Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundBone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been considered a well-established method for treating knee and ankle osteochondral lesions. Some studies have also shown that BMS can promote healing of the repaired tendon and enhance biomechanical properties during rotator cuff repair. Our purpose was t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lei Zhang, Yanlin Zhu, Tianhao Xu, Weili Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1047483/full
_version_ 1797901751935827968
author Lei Zhang
Yanlin Zhu
Tianhao Xu
Weili Fu
author_facet Lei Zhang
Yanlin Zhu
Tianhao Xu
Weili Fu
author_sort Lei Zhang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundBone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been considered a well-established method for treating knee and ankle osteochondral lesions. Some studies have also shown that BMS can promote healing of the repaired tendon and enhance biomechanical properties during rotator cuff repair. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair rotator cuff (ARCR) with and without BMS.MethodsA systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 20, 2022. Data on retear rates, shoulder functional outcomes, visual analog score and range of motion were pooled and analyzed. Dichotomous variables were presented as odds ratios (OR), and continuous variables were presented as mean differences (MD). Meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3.ResultsEight studies involving 674 patients were included, with mean follow-up period ranging from 12 to 36.8 months. Compared to ARCR alone, the intraoperative combination of the BMS resulted in lower retear rates (P < 0.0001), but showed similar results in Constant score (P = 0.10), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score (P = 0.57), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (P = 0.23), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (P = 0.31), VAS (visual analog score) score (P = 0.34), and range of motion (ROM) (forward flexion, P = 0.42; external rotation, P = 0.21). After sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses, no significant changes in statistical results were observed.ConclusionCompared to ARCR alone, the combination of intraoperative BMS can significantly reduce the retear rates, but showed similar short-term results in functional outcomes, ROM and pain. Better clinical outcomes are anticipated in the BMS group by improving structural integrity during long-term follow-up. Currently, BMS may be a viable option in ARCR based on its straightforward and cost-effective advantages.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022323379.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:06:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a1bb9ec510d242e5931529ca07720566
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-875X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:06:51Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj.art-a1bb9ec510d242e5931529ca077205662023-02-21T06:40:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2023-02-011010.3389/fsurg.2023.10474831047483Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysisLei ZhangYanlin ZhuTianhao XuWeili FuBackgroundBone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been considered a well-established method for treating knee and ankle osteochondral lesions. Some studies have also shown that BMS can promote healing of the repaired tendon and enhance biomechanical properties during rotator cuff repair. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair rotator cuff (ARCR) with and without BMS.MethodsA systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 20, 2022. Data on retear rates, shoulder functional outcomes, visual analog score and range of motion were pooled and analyzed. Dichotomous variables were presented as odds ratios (OR), and continuous variables were presented as mean differences (MD). Meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3.ResultsEight studies involving 674 patients were included, with mean follow-up period ranging from 12 to 36.8 months. Compared to ARCR alone, the intraoperative combination of the BMS resulted in lower retear rates (P < 0.0001), but showed similar results in Constant score (P = 0.10), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score (P = 0.57), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (P = 0.23), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (P = 0.31), VAS (visual analog score) score (P = 0.34), and range of motion (ROM) (forward flexion, P = 0.42; external rotation, P = 0.21). After sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses, no significant changes in statistical results were observed.ConclusionCompared to ARCR alone, the combination of intraoperative BMS can significantly reduce the retear rates, but showed similar short-term results in functional outcomes, ROM and pain. Better clinical outcomes are anticipated in the BMS group by improving structural integrity during long-term follow-up. Currently, BMS may be a viable option in ARCR based on its straightforward and cost-effective advantages.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022323379.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1047483/fullrotator cuff retearbone marrow stimulationmicrofracturearthroscopic rotator cuff repairglenohumeral osteoarthritismeta-analysis
spellingShingle Lei Zhang
Yanlin Zhu
Tianhao Xu
Weili Fu
Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Frontiers in Surgery
rotator cuff retear
bone marrow stimulation
microfracture
arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
glenohumeral osteoarthritis
meta-analysis
title Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost-effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort bone marrow stimulation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a cost effective and straightforward technique to reduce retear rates a systematic review and meta analysis
topic rotator cuff retear
bone marrow stimulation
microfracture
arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
glenohumeral osteoarthritis
meta-analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1047483/full
work_keys_str_mv AT leizhang bonemarrowstimulationinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairisacosteffectiveandstraightforwardtechniquetoreduceretearratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanlinzhu bonemarrowstimulationinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairisacosteffectiveandstraightforwardtechniquetoreduceretearratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tianhaoxu bonemarrowstimulationinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairisacosteffectiveandstraightforwardtechniquetoreduceretearratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weilifu bonemarrowstimulationinarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairisacosteffectiveandstraightforwardtechniquetoreduceretearratesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis