Theories and Uses in Common: Responses of Art in the Public Sphere

Different theories on public sphere(s) complete each other or collide in examining the intersubjective relationships involved in organizing and administering the responses of society to the political and economical power repertory. Habermas’s default theory, who invokes the critical participation o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cătălin Gheorghe
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi 2010-12-01
Series:Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology and Practical Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.metajournal.org//articles_pdf/316-327-catalin-gheorghe-meta4-tehno.pdf
_version_ 1818827048821456896
author Cătălin Gheorghe
author_facet Cătălin Gheorghe
author_sort Cătălin Gheorghe
collection DOAJ
description Different theories on public sphere(s) complete each other or collide in examining the intersubjective relationships involved in organizing and administering the responses of society to the political and economical power repertory. Habermas’s default theory, who invokes the critical participation of every citizen in the public communication, is rather extended in the countertheories represented by Fraser’s “subaltern counterpublics”, Mouffe’s “agonistic politics” or Hardt and Negri’s “shared commons”. These observations are undertaken by artists in their public art practices and inform the contemporary art theories on audience participation.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T00:37:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a1cd5d4983254616a64a9af84325d8d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2067-3655
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-19T00:37:22Z
publishDate 2010-12-01
publisher Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi
record_format Article
series Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology and Practical Philosophy
spelling doaj.art-a1cd5d4983254616a64a9af84325d8d02022-12-21T20:44:44ZdeuAlexandru Ioan Cuza University of IasiMeta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology and Practical Philosophy2067-36552010-12-01II2316327Theories and Uses in Common: Responses of Art in the Public SphereCătălin GheorgheDifferent theories on public sphere(s) complete each other or collide in examining the intersubjective relationships involved in organizing and administering the responses of society to the political and economical power repertory. Habermas’s default theory, who invokes the critical participation of every citizen in the public communication, is rather extended in the countertheories represented by Fraser’s “subaltern counterpublics”, Mouffe’s “agonistic politics” or Hardt and Negri’s “shared commons”. These observations are undertaken by artists in their public art practices and inform the contemporary art theories on audience participation.http://www.metajournal.org//articles_pdf/316-327-catalin-gheorghe-meta4-tehno.pdfpubliccounter-publicartcommunicationagonisticcommons
spellingShingle Cătălin Gheorghe
Theories and Uses in Common: Responses of Art in the Public Sphere
Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology and Practical Philosophy
public
counter-public
art
communication
agonistic
commons
title Theories and Uses in Common: Responses of Art in the Public Sphere
title_full Theories and Uses in Common: Responses of Art in the Public Sphere
title_fullStr Theories and Uses in Common: Responses of Art in the Public Sphere
title_full_unstemmed Theories and Uses in Common: Responses of Art in the Public Sphere
title_short Theories and Uses in Common: Responses of Art in the Public Sphere
title_sort theories and uses in common responses of art in the public sphere
topic public
counter-public
art
communication
agonistic
commons
url http://www.metajournal.org//articles_pdf/316-327-catalin-gheorghe-meta4-tehno.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT catalingheorghe theoriesandusesincommonresponsesofartinthepublicsphere