Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Concurrent Validity of a Stethoscope and Health App System for the Quantification of Breath Rate in Healthy Adults: Repeatability and Validity Study
BackgroundApps for smartphones that can measure the breathing rate easily can be downloaded. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to demonstrate agreement in measuring breath rates between the stethoscope and Breath Counter health app. MethodsWe performe...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e41845 |
| _version_ | 1797734531096117248 |
|---|---|
| author | Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo Marta Elena Losa Iglesias Oscar David Robles Sanchez |
| author_facet | Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo Marta Elena Losa Iglesias Oscar David Robles Sanchez |
| author_sort | Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundApps for smartphones that can measure the breathing rate easily can be downloaded.
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to demonstrate agreement in measuring breath rates between the stethoscope and Breath Counter health app.
MethodsWe performed a repeatability study with 56 healthy volunteers. The patient’s demographic data and breathing rates per minute were collected. Breathing rates were measured via two methods: (1) using a stethoscope placed in the upper area of the right lung and (2) a Breath Counter app developed by Vadion on a Samsung Fold smartphone.
ResultsThis study demonstrated high repeatability and validity with respect to the breathing rate parameter of healthy adults using the aforementioned 2 systems. Intrasession repeatability measure using the intraclass correlation coefficient was >0.962, indicating excellent repeatability. Moreover, the intraclass correlation coefficient between methods was 0.793, indicating good repeatability, and coefficients of variation of method errors values were 1.83% with very low values in terms of other repeatability parameters. We found significant correlation coefficients and no systematic differences between the app and stethoscope methods.
ConclusionsThe app method may be attractive to individuals who require repeatability in a recreational setting. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:45:41Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a1bbf090e6f0486a9a2b349fe6978249 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1438-8871 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:45:41Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-a1bbf090e6f0486a9a2b349fe69782492023-08-28T23:25:56ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712023-01-0125e4184510.2196/41845Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Concurrent Validity of a Stethoscope and Health App System for the Quantification of Breath Rate in Healthy Adults: Repeatability and Validity StudyRicardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1568-7602Marta Elena Losa Iglesiashttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7588-2069Oscar David Robles Sanchezhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3881-7273 BackgroundApps for smartphones that can measure the breathing rate easily can be downloaded. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to demonstrate agreement in measuring breath rates between the stethoscope and Breath Counter health app. MethodsWe performed a repeatability study with 56 healthy volunteers. The patient’s demographic data and breathing rates per minute were collected. Breathing rates were measured via two methods: (1) using a stethoscope placed in the upper area of the right lung and (2) a Breath Counter app developed by Vadion on a Samsung Fold smartphone. ResultsThis study demonstrated high repeatability and validity with respect to the breathing rate parameter of healthy adults using the aforementioned 2 systems. Intrasession repeatability measure using the intraclass correlation coefficient was >0.962, indicating excellent repeatability. Moreover, the intraclass correlation coefficient between methods was 0.793, indicating good repeatability, and coefficients of variation of method errors values were 1.83% with very low values in terms of other repeatability parameters. We found significant correlation coefficients and no systematic differences between the app and stethoscope methods. ConclusionsThe app method may be attractive to individuals who require repeatability in a recreational setting.https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e41845 |
| spellingShingle | Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo Marta Elena Losa Iglesias Oscar David Robles Sanchez Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Concurrent Validity of a Stethoscope and Health App System for the Quantification of Breath Rate in Healthy Adults: Repeatability and Validity Study Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| title | Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Concurrent Validity of a Stethoscope and Health App System for the Quantification of Breath Rate in Healthy Adults: Repeatability and Validity Study |
| title_full | Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Concurrent Validity of a Stethoscope and Health App System for the Quantification of Breath Rate in Healthy Adults: Repeatability and Validity Study |
| title_fullStr | Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Concurrent Validity of a Stethoscope and Health App System for the Quantification of Breath Rate in Healthy Adults: Repeatability and Validity Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Concurrent Validity of a Stethoscope and Health App System for the Quantification of Breath Rate in Healthy Adults: Repeatability and Validity Study |
| title_short | Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Concurrent Validity of a Stethoscope and Health App System for the Quantification of Breath Rate in Healthy Adults: Repeatability and Validity Study |
| title_sort | repeatability reproducibility and concurrent validity of a stethoscope and health app system for the quantification of breath rate in healthy adults repeatability and validity study |
| url | https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e41845 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ricardobecerrodebengoavallejo repeatabilityreproducibilityandconcurrentvalidityofastethoscopeandhealthappsystemforthequantificationofbreathrateinhealthyadultsrepeatabilityandvaliditystudy AT martaelenalosaiglesias repeatabilityreproducibilityandconcurrentvalidityofastethoscopeandhealthappsystemforthequantificationofbreathrateinhealthyadultsrepeatabilityandvaliditystudy AT oscardavidroblessanchez repeatabilityreproducibilityandconcurrentvalidityofastethoscopeandhealthappsystemforthequantificationofbreathrateinhealthyadultsrepeatabilityandvaliditystudy |