The effect of stressful life events on the risk for psychosis: differences between Mexican at clinical and familial high risk

BackgroundStressful life events (SLEs) in the development of early psychosis have been little studied in low-income countries. This study examines differences in the prevalence of SLEs in Mexican at clinical high risk (CHR) and those with familial high risk for psychosis who do not meet CHR criteria...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lourdes Nieto, Tecelli Domínguez-Martínez, Laura Navarrete, Mauricio Rosel-Vales, Ricardo Saracco-Álvarez, César Celada-Borja, Maria Luisa Rascón-Gasca, Luis Gerardo Moncayo Samperio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1254993/full
_version_ 1827803417461915648
author Lourdes Nieto
Tecelli Domínguez-Martínez
Laura Navarrete
Mauricio Rosel-Vales
Ricardo Saracco-Álvarez
César Celada-Borja
Maria Luisa Rascón-Gasca
Luis Gerardo Moncayo Samperio
author_facet Lourdes Nieto
Tecelli Domínguez-Martínez
Laura Navarrete
Mauricio Rosel-Vales
Ricardo Saracco-Álvarez
César Celada-Borja
Maria Luisa Rascón-Gasca
Luis Gerardo Moncayo Samperio
author_sort Lourdes Nieto
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundStressful life events (SLEs) in the development of early psychosis have been little studied in low-income countries. This study examines differences in the prevalence of SLEs in Mexican at clinical high risk (CHR) and those with familial high risk for psychosis who do not meet CHR criteria (non-CHR FHR). We also analyze the association between SLEs and CHR.MethodsParticipants included 43 persons with CHR and 35 with non-CHR FHR. CHR criteria were assessed with the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental State. SLEs were assessed using the Questionnaire of Stressful Life Events.ResultsParticipants with CHR reported more SLEs associated with negative academic experiences than those in the non-CHR FHR group. Bullying (OR = 7.77, 95% CI [1.81, 33.32]) and low educational level (OR = 21.25, 95% CI [5.19, 46.90]) were the strongest predictors of CHR, while starting to live with a partner (OR = 0.26, 95% CI [0.10, 0.84]) was associated with a lower risk of CHR.ConclusionNegative school experiences increase the risk of psychosis, particularly bullying, suggesting that schools may be ideal settings for implementing individual preventive strategies to reduce risk factors and increase protective factors to improve the prognosis of those at risk of developing psychosis. In Latin America, there are multiple barriers to early intervention in psychosis. It is thus crucial to identify risk and protective factors at the onset and in the course of psychosis in order to design effective preventive interventions.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T20:54:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a1bf711de21847bdb72f4a9215e802af
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T20:54:05Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-a1bf711de21847bdb72f4a9215e802af2023-09-30T21:57:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402023-09-011410.3389/fpsyt.2023.12549931254993The effect of stressful life events on the risk for psychosis: differences between Mexican at clinical and familial high riskLourdes Nieto0Tecelli Domínguez-Martínez1Laura Navarrete2Mauricio Rosel-Vales3Ricardo Saracco-Álvarez4César Celada-Borja5Maria Luisa Rascón-Gasca6Luis Gerardo Moncayo Samperio7Centro de Investigación en Salud Mental Global, Dirección de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Psicosociales, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz-UNAM, Mexico City, MexicoCentro de Investigación en Salud Mental Global, Dirección de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Psicosociales, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz-UNAM, Mexico City, MexicoDepartamento de Estudios Psicosociales en Poblaciones Específicas, Dirección de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Psicosociales, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, MexicoClínica de Esquizofrenia, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, MexicoSubdirección de Investigaciones Clínicas, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, MexicoClínica de Esquizofrenia, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, MexicoDepartamento de Ciencias Sociales en Salud, Direccion de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Psicosociales, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, MexicoDirección de Servicios Clínicos, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, MexicoBackgroundStressful life events (SLEs) in the development of early psychosis have been little studied in low-income countries. This study examines differences in the prevalence of SLEs in Mexican at clinical high risk (CHR) and those with familial high risk for psychosis who do not meet CHR criteria (non-CHR FHR). We also analyze the association between SLEs and CHR.MethodsParticipants included 43 persons with CHR and 35 with non-CHR FHR. CHR criteria were assessed with the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental State. SLEs were assessed using the Questionnaire of Stressful Life Events.ResultsParticipants with CHR reported more SLEs associated with negative academic experiences than those in the non-CHR FHR group. Bullying (OR = 7.77, 95% CI [1.81, 33.32]) and low educational level (OR = 21.25, 95% CI [5.19, 46.90]) were the strongest predictors of CHR, while starting to live with a partner (OR = 0.26, 95% CI [0.10, 0.84]) was associated with a lower risk of CHR.ConclusionNegative school experiences increase the risk of psychosis, particularly bullying, suggesting that schools may be ideal settings for implementing individual preventive strategies to reduce risk factors and increase protective factors to improve the prognosis of those at risk of developing psychosis. In Latin America, there are multiple barriers to early intervention in psychosis. It is thus crucial to identify risk and protective factors at the onset and in the course of psychosis in order to design effective preventive interventions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1254993/fullstressful life eventsclinical high riskfamilial high riskpsychosisbullyingdeveloping countries
spellingShingle Lourdes Nieto
Tecelli Domínguez-Martínez
Laura Navarrete
Mauricio Rosel-Vales
Ricardo Saracco-Álvarez
César Celada-Borja
Maria Luisa Rascón-Gasca
Luis Gerardo Moncayo Samperio
The effect of stressful life events on the risk for psychosis: differences between Mexican at clinical and familial high risk
Frontiers in Psychiatry
stressful life events
clinical high risk
familial high risk
psychosis
bullying
developing countries
title The effect of stressful life events on the risk for psychosis: differences between Mexican at clinical and familial high risk
title_full The effect of stressful life events on the risk for psychosis: differences between Mexican at clinical and familial high risk
title_fullStr The effect of stressful life events on the risk for psychosis: differences between Mexican at clinical and familial high risk
title_full_unstemmed The effect of stressful life events on the risk for psychosis: differences between Mexican at clinical and familial high risk
title_short The effect of stressful life events on the risk for psychosis: differences between Mexican at clinical and familial high risk
title_sort effect of stressful life events on the risk for psychosis differences between mexican at clinical and familial high risk
topic stressful life events
clinical high risk
familial high risk
psychosis
bullying
developing countries
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1254993/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lourdesnieto theeffectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT tecellidominguezmartinez theeffectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT lauranavarrete theeffectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT mauricioroselvales theeffectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT ricardosaraccoalvarez theeffectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT cesarceladaborja theeffectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT marialuisarascongasca theeffectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT luisgerardomoncayosamperio theeffectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT lourdesnieto effectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT tecellidominguezmartinez effectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT lauranavarrete effectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT mauricioroselvales effectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT ricardosaraccoalvarez effectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT cesarceladaborja effectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT marialuisarascongasca effectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk
AT luisgerardomoncayosamperio effectofstressfullifeeventsontheriskforpsychosisdifferencesbetweenmexicanatclinicalandfamilialhighrisk