisacosteffectiveandstraightforwardtechniquetoreduceretearratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tianhaoxu bonemarrowstimulationinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairisacosteffectiveandstraightforwardtechniquetoreduceretearratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT weilifu bonemarrowstimulationinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairisacosteffectiveandstraightforwardtechniquetoreduceretearratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |