The Quiet Embryo Hypothesis: 20 years on

This article revisits the hypothesis, proposed in 2002, that the successful development of oocytes and preimplantation mammalian embryos is associated with a metabolism which is “quiet” rather than “active”, within limits which had yet to be defined. A distinction was drawn between Functional Quietn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henry J. Leese, Daniel R. Brison, Roger G. Sturmey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.899485/full
_version_ 1818474949254316032
author Henry J. Leese
Daniel R. Brison
Daniel R. Brison
Roger G. Sturmey
Roger G. Sturmey
author_facet Henry J. Leese
Daniel R. Brison
Daniel R. Brison
Roger G. Sturmey
Roger G. Sturmey
author_sort Henry J. Leese
collection DOAJ
description This article revisits the hypothesis, proposed in 2002, that the successful development of oocytes and preimplantation mammalian embryos is associated with a metabolism which is “quiet” rather than “active”, within limits which had yet to be defined. A distinction was drawn between Functional Quietness, Loss of quietness in response to stress and Inter-individual differences in embryo metabolism and here we document applications of the hypothesis to other areas of reproductive biology. In order to encompass the requirement for “limits” and replace the simple distinction between “quiet” and “active”, evidence is presented which led to a re-working of the hypothesis by proposing the existence of an optimal range of metabolic activity, termed a “Goldilocks zone”, within which oocytes and embryos with maximum developmental potential will be located. General and specific mechanisms which may underlie the Goldilocks phenomenon are proposed and the added value that may be derived by expressing data on individual embryos as distributions rather than mean values is emphasised especially in the context of the response of early embryos to stress and to the concept of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. The article concludes with a cautionary note that being “quietly efficient” may not always ensure optimal embryo survival.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T04:43:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a211ce04bc344a5abf0f091c2657d054
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-042X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T04:43:49Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj.art-a211ce04bc344a5abf0f091c2657d0542022-12-22T02:11:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2022-05-011310.3389/fphys.2022.899485899485The Quiet Embryo Hypothesis: 20 years onHenry J. Leese0Daniel R. Brison1Daniel R. Brison2Roger G. Sturmey3Roger G. Sturmey4Centre for Atherothrombosis and Metabolic Disease, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United KingdomDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Old St. Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United KingdomDivision of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, St Mary’s Hospital, Medicine and Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United KingdomCentre for Atherothrombosis and Metabolic Disease, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United KingdomDivision of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, St Mary’s Hospital, Medicine and Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United KingdomThis article revisits the hypothesis, proposed in 2002, that the successful development of oocytes and preimplantation mammalian embryos is associated with a metabolism which is “quiet” rather than “active”, within limits which had yet to be defined. A distinction was drawn between Functional Quietness, Loss of quietness in response to stress and Inter-individual differences in embryo metabolism and here we document applications of the hypothesis to other areas of reproductive biology. In order to encompass the requirement for “limits” and replace the simple distinction between “quiet” and “active”, evidence is presented which led to a re-working of the hypothesis by proposing the existence of an optimal range of metabolic activity, termed a “Goldilocks zone”, within which oocytes and embryos with maximum developmental potential will be located. General and specific mechanisms which may underlie the Goldilocks phenomenon are proposed and the added value that may be derived by expressing data on individual embryos as distributions rather than mean values is emphasised especially in the context of the response of early embryos to stress and to the concept of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. The article concludes with a cautionary note that being “quietly efficient” may not always ensure optimal embryo survival.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.899485/fullmetabolismembryoblastocystamino acidspyruvate
spellingShingle Henry J. Leese
Daniel R. Brison
Daniel R. Brison
Roger G. Sturmey
Roger G. Sturmey
The Quiet Embryo Hypothesis: 20 years on
Frontiers in Physiology
metabolism
embryo
blastocyst
amino acids
pyruvate
title The Quiet Embryo Hypothesis: 20 years on
title_full The Quiet Embryo Hypothesis: 20 years on
title_fullStr The Quiet Embryo Hypothesis: 20 years on
title_full_unstemmed The Quiet Embryo Hypothesis: 20 years on
title_short The Quiet Embryo Hypothesis: 20 years on
title_sort quiet embryo hypothesis 20 years on
topic metabolism
embryo
blastocyst
amino acids
pyruvate
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.899485/full
work_keys_str_mv AT henryjleese thequietembryohypothesis20yearson
AT danielrbrison thequietembryohypothesis20yearson
AT danielrbrison thequietembryohypothesis20yearson
AT rogergsturmey thequietembryohypothesis20yearson
AT rogergsturmey thequietembryohypothesis20yearson
AT henryjleese quietembryohypothesis20yearson
AT danielrbrison quietembryohypothesis20yearson
AT danielrbrison quietembryohypothesis20yearson
AT rogergsturmey quietembryohypothesis20yearson
AT rogergsturmey quietembryohypothesis20yearson