The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies.
Males pay considerable reproductive costs in acquiring mates (precopulatory sexual selection) and in producing ejaculates that are effective at fertilising eggs in the presence of competing ejaculates (postcopulatory sexual selection). Given these costs, males must balance their reproductive investm...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3976321?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1819042759854522368 |
|---|---|
| author | Luke T Barrett Jonathan P Evans Clelia Gasparini |
| author_facet | Luke T Barrett Jonathan P Evans Clelia Gasparini |
| author_sort | Luke T Barrett |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Males pay considerable reproductive costs in acquiring mates (precopulatory sexual selection) and in producing ejaculates that are effective at fertilising eggs in the presence of competing ejaculates (postcopulatory sexual selection). Given these costs, males must balance their reproductive investment in a given mating to optimise their future reproductive potential. Males are therefore expected to invest in reproduction prudently according to the likelihood of obtaining future matings. In this study we tested this prediction by determining whether male reproductive investment varies with expected future mating opportunities, which were experimentally manipulated by visually exposing male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) to high or low numbers of females in the absence of competing males. Our experiment did not reveal consistent effects of perceived future mating opportunity on either precopulatory (male mate choice and mating behaviour) or postcopulatory (sperm quality and quantity) investment. However, we did find that male size and female availability interacted to influence mating behaviour; large males visually deprived of females during the treatment phase became more choosy and showed greater interest in their preferred female than those given continuous visual access to females. Overall, our results suggest males tailor pre- rather than postcopulatory traits according to local female availability, but critically, these effects depend on male size. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T09:46:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a208b5b4e16041acb290f66abd9fb9b2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T09:46:00Z |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-a208b5b4e16041acb290f66abd9fb9b22022-12-21T19:08:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0194e9378010.1371/journal.pone.0093780The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies.Luke T BarrettJonathan P EvansClelia GaspariniMales pay considerable reproductive costs in acquiring mates (precopulatory sexual selection) and in producing ejaculates that are effective at fertilising eggs in the presence of competing ejaculates (postcopulatory sexual selection). Given these costs, males must balance their reproductive investment in a given mating to optimise their future reproductive potential. Males are therefore expected to invest in reproduction prudently according to the likelihood of obtaining future matings. In this study we tested this prediction by determining whether male reproductive investment varies with expected future mating opportunities, which were experimentally manipulated by visually exposing male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) to high or low numbers of females in the absence of competing males. Our experiment did not reveal consistent effects of perceived future mating opportunity on either precopulatory (male mate choice and mating behaviour) or postcopulatory (sperm quality and quantity) investment. However, we did find that male size and female availability interacted to influence mating behaviour; large males visually deprived of females during the treatment phase became more choosy and showed greater interest in their preferred female than those given continuous visual access to females. Overall, our results suggest males tailor pre- rather than postcopulatory traits according to local female availability, but critically, these effects depend on male size.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3976321?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Luke T Barrett Jonathan P Evans Clelia Gasparini The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies. PLoS ONE |
| title | The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies. |
| title_full | The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies. |
| title_fullStr | The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies. |
| title_short | The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies. |
| title_sort | effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3976321?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT luketbarrett theeffectsofperceivedmatingopportunitiesonpatternsofreproductiveinvestmentbymaleguppies AT jonathanpevans theeffectsofperceivedmatingopportunitiesonpatternsofreproductiveinvestmentbymaleguppies AT cleliagasparini theeffectsofperceivedmatingopportunitiesonpatternsofreproductiveinvestmentbymaleguppies AT luketbarrett effectsofperceivedmatingopportunitiesonpatternsofreproductiveinvestmentbymaleguppies AT jonathanpevans effectsofperceivedmatingopportunitiesonpatternsofreproductiveinvestmentbymaleguppies AT cleliagasparini effectsofperceivedmatingopportunitiesonpatternsofreproductiveinvestmentbymaleguppies |