Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?

While not touted as a universal panacea for access problems, contingency fees have received general praise as an important and justice-improving initiative.  By back-loading the payment of legal fees, the assumption is that the interests of clients and litigants will be better served.  I challenge t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Allan C. Hutchinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2020-09-01
Series:The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
Online Access:https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/6419
_version_ 1797709489394155520
author Allan C. Hutchinson
author_facet Allan C. Hutchinson
author_sort Allan C. Hutchinson
collection DOAJ
description While not touted as a universal panacea for access problems, contingency fees have received general praise as an important and justice-improving initiative.  By back-loading the payment of legal fees, the assumption is that the interests of clients and litigants will be better served.  I challenge that received wisdom.  While the rise of contingency fee agreements between lawyers and clients has increased the number of people who can afford lawyers and make successful claims, the more challenging issue is whether that increase is being achieved at too high a price to clients and litigants – while more people are able to bring a case, which they could not otherwise have done, they will be receiving far less than they might actually be entitled to.  In short, do contingency fees work as much or more to the advantage of lawyers than clients?  I suggest not.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T06:38:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a1d15bbed2824998a11d0cb3511a808b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-5017
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T06:38:24Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
spelling doaj.art-a1d15bbed2824998a11d0cb3511a808b2023-09-03T01:12:24ZengUniversity of WindsorThe Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice2561-50172020-09-013610.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6419Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?Allan C. Hutchinson0York UniversityWhile not touted as a universal panacea for access problems, contingency fees have received general praise as an important and justice-improving initiative.  By back-loading the payment of legal fees, the assumption is that the interests of clients and litigants will be better served.  I challenge that received wisdom.  While the rise of contingency fee agreements between lawyers and clients has increased the number of people who can afford lawyers and make successful claims, the more challenging issue is whether that increase is being achieved at too high a price to clients and litigants – while more people are able to bring a case, which they could not otherwise have done, they will be receiving far less than they might actually be entitled to.  In short, do contingency fees work as much or more to the advantage of lawyers than clients?  I suggest not.https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/6419
spellingShingle Allan C. Hutchinson
Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?
The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
title Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?
title_full Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?
title_fullStr Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?
title_full_unstemmed Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?
title_short Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?
title_sort improving access to justice do contingency fees really work
url https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/6419
work_keys_str_mv AT allanchutchinson improvingaccesstojusticedocontingencyfeesreallywork