Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children with Torticollis: Randomized Controlled Trial

We investigated the efficacy of the McGrath videolaryngoscope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope in children with torticollis. Thirty children aged 1–10 years who underwent surgical release of torticollis were randomly assigned into the McGrath and Macintosh groups. Orotracheal intubation was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Hur, Jong Yeop Kim, Sang Kee Min, Kyuheok Lee, Young Ju Won, Ji Eun Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Children
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/8/12/1171
_version_ 1797505841953243136
author Min Hur
Jong Yeop Kim
Sang Kee Min
Kyuheok Lee
Young Ju Won
Ji Eun Kim
author_facet Min Hur
Jong Yeop Kim
Sang Kee Min
Kyuheok Lee
Young Ju Won
Ji Eun Kim
author_sort Min Hur
collection DOAJ
description We investigated the efficacy of the McGrath videolaryngoscope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope in children with torticollis. Thirty children aged 1–10 years who underwent surgical release of torticollis were randomly assigned into the McGrath and Macintosh groups. Orotracheal intubation was performed by a skilled anesthesiologist. The primary outcome was the intubation time. The Cormack–Lehane grade, lifting force, intubation difficulty scale (IDS), difficulty level, and intubation failure rate were also assessed. The intubation time was significantly longer in the McGrath group than in the Macintosh group (31.4 ± 6.7 s vs. 26.1 ± 5.4 s, <i>p</i> = 0.025). Additionally, the Cormack–Lehane grades were comparable between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.101). The lifting force and IDS were significantly lower in the McGrath group than in the Macintosh group (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.022, respectively). No significant differences were observed with respect to endotracheal intubation difficulty and intubation success rate. Intubation-related complications were also not observed. In conclusion, compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, the McGrath videolaryngoscope extended the intubation time and did not improve glottic visualization in children with torticollis, despite having a lesser lifting force, lower intubation difficulty scale, and similar success rate.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T04:24:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a1d4ab83f8db4df49081606a97835694
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T04:24:06Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Children
spelling doaj.art-a1d4ab83f8db4df49081606a978356942023-11-23T07:42:53ZengMDPI AGChildren2227-90672021-12-01812117110.3390/children8121171Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children with Torticollis: Randomized Controlled TrialMin Hur0Jong Yeop Kim1Sang Kee Min2Kyuheok Lee3Young Ju Won4Ji Eun Kim5Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul 08308, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, KoreaWe investigated the efficacy of the McGrath videolaryngoscope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope in children with torticollis. Thirty children aged 1–10 years who underwent surgical release of torticollis were randomly assigned into the McGrath and Macintosh groups. Orotracheal intubation was performed by a skilled anesthesiologist. The primary outcome was the intubation time. The Cormack–Lehane grade, lifting force, intubation difficulty scale (IDS), difficulty level, and intubation failure rate were also assessed. The intubation time was significantly longer in the McGrath group than in the Macintosh group (31.4 ± 6.7 s vs. 26.1 ± 5.4 s, <i>p</i> = 0.025). Additionally, the Cormack–Lehane grades were comparable between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.101). The lifting force and IDS were significantly lower in the McGrath group than in the Macintosh group (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.022, respectively). No significant differences were observed with respect to endotracheal intubation difficulty and intubation success rate. Intubation-related complications were also not observed. In conclusion, compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, the McGrath videolaryngoscope extended the intubation time and did not improve glottic visualization in children with torticollis, despite having a lesser lifting force, lower intubation difficulty scale, and similar success rate.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/8/12/1171anesthesiaairway managementintubationpediatricstorticollis
spellingShingle Min Hur
Jong Yeop Kim
Sang Kee Min
Kyuheok Lee
Young Ju Won
Ji Eun Kim
Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children with Torticollis: Randomized Controlled Trial
Children
anesthesia
airway management
intubation
pediatrics
torticollis
title Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children with Torticollis: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children with Torticollis: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children with Torticollis: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children with Torticollis: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children with Torticollis: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of mcgrath videolaryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope in children with torticollis randomized controlled trial
topic anesthesia
airway management
intubation
pediatrics
torticollis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/8/12/1171
work_keys_str_mv AT minhur comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinchildrenwithtorticollisrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jongyeopkim comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinchildrenwithtorticollisrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sangkeemin comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinchildrenwithtorticollisrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kyuheoklee comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinchildrenwithtorticollisrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT youngjuwon comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinchildrenwithtorticollisrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jieunkim comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinchildrenwithtorticollisrandomizedcontrolledtrial